Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full) 

42 players are at MLB Spring Training 

31 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE at MLB Spring Training, and nine players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors. 
11 players are MLB Spring Training NON-ROSTER INVITEES (NRI) 

Last updated 3-17-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 17
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Jose Cuas
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Caleb Kilian
Mark Leiter Jr
* Luke Little
Julian Merryweather
Hector Neris 
Daniel Palencia
* Drew Smyly
* Justin Steele
Jameson Taillon
Hayden Wesneski 
* Jordan Wicks

NRI PITCHERS: 5 
Colten Brewer 
Carl Edwards Jr 
* Edwin Escobar 
* Richard Lovelady 
* Thomas Pannone 

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

NRI CATCHERS: 2  
Jorge Alfaro 
Joe Hudson 

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
* Miles Mastrobuoni
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

NRI INFIELDERS: 3 
David Bote 
Garrett Cooper
* Dominic Smith

OUTFIELDERS: 5
* Cody Bellinger 
Alexander Canario
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

NRI OUTFIELDERS: 1 
* David Peralta

OPTIONED:
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Ben Brown, RHP 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, RHP 
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Keegan Thompson, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 

 



Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Cubs @ Padres: Arrieta vs Friedrich (Game 125)

A Heyward HR and a Lester pickoff throw. Anything is possible!CHC (79-45): RHP Jake Arrieta (15-5, 2.75) 
SD (53-72): LHP Christian Friedrich (4-9, 4.69)
First pitch: 9:10pmCST

Arrieta has reeled off three straight wins, including an ugly one against the Brewers on Thursday (5.2 IP, 5 ER, 3 K, 7 BB). The Padres are 9-38 (.237) against him. Ramirez is 6-16.

Friedrich, an Evanston native, is coming off of three straight losses and has not won since June 23 in Cincinnati. He pitched well enough to win on Tuesday in Tampa Bay (6.2 IP, 2 ER, 5 K, 1 BB) but was let down by the Padre offense. The Cubs are 4-15 (.267) against him.

The ERA king Hendricks (11-7, 2.16) versus Paul Clemens (2-2 4.82) at 2:40pmCST tomorrow to finish the series.

Go Cubs!

Comments

that pickoff throw to baez last night was badly needed. it's not the ability to pick off someone that's important, it's the threat of the pickoff being in play. that's the difference between a 6-10ft lead and a 10-15+ft lead in lester's case. i doubt it will totally end the leads runners are taking, but runners have been getting a bit too bold recently with some insane leads...and multiple incidences of guys taking 3rd while lester stands on the mound watching...and SB attempts are creeping up (16 in the past 6 games, 16 in the 19 games before that). reigning in the silly large leads and lack of fear of anyone aside from d.ross controlling the running game should impact his game more than becoming some pickoff master...because that isn't gonna happen. earlier in the game before the pickoff he ran a guy back to 2nd from the mound without throwing, something that should have been an out if he would have thrown the ball because he had the runner leading/breaking the wrong way.

"[I]t's not the ability to pick off someone that's important, it's the threat of the pickoff being in play." What is actually important is preventing runs, and Lester does that just fine.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob Richardson

except when the dude recently who stole 2nd then jogged to 3rd while lester held the ball looking at him ended up scoring on a sac fly. ...or KC in the playoffs last year. ...or when guys go 1st to 3rd or 2nd to home on a bloop single even though they're not billy hamilton. it's a thing that's not a positive nor does ignoring it let good or neutral things happen. letting baserunners take 15+ ft leads without checking it doesn't mean he improves in some other area. there is no sacrifice for a gain in some other part of his game...not to mention he absolutely needs a catcher who can make up for his shortcomings with little to no exception.

[ ]

In reply to by Tito

if the cubs didn't score a run, he would have pitched well for a loss. this is something every other pitcher for decades does without issue. if every pitcher out there, even the best, watched multiple guys run from 2nd to 3rd while they stood on the mound there wouldn't be a cry to ignore it or claim that's not something worth paying attention to. you don't get a pass for that. it's bad baseball. beyond that, it's interesting and unique in a variety of ways...it's not even 1 thing he does badly with baserunners, it's a slew of things...and some of those things have ebb/flow of how teams react based on how he very occasionally decides to address the issue.

I think the real point here is that you continuing to bring it up every Lester start will get him to improve.

[ ]

In reply to by Tito

that's not the real point...or i would have spoken up about it 3 SB ago on the last thread, but the first anyone heard from me was about a pickoff. but hey, let's not let that stop you from lecturing me about how i shouldn't pick on lester some more...or that i shouldn't find the clown show of what happens when he's got runners on base interesting even though he's the only guy i've ever seen do what he's doing regularly in my lifetime.

Dear Crunch Reporter: It's a long time ago and I confess to having a dislike of Larry Rothschild, but here's the way I remember Rich Hill's demise with the Cubs. Late in 2007, a year in which he won 11 games, Hill was having trouble holding runners, and Rothschild tried to fix the problem by teaching him to slide-step. Hill at the time had a delivery with a distinctive rock-back and kick that allowed him to conceal the ball until it was tool late for the hitter to pick up the fastball. Tampering with his delivery messed him up, and he started having control issues as well as back problems. He was done as far as the Cubs were concerned, but he seems to have gotten back on track six or eight years later. The point is that it's dangerous to mess with a pitcher's delivery at the major-league level. It is what it is. You should have seen it coming, and dealt with it earlier. Lester is 14-4, he'll be strong in the playoffs, but he won't change or get better.

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

at this point i dont think much will change, especially during the season, but it was nice to see him not let the 3rd guy (4th possible, since 2 were stopped in the SD game) in his few recent games waltz to 3rd while lester stood on the mound looking at the guy. SD tried it twice in the last game. one time lester jogged towards 2nd while the runner returned to 2nd...the other time he actually threw and got an out. while all of this is noteworthy to me, and worth ignoring to others, the ebb/flow of how the running game changes around lester and vise-versa is a thing that's under constant evolution and active practice. it's not something that happens 1 way, every time, for months/years, in 1 instance, and only that way. but yeah, some people would rather nothing be said. i think it's really interesting and rare/unique that other teams are obviously interpreting how to handle in different ways.

Is WISCGRAD still around? Here's a project for him or anyone else who would be interested... Lester's allowed 22 SBs. How many of those have scored and how many games did the Cubs lose due to them? #baseballtalk

[ ]

In reply to by Tito

it's not about SB...it never was. jake arrieta being slow to the plate isn't comparable to jon lester not throwing to any base. how the runners read off arrieta isn't anything similar to what a runner is reading off lester. maybe arrieta could use a personal catcher solely to control his running game...but i doubt it's that important.

[ ]

In reply to by Tito

we already has this asinine discussion. you didn't like the answer. there's already an answer above you can apply about how a guy goes from 1st base to home on a sac fly that included him stealing 3rd while lester watched from the mound. the fact that the cubs bats, 100% independent of that situation, scored some runs invalidates it as an issue to you. i find that stupid. we will not get anywhere with this. you know we will not get anywhere with this...because we already had this asinine discussion. #circularlogic

[ ]

In reply to by Tito

if runner = on base and pitcher = j.lester then lead = large if lead = large then probability of extra base on following hit > average of mean okay, enough of that silliness... ...you can read more on the thread i copy/pasted this from the last time you decided you needed to talk to me about me.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

I'm asking how much it has hurt Lester and the Cubs this year. Do you have that answer? I legitimately don't recall you answering that quesion, apart from the condescending silliness you just posted. So if you did answer specifically about the impact of Lester's issue, I'd like to re-read it. Thanks. #baseballtalk

[ ]

In reply to by Tito

shouting down my points about lester with "well, it didn't hurt" is like saying it doesn't matter if a guy starts out walking 3 guys every inning as long it's followed by a K and a double play. it's like elevating ERA and wins to a high level while ignoring what it took to get there. the individual contribution can still be good, but flawed. lester has an obvious flaw that only he can address, and until it's addressed (if addressed) he's out there doing things with runner that NO OTHER PITCHER IN THE GAME is doing. yes, this is interesting to me as much as it being pointed out is irritating to you. this doesn't happen every season/decade/century as far as i can tell. what he's doing on the mound isn't comparable to greg "i dont check runners" maddux or jake "slow delivery/SB pains" arrieta. it doesn't matter if a single run never scored. check that again. it doesn't matter if a single run never scored. nothing he does with this shortcoming sets up a situation where he takes an advantage because of what the runners are doing on the bases. lester doesn't get a special set of improved odds because he can't control a guy taking 5-10' extra lead off a base, ignores a double play or lead runner to get an underhanded throw out at first, or watches a guy take another base without attempting an out...for a start. he is still putting himself at a disadvantage and also needs a personal catcher to make up for the things he can't/won't do. he is the only guy in the game that needs this. his issue isn't a singular thing and manifests itself in the total running game.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

He is putting himself at a disadvanage. But how much of one relative to the rest of his game? He's not Justin Germano -- he's inarguably one of the best SPs in baseball, issue or not. It would be more of thing to discuss ad nauseum if it constantly caused him to give up runs and lose games. But it doesn't. #baseballtalk

[ ]

In reply to by Tito

he gains nothing, no advantage, no saving of resources, nothing...there is not a cost/benefit tradeoff...him letting the running game go on around him for others to control isn't gaining him an advantage elsewhere. it's putting him at a disadvantage even if it's not cashed in with a run. he puts himself at a statistical disadvantage letting runners take huge leads and he raises his pitch count by leaving outs on the bases because he can only throw to 1st underhanded after a short jog. just because he can do "4-out innings" well doesn't mean he should let them happen because he can pitch his way out of it. besides, this is gambling even if his talent lets him win more than he loses. baseball is a game of statistical margins and capitalization on marginal advantages. long story short, what he's doing has no excuse to me. it's also a weird ass clown show to watch in practice. things happen with him on the mound that no other pitcher in the game allows anyone to see happen.

And out of respect for the rest of TCR, I'm done on this. I'm sure I'm not the only one in the other camp, but time to let it go. (Until the next Lester start. I kid.) #baseballtalk

On another topic....I returned to South Bend last night for the 2nd time this season (still haven't tried either the deep-fried mac & cheese sandwich nor "The Porknado", as the drive home is over an hour and that could get ugly), and was pleasantly surprised to find D. Underwood pitching in a rehab start. He looked good -- although, to be fair, these are low-A hitters -- fastball consistently at 94-95 (if the SB scoreboard is to be believed -- several pitches were clocked in the 30s...) and with good location. 3IP, no hits, one walk, 5Ks -- the highlight was a perfectly located 97mph fastball to punch out Kirk Gibson's son Cam, who swung, feebly, after the ball was in the catcher's mitt. The son looks just like his father, including batting stance. Eloy Jiminez looks ready to move up -- a line-drive single and a rocket that hit about 15 feet up on the extremely high CF wall that is 405 feet from home. I imagine that wall (which has got to be 25 feet high and provides ivy as the hitting background) has cost him a few HRs, and may be one reason he leads the league in doubles instead of HR. Also -- Eddy Martinez looked good (two hits, a line out and a steal of third), much better than when I saw him in June. One caveat -- the West Michigan Whitecaps pitchers were all LH until the 9th, so neither hitter had to deal with any RH breaking stuff. Eloy just looks bigger, better and more athletic than anyone else on the field. If anyone is in the area -- I highly recommend a visit to Four Winds Field in South Bend. A very enjoyable night of baseball.

[ ]

In reply to by billybucks

four winds field is awesome. it's crazy how minor league parks have "grown up" since the 80s/90s and that park was one of the late-80s models that showed a low-capacity ballpark could look like you're at something other than a highschool baseball game.

real shame I missed this week's episode of The Crunch Reporter.

It's highly unusual.

It does matter a little.

It matters much less than you think.

 

 

my gawd...that castillo-to-bryant pickoff was a thing of beauty. the knock on him in the minors being slow out of the crouch is looking less like a thing.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

Yes!!! Thanks crunch!! It's mesmerizing

Dylan Cease throwing gas tonight for the Emeralds. In first three innings, has hit 100 mph six times, averaging 98 mph

Recent comments

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s a fantastic deal for SF

  • crunch (view)

    SF snags b.snell...2/62m

  • Cubster (view)

    AZ Phil: THAT is an awesome report worth multiple thanks. I’m sure it will be worth reposting in an “I told you so” in about 2-3 years.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    The actual deadline to select a post-2023 Article XX-B MLB free agent signed to 2024 minor league contract (Cooper, Edwards, and Peralta) to the MLB 40-man roster is not MLB Opening Day, it is 12 PM (Eastern) this coming Sunday (3/24). 

    However, the Cubs could notify the player prior to the deadline that the player is not going to get added to the 40 on Sunday, which would allow the player to opt out early. Otherwise the player can opt out anytime after the Sunday deadline (if he was not added to the 40 by that time). 

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Today is an off day for both the Cubs MLB players and the Cubs minor league players.  

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    For those of you keeping track, so far nine players have been called up to Mesa from the Cubs Dominican Academy for Minor League Camp and they will be playing in the ACL in 2024: 

    * bats or throws left 

    Angel Cepeda, INF 
    * Miguel Cruz, P
    Yidel Diaz, C 
    * Albert Gutierrez, 1B
    Fraiman Marte, P  
    Francis Reynoso, P (ex-1B) 
    Derniche Valdez, INF 
    Edward Vargas, OF 
    Jeral Vizcaino, P 

    And once again, despite what you might read at Baseball Reference and at milb.com, Albert Gutierrez is absolutely positively a left-handed hitter (only), NOT a right-handed hitter.

    Probably not too surprisingly, D. Valdez was the Cubs #1 prospect in the DSL last season, Cepeda was the DSL Cubs best all-around SS prospect not named Derniche Valdez, Gutierrez was the DSL Cubs top power hitting prospect not named Derniche Valdez, E. Vargas was the DSL Cubs top outfield prospect (and Cepeda and E. Vargas were also the DSL Cubs top two hitting prospects), Y. Diaz was the DSL Cubs top catching prospect, and M. Cruz was the DSL Cubs top pitching prospect. 

    F. Marte (ex-STL) and J. Vizcaino (ex-MIL) are older pitchers (both are 22) who were signed by the Cubs after being released by other organizations and then had really good years working out of the bullpen for the Cubs in the DSL last season. 

    The elephant in the room is 21-year old Francis Reynoso, a big dude (6'5) who was a position player (1B) at the Cardinals Dominican Academy for a couple of years, then was released by STL in 2022, and then signed by the Cubs and converted to a RHP at the Cubs Dominican Academy (and he projects as a high-velo "high-leverage" RP in the states). He had a monster year for the DSL Cubs last season (his first year as a pitcher). 

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    DJL: The only players who definitely have opt outs are Cooper, Edwards, and Peralta (Opening Day, 5/1, and 6/1), and that's because they are post-2023 Article XX-B MLB free agents who signed 2024 minor league contracts and (by rule) they get those opt outs automatically. 

    Otherwise, any player signed to a 2024 minor league contract - MIGHT or - MIGHT NOT - have an opt out in their contract, but it is an individual thing, and if there are contractual opt outs the opt out(s) might not necessarily be Opening Day. It could be 5/1, or 6/1, or 7/1 (TBD).

    Because of their extensive pro experience, the players who most-likely have contractual opt outs are Alfaro, Escobar, and D. Smith, but (again), not necessarily Opening Day. 

    Also, just because a player has the right to opt out doesn't mean he will. 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    I love the idea that Madrigal heads to Iowa in case Morel can’t handle third.

    The one point that intrigues me here is Cooper over Smith. I feel like the Cubs really like Smith and don’t want to lose him. Could be wrong. He def seems like an opt out if he misses the opening day roster

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Childersb3: Both Madrigal and Wisdom can be optioned without any restriction. Their consent is not required. 

    They both can be outrighted without restriction, too (presuming the player is not claimed off waivers), but if outrighted they can choose to elect free agency (immediately, or deferred until after the end of the MLB season).

    If the player is outrighted and elects free-agency immediately he forfeits what remains of his salary.

    If he accepts the assignment and defers free agency until after the conclusion of the season, he continues to get his salary, and he could be added back to the 40 anytime prior to becoming a free-agent (club option). 

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Phil, 
    Madrigal and Wisdom can or cannot refuse being optioned to the Minors?
    If they can refuse it, wouldn't they elect to leave the Cubs org?