Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Rockies @ Cubs: Butler vs. Lester (Game 100 Thread)

COL (43-55): RHP Eddie Butler (3-6, 4.77)

CHC (52-47): LHP Jon Lester (5-8, 3.32)

First pitch: 1:20pmCT

Blackmon* cf

Reyes# ss

Arenado 3b

Gonzalez* rf

Lemahieu 2b

Stubbs lf

Paulson* 1b

Hundley c

Butler p

 

Fowler# cf

Schwarber* lf

Bryant 3b

Rizzo* 1b

Coghlan* rf

Russell ss

Ross c

Lester* p

Herrera# 2b


Lester gave up 2 ER in 7 innings against the Phillies for a no-decision last Friday. He
pitched in Colorado in June 2010, giving up 1 ER and 6 hits and taking the loss in the 2-1 game. The Rockies are 11-59 against him (.186). Morneau is 7-22 (.318) with a HR.

Butler had a no decision (6 IP, 3 ER) against the Reds his last time out. He is 2-3 with a 3.89 ERA on the road and 2-1 with a 2.82 in day games. Only Montero (1-2) has faced him.

Ramirez (left ab soreness) returns to the DL and Beeler is back to AAA. To take their spots, Medina and RHP Ben Rowen are called up. For AA and AAA (BAL and CHC), Rowen was a combined 4-0 with a 1.93 ERA. The bigger news is that Castro and Soler sit and Schwarber gets his first start in LF. (I like it....discuss.)

So back to 5 over .500 we go, which means the Cubs have been playing .500 ball since April 28, when they went 12-7 after beating the Pirates.

For the series with the Brewers, we’ll see Nelson vs. Arrieta, Jungmann vs. Hammel, Garza (and his mouth) vs. Hendricks, and Lohse vs. Someone Who is not Named Beeler.

Go Cubs!

 

Comments

It will be interesting to see what Rowen can do. I am not sure why Medina is back up, though he did do a noble job of eating innings on Sunday with 70 pitches.

I still hope Castro is getting traded. I know it's wishful thinking. It's a day game after a night game and he has been struggling. But two nights ago he had a good game ... so it's not out of the realm of possibility they are dealing him. And yes his value is low but he's gotta go. It's Russell time at SS. I think Soler resting is because of health precautions and pacing. Schwarber in LF is awesome - today it's because of Lester/Ross but this team will be much better with Montero and Schwarber in lineup if Montero regains full strength or anything close to it!

[ ]

In reply to by Carlito

Yeah, no matter what happens the final two months, it has been great finally seeing some of this long term planning come to fruition. Fun to think that for five years or so we could have Schwarber, Rizzo, Baez (?), Russell, Bryant, and Soler. When you have 6-7 positions with young, club controlled guys entering their primes, good things will come. And Castro just seems like the odd man out at this point. They want paitent hitters who play good defense, etc. and Castro just doesn't fit the mold.

Sammy who? Rameriez ab strain due to sneeze.

everyone's running today. as of the 6th... cubs 0-2 rockies 3-1 lester would be pitching a gem of a scoreless game if he could actually hold a runner.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

COL's 4th sb in the 8th gives lester 30sb given up in 21 games. he passed his career high many games ago. the sb's are cruddy, but the leads the runners are taking that never make it to the stat sheet probably hurt more. this is a guy who throws cy young ball who takes on extra ERA baggage because of his issue with controlling the base running game. man...

[ ]

In reply to by WISCGRAD

in a world where we debate the pros/cons of having a "pitch framing catcher" getting an extra strike or 2 a game no one should care about the combo of lester giving up huge leads and being on a pace for 45+ steals given up a year? ...not to mention what happens when he loses a couple mph off his fastball or age takes away a few ticks of time from his speedy delivery. this isn't something huge like, "he needs to learn another pitch" or "he needs to change his arm slot or he's gonna get injured." he should have only given up 1er today.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

While it's a glaring issue that really needs to be addressed I've been going under the assumption they'll probably do so in the offseason. Seems like most of these kinds of things aren't really dealt with during the season, especially as it seems Lester has also has maybe had a few more control issues than normal and is on a team. I think everyone at this point knows it's an issue but I'm not really seeig It being worked on right now. Lot of things I think this off season that will hopefully get worked on to make this a better team, like Soler with breaking balls. Have him hit breaking all after breaking ball in the cage till he can see the spin in his sleep.

[ ]

In reply to by johann

i hope to see him do something different with the running game later this season or next season. he doesn't even have to become some ace pickoff artist. the mere threat of him being able to pick off someone knocks the breath out of a lot of baserunning issues...not just the SB threat or the huge-lead threat.

[ ]

In reply to by Tito

the SBs seem to be minor compared to the crazy leads...the blown double play opportunities, guys going 1st/3rd or 2nd/home on what should be a station-to-station hit, etc. there's too many advantages lost solely because there is no threat to the runner unless it's coming from the catcher. obviously, the SBs have caused runs, but the leads have cost outs and caused runs.

lester with 3 sac bunts today...8th of his career. it took until mid-june for the team's 1st pitcher sac bunt.

cubs win! rondon with a painless save.

OK boys -- how about a few easy wins?? Can't remember the last one of those. Bryant's day/night splits are more brutal than Soler -- KB is now under .200 during day games. Get to bed early boys -- you can party all winter. Scharber with another good day - love young guys who can take a walk.

Off topic -- I'm sitting here in my office at Olivet Nazarene and there's a bunch of football journalists in the next room frantically typing up their Bears' Camp stories on their tablets and laptops. It's in a room called the "Fishbowl" -- the interior walls are all glass. Most are sitting at separate tables -- maybe so nobody can look over their shoulder and see what they are writing?

I wonder if this takes them out of future competitive balance draft lotteries? Bob Nightengale ‏@BNightengale The #STLCards will now even be more dangerous with new 15 year TV extension worth in excess of $1.5 billion and potentially worth much more

Recent comments

  • crunch (view)

    happ, right hamstring tightness, day-to-day (hopefully 0 days).

    he will be reevaluated tomorrow.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    I guess I'm not looking for that type of AB 

    Just a difference of opinion

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I don’t see Tauchman as a weak link in any position. He simply adds his value in a different way.

    I don’t know that we gain much by putting him in the outfield - Happ, Bellinger and Suzuki and Tauchman all field their positions well. If you’re looking for Taucnman’s kind of AB in a particular game I don’t see why it can’t come from DH.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Tauchman gets a pinch hit RBI single with a liner to RF. This is his spot. He's a solid 4th OF. But he isn't a DH. 

    He takes pitches. Useful. I still believe in having good hitters.

    You don't want your DH to be your weak link (other than your C maybe)

  • crunch (view)

    bit of a hot take here, but i'm gonna say it.

    the 2024 marlins don't seem to be good at doing baseballs.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Phil, will the call up for a double header restart that 15 days on assignment for a pitcher? Like will wesneski’s 15 days start yesterday, or if he’s the 27th man, will that mean 15 days from tomorrow?

    I hope that makes sense. It sounds clearer in my head.

  • Charlie (view)

    Tauchman obviously brings value to the roster as a 4th outfielder who can and should play frequently. Him appearing frequently at DH indicated that the team lacks a valuable DH. 

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.