Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Brew Crew Catcher a Pain in the Kottaras

George Kotarras drove-in five runs with bases-loaded doubles in consecutive innings, as the Milwaukee Brewers hammered the Cubs 10-2 in Cactus League action at Dwight Patterson Field at HoHoKam Park in warm & sunny Mesa, AZ, this afternoon.

Battling for a spot in the Cubs starting rotation, RHP Randy Wells got the start and threw three shutout innings (38 pitches – 26 strikes, 7/2 GO/FO), allowing just two hits. He had no walks or strikeouts.

LHP Travis Wood (also battling for a spot in the starting rotation) piggy-backed with Wells, entering the game in the 4th probably with an opportunity to throw multiple innings and (hopefully) make a good impression. But T. Wood did not even retire the side in his first inning of work before getting yanked out of the game, allowing six runs (five earned) on three hits (two doubles and a single), two walks and an HBP. Wood could not throw strikes (31 pitches – only 15 strikes), and when he did throw strikes, the Brewers hit ropes. The Brewers were also aided in the inning by a Reed Johnson error on a laser line-drive to LF (ball just plain tipped off the top of Johnson’s glove, or it might have gone through his glove, it was hit so hard).

RHP Casey Coleman pitched the 5th & 6th, and had a poor outing, throwing what could best be described as batting practice to the Brew Crew. Milwaukee nailed Coleman for four runs on five hits (including three doubles) and two walks, and even the outs were loud. (Coleman had no strikeouts). There has been talk about Coleman maybe having a chance to win a bullpen job in Chicago coming out of Spring Training, but today’s outing could make Coleman Des Moines-bound sooner rather than later.

The Cubs only runs of the day scored in the 4th, in Milwaukee SP Randy Wolf’s fourth inning of work. Starlin Castro smoked a lead-of double into the right-centerfield alley, and scored when Ian Stewart followed with an opposite-field double off the LF fence. (If Stewart is to get back to where he was a couple of years ago, he will need to use the whole field as he did in that AB). Jeff Baker then laced an RBI single, driving-in Stewart from 2nd.

Otherwise, no Cub hitter had more than one hit, and the offense just generally looked pitiful today.

Rule 5 RHP Lendy Castillo worked two hitless & scoreless innings, although he did struggle with his control, walking two batters in the 9th. The Cubs need to decide by MLB Opening Day (April 4th) whether L. Castillo—a converted shortstop who has only been pitching for two years--can pitch in the big leagues after having never pitched above Full-Season “A” (equivalent to Peoria). So expect to see Castillo get a lot of work in the next couple of weeks as the Cubs decide his immediate future.

If it turns out the Cubs choose not to keep L. Castillo on their 25-man roster because they feel he is just not ready to pitch in the big leagues, he would have to first be placed on Outright Waivers, where any of the other MLB clubs could claim him for $25,000 and assume the Rule 5 obligations, and if he is not claimed, he would next have to be offered back to his former organization (the Philadelphia Phillies), who could re-claim Castillo for half the Rule 5 Draft price ($25,000).

It is at this last point where clubs will sometimes work out a trade, allowing the drafting club to keep the player, with the drafting club sending a different player and/or cash to the player’s former club as compensation. If that were to happen with Lendy Castillo, the Cubs could retain the young right-hander, and send him to the minors (probably Daytona) for further seasoning without any restrictions.

The Cubs have their first “split squad” day tomorrow, with about half of the team remaining in Mesa to play the Arizona Diamondbacks, while the rest of the team travels up the Loop 101 Freeway to Salt River Fields at Talking Stick (on the Salt River Pima Indian Reservation east of Scottsdale) to take-on the Colorado Rockies.

Split squad days provide clubs a good opportunity to get pitchers who need work some game action, and it also gives some of the kids from Minor League Camp a chance to show what they can do in an MLB Cactus League game.

Also, tomorrow is the first day Draft-Excluded Players can be sent to the minors, so expect to see young players like Josh Vitters, Junior Lake, and Matt Szczur to be optioned to the minors tomorrow morning (although they can still play in MLB Cactus League games). Several other players (including some on the 40-man roster, as well as some of the non-roster players who are in camp by invitation) will probably get sent to Minor League Camp at the same time, in prepartion for the start of minor league Spring Training games on Friday.

Comments

[ ]

In reply to by jacos

Wed, 03/14/2012 - 7:53pm — jacos Phil who will be up first- BJax or Rizzo? ============================== JACOS: That is such a good question. I love both of them. I hope it isn't just about service time. because I wouldn't want to see either of them kept at Iowa any longer than is necessary. I guess a lot depends on how Bryan LaHair is doing at 1B and when and if the Cubs trade Marlon Byrd. Fact is, Rizzo has clearly outplayed LaHair in all facets of the game so far this spring, and Brett Jackson would provide much of what the Cubs lack (HR power, speed on the bases, and Gold Glove defense in CF). I had some doubts about just how good a prospect Rizzo was when the Cubs made the trade, and I sure did not want to see the Cubs trade Andrew Cashner, but Rizzo is something special.

[ ]

In reply to by George Altman

meh, 1-2 months w/o 23 year old Jackson this year to insure you have 29-year old Jackson and at a more reasonable cost. There's a reason people are impressed by the Rays management, because they understand this simple math equation. Obviously if there's was a gaping hole or the the Cubs weren't going to lose 90 games this year, you might take the chance. But no reason on this team to do that. Rizzo's slightly different only because he already had a call-up and he'd have to stay in the minors longer. Really just depends how LaHair does the first 2 months (I'd at least give him 150 PA's at this point to sink or swim).

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

it's just math, don't get angry about if he blows out his knee or never develops then being called up now or in 1-2 months won't matter either. Smart, non-emotional decisions should always be the ultimate goal. People need to be realistic about the Cubs chances this year and realistic about Brett Jackson's ungodly K rate he needs to still work on. And that players 26-30 are almost always better than the 22-24 versions of themselves. And if they're not, then they weren't going to be that good in the first place. Won't this be a happy problem is we have to worry about his age 29 season? sure, problem is that to enjoy his age 29 season and he is a free agnet and he's as great as we all want, you need to sign him up for his age 33 season and very likely age 34 and age 35 seasons. Or delay his free agency a bit and seriously consider how much you want to invest in the 30 year old version of him. That he's been good for 6 seasons? Who's the last Cub prospect that they've had to be concerned about signing 6 seasons later? Grace? the sins of the past should not be a burden of the future. Grace and past Cubs history has no bearing on Brett Jackson and the current regime.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

True Rob, the sins of the past...etc...good point. I guess I'm just ready to see the Cubs prospects up here...not sitting at Iowa while the Cubs languish in mediocrity. Hopefully when he's ready, he'll get a real shot at CF..a season or two, not just 100 at bats here..50 at bats there...riding the Des Moines/Chicago shuttle. Patience is a virtue...I suppose I just don't have much.

[ ]

In reply to by Childersb3

Wed, 03/14/2012 - 10:40pm — Childersb3 New Phil, I've been reading your stuff know for longer than I can remember. Your comments above about Rizzo are, by far, the most positive and upbeat you have ever written about a Cubs prospect (or player for that matter). Good to hear!! ================================= CHILDERS: Not only that, but the Cubs Extended Spring Training team that will be playing at Fitch Park April-May will feature the likes of Javier Baez, Dan Vogelbach, Jeimer Candelario, Shawon Dunston, Jr, Tayler Scott, Rock Shoulders, Trey Martin, and Jose Arias, and probably Dillon Maples, Yasiel Balaguert, and Neftali Rosario (and maybe Jorge Soler?), too. I can't remember a more talented group of Cubs prospects at EXST.

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

Yeah, somebody, maybe Rob, quoted some guy yesterday in a rundown of non contending clubs that the EXST Cubs will be a lot of fun to watch. It's especially encouraging to hear you talk this way about Rizzo. I, too, haven't seen you this stoked over a prospect. That's probably the best thing I've heard all spring, even more exciting than the Bears getting RapSheet Marshall. EDIT: Hey, Phil -- also, what is it you find so special about Rizzo? I've never seen him. I'm hoping I can catch him when Iowa plays Round Rock down this way.

[ ]

In reply to by Old and Blue

Thu, 03/15/2012 - 7:19am — Old and Blue Yeah, somebody, maybe Rob, quoted some guy yesterday in a rundown of non contending clubs that the EXST Cubs will be a lot of fun to watch. It's especially encouraging to hear you talk this way about Rizzo. I, too, haven't seen you this stoked over a prospect. That's probably the best thing I've heard all spring, even more exciting than the Bears getting RapSheet Marshall. EDIT: Hey, Phil -- also, what is it you find so special about Rizzo? I've never seen him. I'm hoping I can catch him when Iowa plays Round Rock down this way. ================================ O&B: Combination of bat speed and raw HR power, he runs well for a big guy, he's a hard worker, and he handles himself very well around 1st base (although he still needs to smooth-out the rough edges a bit). The one negative is that he will probably be a high-K guy.

BP has a fun article called: "12 Great Seasons by Mediocre Players" #6) CPat (2006, Orioles)
Once one of the brightest prospects in the game, Corey Patterson has been teasing clubs with his raw tools for more than a decade. He's never developed a reasonable approach at the plate, so Patterson has largely disappointed in nearly 4,500 major-league plate appearances, over which he's been worth exactly one win above replacement. The Orioles acquired Patterson from the Cubs prior to the 2006 season, and he rewarded them with his finest big-league season, a 2.4 WARP campaign that brought his career value back into the black for the first time in three years. Unfortunately, the next three years were all below replacement level. Patterson currently qualifies as one of only three players since 1950 (minimum 4000 PA) to have a single season worth more than 200 percent of his career WARP, joining Gary DiSarcina (2.4 WARP in 1995, 0.5 for his career) and Bob Aspromonte, who did it twice (1.9 WARP in 1967, 2.4 WARP in 1962, 0.8 career WARP). —Bradley Ankrom
'' #5) Rick Wilkens, 1993 excerpted...
Wilkins had never shown much power but had been moderately productive the previous season in a job-share with Joe Girardi, and when the Rockies stole Peoria Joe in the expansion draft, the 25-year-old Wilkins was handed the job and ran with it as few have ever done. Typically for the Cubs, their cornerstone catcher slumped badly the next year and face-planted in 1995, posting a career .220/.319/.364 after his breakout season and haunting seven more organizations before hanging ‘em up in 2002. He was an unlikely hero, but for one magical summer when he never missed his pitch, Rick Wilkins was the best catcher Chicago had seen in a generation. —Ken Funck
#8 was Bill Mueller, 2003. Red Sox http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=16188

AZ PHIL: Have you seen much of Rebel Ridling? From what I have read in Cubs propaganda, he has some power chops, but projects as a 1B only. The team sure is stockpiling those 1B prospects. From what you've seen, does Ridling have an MLB shot?

[ ]

In reply to by The E-Man

Thu, 03/15/2012 - 8:13am — The E-Man AZ PHIL: Have you seen much of Rebel Ridling? From what I have read in Cubs propaganda, he has some power chops, but projects as a 1B only. The team sure is stockpiling those 1B prospects. From what you've seen, does Ridling have an MLB shot? ============================== E-MAN: I would compare Rebel Ridling to Russ Canzler, who has made it to MLB as a RH 1B-3B-LF-RF bench guy. The main difference between them is that Canzler has the arm to play 3B and RF in addition to 1B & LF, while Ridling will probably be limited to 1B & LF. But Ridling is an above-average defensive 1B. So I think Ridling has as decent chance to play in the big leagues, just not as an everyday player. Ridling has been working out exclusively at 1B so far at Minor League Camp, but I expect him to get a lot of PT in LF once Anthony Rizzo is optioned to Iowa.

Phil, I believe there won't be any trouble optioning Travis to Iowa since he has options remaining, but does he qualify for some clause making him go through waivers before optioning? I didn't think, so.

[ ]

In reply to by Childersb3

Thu, 03/15/2012 - 8:22am — Childersb3 Phil, I believe there won't be any trouble optioning Travis to Iowa since he has options remaining, but does he qualify for some clause making him go through waivers before optioning? I didn't think, so. =============================== CHILDERS: If you are referring to Travis Wood, the answer would be no. Travis Wood can be optioned to the minors in 2012 with no restrictions. Optional Assignment Waivers for him won't be a factor until July 2013.

#Cubs option Beliveau, Cabrera, Gaub and Vitters to Triple-A Iowa

Dempster started vs. Arizona 3.2 IP, 8 H, 3 ER, 1 BB, 1 HR, 3 K Cubs down 3-0 in 4th, Russell pitching now R. Lopez vs. Rockies 3 IP, 6 H, 2 ER, 0 BB, 2 K, 1 HR Cubs down 2-0 in 4th

1 IP, 1 BB, 1 H, 1 K, 0 ER vs. Arizona ERA down to 17.18

celebrates his demotion with a 3-run HR to tie the game versus Colorado, off some dude named Friedrich. Pacheco hits a 2-run HR though off A. Cabrera (also cut today) to make it 6-4 in the 6th. K. Wood gave up 3 ER in .1 IP vs. Arizona (0 BB, 4 H, 1 K), 7-0 DBacks in the 7th.

Recent comments

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.