Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full) 

28 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, and twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors. 

Last updated 3-26-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 15
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Jose Cuas
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Caleb Kilian
Mark Leiter Jr
* Luke Little
Julian Merryweather
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
* Justin Steele
Jameson Taillon
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
* Miles Mastrobuoni
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
Alexander Canario
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Ben Brown, P 
Alexander Canario, OF 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Keegan Thompson, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

 



 

Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Guess the Pitchers

Time to play a little game of who would you rather have on your team....your three contestants.

  ERA
ERA+
IP
Player A
3.26
137
67.1
Player B
2.68
167
86.1
Player C
3.41 125
68.2

 

Everyone should be pointing to Player B, right? Let's add some columns though...

  ERA
ERA+
IP
K/9 BB/9 HR/9
BABIP
FIP
Player A
3.26
137
67.1
 11.40 2.44
 0.41  .331 2.32
Player B
2.68
167
86.1
11.75
4.23
1.03
.185
3.62
Player C
3.41 125
68.2
 7.60 4.85
 0.39 .261
3.80

 

Just a friendly reminder on BABIP (Batting Average on Balls in Play) and FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching), where BABIP should usually settle in the .290 to .310 range for a pitcher, so if a pitcher is below it, don't be suprised when it goes up along with all his other numbers and if he' s above it, dont' be suprised if it goes down. Knuckleballers and change-up specialists are the exception to that rule. FIP is a similar concept, in it's basically the ERA for a pitcher on what they are ultimately responsible for....walks, strikeouts, hit by pitch and home runs, essentially factoring out defense and lady luck.

Kerry Wood acknowledges the crowd

The additional columns make the argument a lot more interesting and it's pretty clear that Player A was considerably unlucky last season and you can say that for his entire injury-plagued career.

But the Cubs, in their quest to improve on a 2008 ballclub have decided they're gonna run with Players B & C, which is pretty clearly going to be an inferior product.  And if there's anyone still trying to figure it out, your players are Kerry Wood (A), Carlos Marmol (B) and Kevin Gregg (C).

Sure, the Cubs are up against it budget-wise, but there's a lot of creativity that could have gotten them to fit Kerry Wood's salary into their budget. The cost of Kerry Wood and Jose Ceda wouldn't be considerably more than the potential costs of Kevin Gregg (expected to make $4M), Michael Wuertz (around $1M), Chad Gaudin (around $2 M), and Neal Cotts ($1 M). And if you really think any of those last three are essential to the Cubs, which I don't, there's probably a few more ways to hack $5-6M if the Cubs are really that desperate (I'm looking at you Jason Marquis).

Yes, Kerry Wood is an injury-risk, moreso than most pitchers and yes, it's generally unwise to throw 9-10MM at a bullpen arm, but it's also unwise to knowingly go into a season trying to win a World Series with lesser talent, which is exactly what the Cubs are preparing to do. 

Is some of this bias towards one of my favorite Cubs players? Maybe, I mean I don't know how you can completely remove that from your sub-conscious. On the other hand, I don't care either. It's not like Kerry Wood is in the Mark Grace stage of his career, he's still one of the best pitchers around, even in a different role. A helluva a lot better than Kevin Gregg will be next season. The ship has probably sailed on Wood pitching for the Cubs in 2009, but there's still that small sliver of hope that the new ownership group gets named rather quickly and rides in on their white horse with a new contract for Kerry Wood. 

Comments

"The ship has probably sailed on Wood pitching for the Cubs in 2009, but there's still that small sliver of hope that the new ownership group gets named rather quickly and rides in on their white horse with a new contract for Kerry Wood." Here's to wishful thinking.

Final Braves/WSox deal:

Vazquez, Logan for C Tyler Flowers, SS Brent Lillibridge, 3B Jon Gilmore and LHP Santos Rodriguez

A's looking at Randy Johnson...

Khalil Greene for Mark Worrell (is he related to Tim or Todd Worrell) and a PTBNL

the Chad Gaudin non-tender talk from the previous thread....

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

ha...mark "13 days!!! 13 days!!!" worrell. he was destined to be traded. he's been telling anyone with a pen or microphone how he wants out of the STL organization for months. btw, he's not related to the other worrells. -edit- well damn, how's this for timing... http://stlcardinals.scout.com/2/818116.html

I agree with ROB G that the Cubs could have kept Wood just by not acquiring Gregg and by non-tendering Cotts, Gaudin, and Wuertz on 12/12, but I think Hendry is more interested in acquiring Jake Peavy and signing either Milton Bradley, Bobby Abreu, or Raul Ibanez to play RF (Hendry: Damn the defense and the compensatory draft pick), and then he will address the bullpen later, after he moves Jason Marquis (and indeed there should be a market for Matquis and his one year remaining at $9.875M after the top FA pitchers have signed). And I think Hendry will gut the farm system (if necessary) to acquire Peavy, too.

Good summary. I don't know if I'd put Wood in "one of the best pitchers around" category after one above-average year, but I agree that Gregg's definitely a downgrade. Perhaps the Cubs can revisit a one-year option with him after they get their other priorities sorted out. I don't think it's quite fair to say they're going into next season with lesser talent since next season hasn't started yet and they're clearly going to try to use some of the money Wood would have gotten for a bat and/or Peavy.

[ ]

In reply to by Andrew

I don't know if I'd put Wood in "one of the best pitchers around" category after one above-average year FWIW... it wasn't just above average. It was a great year. One of, if not THE, best years a reliever had this past season.

[ ]

In reply to by big_lowitzki

Wood did have a very good year, but I can rattle off the the top of my head 6 relievers that were better (Krod, Soria, Lidge, Papelbon, Mariano, Nathan) and if I looked it up I think we could find a few more. Again not taking anything away from Wood he performed a little better than I thought he would, and had a very good year, but I can't see how he was one of the best relievers last season.

[ ]

In reply to by big_lowitzki

According to the stats... Here are just the closers (not counting set up guys) I think had a better season in 2008 than Wood in no particular order: 1. Francisco Rodriguez: 2-3, 68.1 IP, 2.24 ERA, 62 saves 2. Joakim Soria: 2-3, 67.1 IP, 1.60 ERA, 42 saves 3. Brad Lidge: 2-0, 69.1 IP, 1.95 ERA, 41 saves 4. Jonathan Papelbon: 5-4, 69.1 IP, 2.34 ERA, 41 saves 5. Mariano Rivera: 6-5, 70.2 IP, 1.40 ERA, 39 saves 6. Joe Nathan: 1-2, 67.2 IP, 1.33 ERA, 39 saves Kerry Wood: 5-4, 66.1 IP, 3.26 ERA, 34 saves I also think there could be a couple others (Valverde & Cordero) that I would consider at least on par with Wood. Again, I think Wood had a very good year, but just not top 5 closer or top 10 reliever. Please don't take any of this as bashing Wood, he performed better than I thought and did very well last year.

[ ]

In reply to by mannytrillo

So pretty much you're just not buying into the who BABIP thing. Go to Vegas and make 7 bets. Put down $100 on the over/under for each of those guys 2009 ERA based on their 2008 ERAs. There's one guy who's probably 5 times as likely to come in 'under' as any of the others. I do notice, now that you list these guys that Wood pitched approximately the same innings as all of them, despite missing, what 18 games?, with the blister.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

Yeah, I can care less about BABIP. You very well might be right about 2009, but we were talking about 2008. I don't think Wood would have dropped his ERA 1.50 points in those 18 games. ANd injuries are part of the game.

[ ]

In reply to by mannytrillo

Well you are right, if you judge pitchers solely based on their ERA then Kerry wasn't one of the best last year. The point of the article, is an illustration why it's foolish to do just that. We're all in agreement now that the point eludes you.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

yeah, I noticed that too which is pretty freakin' odd. Were any of those guys hurt during the year?

also, add the 7 saves Marmol took from Kerry while he was out (not sure if all 7 were during that period) and he's right up in the total saves as well.

[ ]

In reply to by Andrew

not many pitchers can strike out guys at the rate Kerry still can = best pitchers around. Run his 2008 season on a simulator 1000 times, and he would have easily been one of the top relief pitchers in baseball.

Lesser talent in the bullpen is what I meant and acquiring Jake Peavy isn't going to do anything to help that. Peavy's no 8-9 workhorse that will make the bullpen suddenly  an afterthought.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Ok, I see. Yeah, the bullpen as of now is definitely more iffy than last year but if the choice is Peavy or Wood, and it sounds like it might be that for Hendry, I'll take Peavy every day. Hopefully some of the young guys come through strong for us, esp. in a LH role. I think Gregg and Marmol can be competent, if not quite as solid as Marmol, Wood last year. No doubt Kerry's stuff is top tier, maybe some of the filthiest in baseball. And his 2008 was great, better than I thought it was after looking at BABIP and FIP. But with his history (and remember, I love the guy), I think it's about as safe a bet that he'll be out for a significant chunk of next season as it is he matches or improves on 2008. That, with his payroll restrictions and other needs, is I think what led Hendry to his decision.

[ ]

In reply to by Andrew

How can a bullpen that has subtracted Bob "Here it is, meat, see how far you can hit it -- wow, that's pretty far" Howry be more iffy that last year? Stats for relievers can be misleading -- Marmol had a relatively brief stretch where he walked everybody, but gave up few runs. I think he was the best pitcher in the Cubs bullpen last year. I think we should view Kerry's 2008 as a nice farewell gift. Love the guy, and wish him well, but I expect to see him on the DL in 2009. I still don't get giving up Ceda for a mediocre closer, though. Yuck.

ANDREW: If Kerry Wood is still out there after Hendry acquires Peavy, signs Bradley, Abreu, or Ibanez, and trades Marquis, I would think he would be more than willing to try and offer some kind of back-loaded deal that would make it possible to bring KW back. But Woody may not still be there when Hendry is ready to address the bullpen.

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

Not offering Arbitration to KW was really a dumb move. There just isn't anyway else to look at it. For KW to get 10 million in Arbitration it would have taken a 350% jump in his salary to get there. I'm fairly certain that would be an unprecedented level of markup for an arbitrator.

At some point Hendry is going to have to get around to "building" a farm system. I know this isn't the year to do so. But at some point it will be a nice option to have.

[ ]

In reply to by Dr. aaron b

such a weird angle and thought process...

Soto, Theriot are starters from our farm system....2/8 of your starting lineup right there

Lee, Ramirez are byproducts of the farm system....that's half now

Fontenot, Cedeno, Pie, Hoffpauir are likely to be on the roster next year....so that's 8/13 of our position players

Z is a farm system product

Harden is a byproduct

Marmol, Wuertz,  Marshall, Samardzija are from the system

byproducts such as Gregg and Gaudin....

16 of 25 guys right there (and I'm sure I'm missing a few) are somehow related to this crap farm system the Cubs have been running for years.

I'm not going to go through every team, and I'm sure there are some low to mid-market teams that have more, but for a high payroll team, I'm guessing that's pretty high. Do we have a lot of blue-chip position players? Maybe not, but is Hendry suppose to sit around and wait for one to develop if it's not there or go and trade or sign for one instead and try to win? I vote option B.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Rob, I'm talking about right now. Every guy you mention above other than Samja was drafted or signed before 2002. At some point we are going to have to get back around to player development. Unless we start spending like the yankees. And obviously all this Non-Tender crap is pointing in the direction of us Not spending like the Yankees. As I said. We don't have to this year. But it will be needed at some point.

[ ]

In reply to by Dr. aaron b

Let's face it, as much as they're now the Evil Empire, the Red Sox are the model. Somehow they keep churning out top-tier talent, position and pitching, and yet still seem to be in on nearly every big name each offseason. And they're the most successful franchise of the new century.

[ ]

In reply to by Dr. aaron b

If the owners keep considerably upping his payroll like they have the past few years he can get away from not having a good farm system. And I think SD might be showing the days of Hendry being able to send off overhyped/not good prospects for good proven players might be over.

BTW, just because Hendry is prepared to non-tender Gaudin, Cotts, and/or Wuertz on 12/12 doesn't mean he can't trade one, two, or all three of them for auto-renewal guys next week at the Winter Meetings, just like he did last year when he traded Will Ohman (who was arbitration-eligible) to ATL for Jose Ascanio (and speaking of Ascanio, he is having a very good season in the VWL so far).

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

If you're keeping score at home, then I believe you have to read Hendry's moves pretty much as AZ Phil is laying them out in these posts. All 'loyalty' and 'fan' feelings aside, Hendry made a necessary business move in NOT bringing Wood back if he indeed does have payroll limitations at this point in the off-season. Offering Wood arbitration would have garnered him well over the $7M he earned in 2008 with his $4M base and over $3M in incentives. I've got 2009 payroll at $130-135M right now assuming only R. Johnson and Gregg get arbitration money and Fontenot, K. Hill, Hoffpauir, Marmol, Marshall, Soto, and Theriot are auto-renewed. Assuming he even gets approval to go to $145-150M for 2009, there's no way he gets Peavy and a LH hitting RF without dumping Wood's salary and non-tendering Cotts, Gaudin, and Wuertz. I'd be amazed if his budget is even that high. Of course Marquis and his salary has to go as well if the RF is Abreu or Ibanez. And I hope to God Dunn is NOT under consideration - watching him in the OF 150 times next season would make me retch on a regular basis even if he hit 50 HR's. As Stone said today on WSCR - "he's a DH in search of an AL team". And I can't say I disagree with this strategy if it nets a rotation of Z, Peavy, Dempster, Lilly, and Harden, and puts Abreu's bat in the 3, 4, or 5 hole. The downside is I see no money to sign Furcal, and Roberts to play 2B only if the O's would take DeRosa, Pie, and/or Marquis in return. Having to rely on DeRosa/Theriot to play 2B/SS next year and Harden in the rotation almost forces Hendry to keep Fontenot and Marshall out of any trades. Good luck with that. But back to the point of Rob G's post, it really isn't about if Marmol and Wood would have been better than Marmol and Gregg. It's about money and a payroll budget.

the little related articles sidebar on the right has been fun to look through the archives. Since you could throw a dart and find an article where I sound like a fool, here's one where I wasn't too far off at least. http://thecubreporter.com/2008/07/01/buy-low-sell-high since it uses pitcher peripheral numbers like this article, I thought it has some relevancy.

Len Kasper re-signed through 2011. No word if he'll still be an unpaid PR man for the Redwalls however.

If I ever testify against the mob on TV, please do not have ROB G do the pixalation of my face.

Gaudin isnt getting non-tendred as I am sure there is a good market for a league average starter who only makes $3 or 4 mil through aribration. My money would be on the scenerio AZ Phil mentioned, with us getting a SP who is a auto-renewal guy with options left who would be a 1 or 2 starter for Iowa and one of our primary spot starters. I think we will keep Cotts, simply because we wont have any loogy candidates left expect for Marshall who we need as a spot starter or trade bait. Wuertz will be gone through, seeing how he is in Lou's doghouse. Though unlike Gaudin I dont see us getting anything of use for him, likely a minor league roster-filler or 2.

Haven't seen this mentioned here yet... according to Baseball America, the Cubs have signed three minor league free agents: RHP Angel Castro -- AA reliever for Detroit last year, 3.30 ERA, 33/19 K/BB in 43.2 IP. LHP Jason Waddell -- AA reliever for San Francisco, 3.38 ERA, 70/36 K/BB in 64 IP. and C Mark L. Johnson returns to the system after spending part of last season catching in St. Louis. Solid replacement for Koyie Hill in Des Moines.

BABIP cracks me up -- "normal is between .290 and .310". None of the 3 pitchers were in that range, not even within 20 points of it, which allows for all sorts of conjecture -- Marmol was lucky, Kerry wasn't, etc. Terrific stat.

i've been wanting to hold off writing on the topic, but well...i'm bored again...wee... marmol/gregg/samninja...cotts/weurtz/asscan/marshall-marquis/etc. personally, i don't think that's a weak pen. then again i don't have issues with cotts/wuertz and i don't mind gregg. none (except maybe marmol) are on kerry wood's level, but none are looking even 1/2 the paycheck wood is. i don't really see an immediate need there.

Recent comments

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    18-year old SS Jefferson Rojas almost made the AA Tennessee Opening Day roster, and he is a legit shortstop, so I would expect him to be an MLB Top 100 prospect by mid-season. 

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Among the relievers in the system, I expect RHRP Hunter Bigge at AAA Iowa and RHRP Ty Johnson at South Bend to have breakout seasons on 2024, and among the starters I see LHP Drew Gray and RHP Will Sanders at South Bend and RHP Naz Mule at ACL Cubs as the guys who will make the biggest splash. Also, Jaxon Wiggins is throwing bullpen sides, so once he is ready for game action he could be making an impact at Myrtle Beach by June.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    I expect OF Christian Franklin to have a breakout season at AA Tennessee in 2024. In another organization that doesn't have PCA, Caissie, K. Alcantara, and Canario in their system, C. Franklin would be a Top 10 prospect. 

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    The Reds trading Joe Boyle for Sam Moll at last year's MLB Trade Deadline was like the Phillies trading Ben Brown to the Cubs for David Robertson at the MLB TD in 2022. 

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Javier Assad started the Lo-A game (Myrtle Beach versus Stockton) on the Cubs backfields on Wednesday as his final Spring Training tune-up. He was supposed to throw five innings / 75 pitches. However, I was at the minor league road games at Fitch so I didn't see Assad pitch. 

  • crunch (view)

    cards put j.young on waivers.

    they really tried to make it happen this spring, but he put up a crazy bad slash of .081/.244/.108 in 45PA.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Seconded!!!

  • crunch (view)

    another awesome spring of pitching reports.  thanks a lot, appreciated.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Here are the Cubs pitchers reports from Tuesday afternoon's Cardinals - Cubs game art Sloan Park in Mesa:

    SHOTA IMANAGA
    FB: 90-92 
    CUT: 87-89 
    SL: 82-83 
    SPLIT: 81-84
    CV: 73-74 
    COMMENT: Worked three innings plus two batters in the fourth... allowed four runs (three earned) on eight hits (six singles and two doubles) walked one, and struck out six (four swinging), with a 1/2 GO/AO... he threw 73 pitches (52 strikes - 10 swing & miss - 19 foul balls)... surrendered one run in the top of the 1st on a one-out double off Cody Bellinger's glove in deep straight-away CF followed one out later by two consecutive two-out bloop singles, allowed two runs (one earned) in the 2nd after retiring the first two hitters (first batter had a nine-pitch AB with four consecutive two-strike foul balls before being retired 3 -U) on a two-out infield single (weak throw on the run by Nico Hoerner), a hard-contact line drive RBI double down the RF line, and an E-1 (missed catch) by Imanaga on what should been an inning-ending 3-1 GO, gave up another run in the 3rd on a two-out walk on a 3-2 pitch and an RBI double to LF, and two consecutive singles leading off the top of the 4th before being relieved (runners were ultimately left stranded)... threw 18 pitches in the 1st inning (14 strikes - two swing & miss, one on FB and the other on a SL - four foul balls), 24 pitches in the 2nd inning (17 strikes - three swing & miss, one on FB, two SPLIT - six foul balls), 19 pitches in the 3rd inning (13 strikes - seven swing & miss, three on SL, two on SPLIT, one on FB - three foul balls), and 12 pitches without retiring a batter in the top of the 4th (8 strikes - no swing & miss - four foul balls)... Imanaga throws a lot of pitches per inning, but it's not because he doesn't throw strikes...  if anything, he throws too many strikes (he threw 70% strikes on Tuesday)... while he gets a ton of swing & miss (and strikeouts), he also induces a lot of foul balls because he doesn't try to make hitters chase his pitches by throwing them out of the strike zone... rather, he uses his very diverse pitch mix to get swing & miss (and lots of foul balls as well)... he also is a fly ball pitcher who will give up more than his share of HR during the course of the season...   
     
    JOE NAHAS
    FB: 90-92 
    SL: 83-85 
    CV: 80-81 
    COMMENT: Was called up from the Hi-A South Bend group at Minor League Camp for the day... relieved Imanaga with runners at first and second and no outs in the top of the 4th, and after an E-2 catcher's interference committed by Miguel Amaya loaded he bases, Nahas struck out the side (one swinging & two looking)... threw 16 pitches (11 strikes - two swinging)...   

    YENCY ALMONTE
    FB: 89-92 
    CH: 86 
    SL: 79 
    COMMENT: Threw an eight-pitch 5th (five strikes - no swing & miss), with a 5-3 GO for the first out and an inning-ending 4-6-3 DP after a one-out single... command was a bit off but he worked through it...   

    FRANKIE SCALZO JR
    FB: 94-95
    CH: 88 
    SL: 83
    COMMENT: Was called up from the AA Tennessee group at Minor League Camp for the day and worked the 6th inning... got the first outs easily (a P-5 and a 4-3 GO) on just three pitches, before allowing three consecutive two-out hard-contact hits (a double and two singles), with the third hit on pitch # 9 resulting in a runner being thrown out at the plate by RF Christian Franklin for the third out of the inning... 

    MICHAEL ARIAS
    FB: 94-96
    CH: 87-89
    SL: 82-83
    COMMENT: Was called up from the AA Tennessee group at Minor League Camp for the day and allowed a hard-contact double on the third pitch of the 7th inning (a 96 MPH FB), and the runner came around to score on a 4-3 GO and a WP... gave up two other loud contact outs (an L-7 and an F-9)... threw 18 pitches (only 10 strikes - only one swing & miss)... stuff is electric but still very raw and he continues to have difficulty commanding it, and while he has the repertoire of a SP, he throws too many pitches-per-inning to be a SP and not enough strikes to be a closer... he is most definitely still a work-in-progress...   

    ZAC LEIGH: 
    FB: 93-94 
    CH: 89 
    SL: 81-83 
    CV: 78
    COMMENT: Was called up from the AA Tennessee group at Minor League Camp for the day and tossed a 1-2-3 8th (4-3 GO, K-swinging on a sweeper, K-looking on another sweeper)... threw 14 pitches (11 strikes - one swing & miss - eight foul balls)... kept pumping pitches into the strike zone but had difficulty putting hitters away (ergo a ton of foul balls)... FB velo is nowhere near the 96-98 MPH it was a couple of years ago when he was a Top 30 prospect, but his secondaries are better...   

    JOSE ROMERO:  
    FB: 93-95
    SL: 82-84
    COMMENT: Was called up from the Hi-A South Bend group at Minor League Camp for the day and worked the 9th (14 pitches - only six strikes- no swing & miss) and allowed a solo HR after two near-HR fly outs to the warning track, before getting a 3-1 GO to end the inning... it was like batting practice when he wasn't throwing pitches out of the strike zone...

  • crunch (view)

    pablo sandoval played 3rd and got a couple ABs (strikeout, single!) in the OAK@SF "exhibition"

    mlb officially authenticated the ball of the single he hit.  nice.

    he's in surprisingly good shape considering his poor body condition in his last playing seasons.  he's not lean, but he looks healthier.  good for him.