Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

The Yoenis Cespedas video. What an athlete!

You guys heard about this superstar Cuban outfielder guy, right? Yoenis Cespedas? And I'm sure you read that the Cubs are Yoenis Cespedas' leading suitor. Anyway, the other day I was driving around listening to The Score, and heard about this legendary Cespedas video. Dan Bernstein was saying that it apparently showed what an amazing, freak athlete this Cespedas guy is - that he reminded people of Bo Jackson. But also that mysteriously, You Tube had taken it down. Well, I went to You Tube and...they musta decided to put it back up because you can find it there! Only, it's over 20 minutes long so I thought I'd give you just the highlights in the above shortened version. On another note, there's a storm bigger than Iowa about to hit Chicago. If I didn't have to be at work, I wouldn't even be down here.

Comments

How disappointing. I wanted to see the oatmeal video of Cespedes on a jet ski with Oprah and Jesus in Outer Space ...or at least the Koala and Goat making whoopee just before Cespedes barbecues them

Prince Fielder Yoenis Cespedes Roy Oswalt Edwin Jackson Francisco Cordero Casey Kotchman Wilson Betemit Johny Damon Jeff Francis Rich Harden Brad Lidge Cody Ross Vlad Hideki Matsui Carlos Guillen Derrek Lee Raul Ibanez Magglio Ordonez Manny Ramirez wouldn't mind a run at Oswalt still, especially if they deal Garza for future prospects.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

I doubt Cubs can afford Oswalt*, but if they can somehow snag him on a 1-year, then hopefully he stays healthy and they flip him at the deadline. But I would imagine Oswalt has enough interest from other teams to sign with someone planning to compete who will keep him around all year(s). *Assuming $35.2M balloon payment due to Alfonso Soriano on 10/4/12.

[ ]

In reply to by John Beasley

Cubs can afford anyone out there right now, just a matter of if they want to. You hate to say they have enough pitching but right now you've got Garza, Dempster, Volstad, Maholm, Wells, Wood, Sonnastine, Samardzija, Coleman, Lopez, Jay Jackson, Nick Struck, Rusin, McNutt and you'd have to promise Oswalt a spot obviously. Now most likely he'd prefer a contender, so chances are slim of course. But if they move Garza for long term prospects and sign Oswalt on a 1-year deal for $8-$10M, I don't think there's a big drop off in performance and you've set yourself up better for the future. why the balloon payment?

it doesn't look like anyone is biting on Edwin Jackson for a multiyear deal...another one that Boras may have overplayed his hand based on what Cincy, Yankees did to find younger and a less expensive (albeit high end prospects) cost It will be interesting to see where he winds up and for how much.

Bruce Levine: "If the Cubs began play today, they would have $109 million committed to the 25-man roster and $3 million to the 15 other players on the 40-man roster. Major league teams also add another $2 million in medical replacement pay for recalls when players go on the DL. The total would be $114 million with the only arbitration case rounded off to $10 million for Matt Garza. Let's assume the team will still add a couple of back-up infielders that might bring the 2012 payroll up to $120 million, which would be a savings of $11 million from 2011." Wait, I thought it was at $70 million?

Reducing the daily meal allowance is the first thing the new regime did that is absolutely idiotic. This is not the way to revamp your scoutng department. It is a way to piss of your scouts and discourage hiring other scouts. What is the point of this nickle and diming?

Woo! Cubs have #1 and #10 ranked prospect first basemen from mlb's Jonathan Mayo... http://t.co/X9rTBiBa Rizzo went up to the top from #7 in 2011. The video includes a Rizzo HR and a defensive gem robbing Fontenot of a hit. and this little tidbit on VogelBOMB...
Non-athletic would be a kind way to describe Vogelbach's body type in high school, but he's already trimmed down as he prepares for his first season of pro ball.

Yes Virginia, there is a a real Fausto Carmona. ...and the real Fausto's mom rats the Indian's pitcher out. per rotoworld:
During an appearance on ESPN's "Outside the Lines" on Friday, Pedro Gomez reported that Fausto Carmona was outed several weeks ago on a popular radio show in Santo Domingo by the mother of the real Fausto Carmona. According to the report, Carmona (aka Roberto Hernandez Heredia) had been paying the family of the real Carmona for the use of his identification and refused to increase payments after the Indians picked up his $7 million club option. The U.S. government subsequently began an investigation following the interview and arrested Heredia when he went to apply for his work visa earlier this week.
video link... http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=7484728

[ ]

In reply to by navigator

You seriously think the Cubs goal/plan is to be the worst team in baseball the next three years? They don't want Pena because they need to get TheHair and eventually Rizzo playing time which, I'm sure, is basically your point. Who should we have hired? And what should his/her plan have been? Keep restocking the rotting major league carcas with overpaid free agents? The pessimism and snarkiness is getting old. They have to start somewhere, no? Also I think they'll avoid being among the worst 4-5 teams in baseball even this year, and it'll be fun to watch compared to the double-off-the-wall-watching, cushy-assed, no-defense, first-pitch-waving lazy-assed teams of the last few years.

According to Nick Cafardo of the Boston Globe:
"Prince Fielder, 1B, free agent - The fact that one of the best hitters in the game is unsigned as we head into late January is the story of the winter. Who will give Fielder seven years? One AL East GM thinks it comes down to the Rangers and Nationals, with the Brewers and Cubs taking a shot if he settles for a one-year deal and elects to become a free agent again."
Why would the Cubs be interested in signing Fielder for just one year? By all accounts, 2012 is going to be a wasted year for the Cubs. Why would they want to pay someone $25 million to be part of a mediocre (or worse) team? It seems much more likely that the Cubs only have interest in Fielder if they can get him on a 5-7 year contract. That's they only way he's going to be part of the team in a year or three when the Cubs are supposed to be good. http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/articles/2012/01/22/2012_r…

[ ]

In reply to by Sweet Lou

With Rizzo waiting in the wings, it wouldn't be the worst move. You'd have some slugging in Wrigley, which the casual fan loves, and you'd have the option of signing him longer term if he loves it here, and Rizzo doesn't pan out. If Rizzo smokes up AAA, and Fielder still likes it here and you want to resign him for more, you have a nice trade chip in Rizzo. Besides, if you bring in Fielder, you have a shot in a pretty mediocre division. Normally, I'd think the Reds aren't mediocre, but with Dusty at the helm...

Everyone says that 2012 will be a wasted year, but their criteria is that the Cubs are not likely to win their division. But winning it all isn't the only thing, especially if you have interest payments on the debt to make. The only pertinent question to Epstein and Ricketts, in deciding whether to sign Fielder to a one year contract is whether he will bring in more income than they have to pay in salary. Most of us on this board are rabid fans who want only to win. But a great many fans go to Wrigley strictly for entertainment and excitement. And home runs are both entertaining and exciting. The park was filled when Sammy Sosa was hitting home runs for a mediocre team. It will probably be filled if Fielder is hitting home runs for a mediocre team. With income coming in from ticket sales, beer and food sales, rooftop sales, jersey sales, as well as general good will generated by a home run star, I have no idea what Fielder is worth in a one year deal. But I bet that Epstein and Ricketts know.

Well, I wonder what the general TCR consensus is: you have $50-80MM you can ammoratize, and you have enough ammo for either Cespedes, or Fielder knowing all there is to know,on face value. What will you do? "You make the call." Keep in mind Cespedes' real name may be Javier Blanco, and he may be 31.

[ ]

In reply to by navigator

C'mon navigator. You of all people know those are not Chicago Cubs prospects, but rather HS kids from Idaho. For all I know the Cubs let them use the name because of the affiliation with the Boise Hawks. Maybe for a fee, maybe just to spread some local goodwill. But to the original articles from Big League Stew and the CBS Sports blog and my original point, those are not Cubs prospects as they wrote. They've both since corrected their articles.

[ ]

In reply to by navigator

it's a cubs sponsored prospect camp, that's all. it's a good semi-private showcase for scouts and instruction from coaches for kids looking to get something beyond their highschool or college coaches. it attracts kids from all over the northwest. it's practically a private scouting session while dangling instruction at a cheap price from pros as a carrot. it's not attracting the cream of the crop as much as it a place where diamonds in the rough are polished a bit and get a good look from scouts for that thing or 2 (or more) that might up their game.

fwiw... "According to FOX Sports' Ken Rosenthal, the Tigers, Marlins and Cubs have been "most active" on Yoenis Cespedes." also, i don't have a link, but i read something last night about MIL being out of the P.Fielder sweepstakes, even for a 1 year deal, because they're going to be over-budget as it is once they pay their arb kids. after the rizzo trade i doubt the cubs are in on fielder, though.

2/$40.5M for Lincecum 2 year deal with 3rd year option for Betemit from O's Nats seem like the last team standing for Fielder.

[ ]

In reply to by big_lowitzki

"The league average XBH% while Rose played was 6.3%. In contrast, Pierre's 4.5% XBH% compares to a league average of 7.9%." Not sure what your point is here. Are you saying that Rose would hit more doubles today? Alternatively, you could be saying that Rose would still be a singles hitter but would be appreciated less today. In either case, here are a couple of other names off the top of my head, Aparicio and Ozzie Smith. Aparicio's XBH% was 5.1, Smith's 4.6. Their gloves and the position they played had a lot to do with their reputations today, but no one is saying that Pierre is a hall of famer, just that he has some skill as a hitter.

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

**Not sure what your point is here. Are you saying that Rose would hit more doubles today** I'm saying that you have to understand players within the era that they played in. Saying that Rose and Pierre are remotely similar due to their XBH% is silly. **Their gloves and the position they played had a lot to do with their reputations today** Ya' think? Again, not even remotely similar. If Juan Pierre could play defense like Ozzie Smith, at any position, he would be a MUCH better baseball player. And I don't think anyone ever considered Ozzie Smith a good hitter. And I have no idea what people thought about Aparicio when he played, but he surely wasn't a good, or even decent, hitter either. He was actually pretty awful. So I'm pretty sure that you don't really want to compare Pierre to Aparicio.

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

can't say I watched Fox play, but his defensive numbers look pretty good on Baseball Reference and he won 3 GG's. Not that I would put a ton of stock into it. Fox also walked a bit more with a bit more slugging than Pierre and more importantly was better at hitting singles (which is really just better at making contact). Every player that is good enough to make a major league roster is gonna be good enough to hit singles. It's a matter if they can make consistent enough contact and their other skills that will define how good they are. and also, the era you play in obviously defines the quality of player you are. Nature evolves, so does baseball.

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

You know, it should also be noted that Moneyball wasn't really about things like OBP, but instead about how the A's (and others) determined what was undervalued (OBP) at the time. It is undeniable that OBP has a very high correlation to runs scored. But that really isn't the point. Successful teams, especially small-market ones, need to find ways to get more value than they are paying for. It is VERY possible that speed or defense may be undervalued. But it isn't very possible that OBP will magically no longer have a high correlation to runs scored. In other words, the actual value of a player isn't cyclical. But the way that teams perceive that value may be cyclical, which in turn creates the market for players, and may lead to undervaluing certain skills.

[ ]

In reply to by big_lowitzki

teams have been aware of ob% for decades...it shows at contract time. what the A's did was overblown as hell, and what was accomplished before the "celebration" layed out in the book made the A's look stronger than what was spelled out in the book. the "grade" the A's have gotten from what was celebrated in the book and afterwards has been mediocre at best. TB has been quietly living the Moneyball reality top to bottom while the A's can't even wheel spin or march their way back up in a 4-team division. maybe their minor league system could use more PEDs. and yeah, there's more to moneyball than hiring a bunch of guys who can't run or hit for contact well that can walk 30 more times than their peers.

Since the Tigers are obviously going all-in now with this latest move, does that mean there's still hope they might trade for Garza? They're one solid SP away from matching up with the Yankees and Rangers pretty damn well. Send us Turner and Castellanos (who is now blocked at 3B) for Garza and we'll call it a deal. Other than Garza, Oswalt is about the only other remaining option out there, and I thought I read he doesn't want to pitch in Detroit for some reason. Unfortunately, Detroit's move does mean there is now a zero market for Soriano, we're either stuck with him or Ricketts will need to eat the entire $54MM.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Guh, didn't see that......Garza is the prize, why the hell would the Cubs send money to the Tigers Aaron? Plus a useful lefty reliever? Nutty indeed. Regarding my original post, I suppose Toronto might conceivably still be interested in Garza, but I don't know that they have the prospects that are as interesting as what Detroit has to offer. The Nats might conceivably be a trade partner, they seem committed to improving NOW and they missed out on several high-profile free agents. And I guess the Angels might be a remote possibility if they panic now that Darvish is signed. On a different note--it is stunning how much the top talent in baseball has shifted to the AL in recent years. Junior circuit in name only. Honestly, you can count the marquee players in the NL at this point on two hands.

Recent comments

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I THINK I agree with that decision. They committed to Wicks as a starter and, while he hasn’t been stellar I don’t think he’s been bad enough to undo that commitment.

    That said, Wesneski’s performance last night dictates he be the next righty up.

    Quite the dilemma. They have many good options, particularly in relief, but not many great ones. And complicating the situation is that the pitchers being paid the most are by and large performing the worst - or in Taillon’s case, at least to this point, not at all.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Wesneski and Mastrobuoni to Iowa

    Taillon and Wisdom up

    Wesneski can't pitch for a couple of days after the 4 IP from last night. But Jed picked Wicks over Wesneski.