Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

John Henry is mad about premature media reports?

 

So it's come to this.
Apparently Boston Red Sox owner John Henry got mad and is further delaying the Theo Epstein to the Cubs deal because of "premature media reports"?

Sit back and put yourself in the shoes of a Boston Red Sox owner.
Your team gags at the end of the season and doesn't even get in the playoffs - the biggest slow motion choke in the history of baseball.
Your manager leaves amid rumors of pill popping and perhaps a lack of leadership.
You hear rumors your team was ordering Popeye's and drinking in the clubhouse during games.
And your general manager wants to leave what was just a couple years ago a world championship team and organization to go to the most famous loser franchise in baseball.

John Henry's not mad about any stupid premature media reports.
He's mad because his toy broke and he's lashing out.

I heard that Bud Selig may go try to be the adult at the negotiations and save the day.

Whatever.
Honestly, I can't wait to hear what the hangup turns out to be, and surely the Cubs won't be portrayed very nicely, either.
My guess is it will be something silly.

 

Comments

As Rob and I argue about the value of getting Theo into the office as soon as humanly possible, it made me wonder what the guys on staff are doing. Do you suppose Ari Kaplan has suddenly become the most popular guy in the office? Knock, knock: "Hey Ari, have you got some time to show me about this Sabermorphics this week?" From Ari's website: Ari combines technology, statistical analysis and business acumen for a fresh look at evaluating players for maximum return on a baseball club’s investment both on and off the field. He has worked with some of the top-tier baseball Managers, coaches, and players to understand strengths, weaknesses, and habits of players. It sounds like a good part of his work may be in evaluating the kinds of returns a free agent will bring, both on the field and in marginal revenue.

Nothing preventing the Cubs from doing the (probably easy) deal with Moorad for Hoyer and installing him as GM, except that Epstein might prefer they wait a little longer. (He wants to get on with his life, too.) Once the Cubs have Hoyer, it's an untenable situation for the Bosox. The Cubs have a new GM, they're still waiting.

I jumped another 1800 spots on the season ticket waiting list this year, after jumping about 2700 the year before that. I moved up a total of 65 spots the three years prior to that.

[ ]

In reply to by Leningrad Cowboy

I'm been on the list since sometime around 2004-05. The only way I seem to make decent progress toward the top is following a hopeless season. But even after 2006 I didn't really move up much. So if this franchise can put together any kind of reasonable streak of success under Epstein, I may not even get a call for a few decades yet.

Under Epstein's guidance, Boston went 839-619 (.575) in the regular season and 34-23 in the playoffs, winning more than 90 games in all but two seasons.

Theo's first move? Bob Howry signed as pitching coach, Stevie Eyre signed as pitching coach for left handers. Howry: "My philosophy is to throw only fastballs." Eyre: "We need more guys like John Grabow. I saw a flaw in his mechanics and he should be fine now."

I don't remember who posted this URL, but there's a funny bit in it:
With Gonzalez entering his walk year and determined to test free agency unless he got a deal he couldn't refuse, Hoyer dealt him to the Red Sox for three prospects and utility man Eric Patterson, who for the Padres did more harm than good, both on the field and for team chemistry.
http://insidethepadres.blogspot.com/2011/10/hoyer.html

[ ]

In reply to by Old and Blue

I think Epstein out-negotiated his former protege in the Gonzalez talks. For the Padres, the trade will be defined by how prospects Antony Rizzo, Casey Kelly and Reymond Fuentes perform. None, at present, is viewed by non-Padres scouts as a good bet for stardom. Among some scouts, Fuentes needs a bounceback year to regain prospect status.. tough crowd... Rizzo in a half season at age 21, put up a OPS over 1.000 in AAA with 26 HR's in 413 PA's, near a 10% walk rate and about a 20% K rate for his minor league career. Kelly wasn't his normally dominating self in AA, but certainly not a bad season. http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=kelly-001cas

Edgar Renteria, Daisuke Matsuzaka, Carl Crawford, and John Lackey. Crawford is especially disturbing. It's Boston's Soriano, maybe worse because Crawford's assets are built around speed and defense, and he's 30. You guys out there know better than I but I seem to remember that being a 7 year contract - too lazy to look it up. Levine on espn.chicago was trying to suggest the Cubs need to go after CJ Wilson, who wants a ton of money and surely a long term contract. I really don't know much about the guy, other than what I see in the stats, and he's had 2 good seasons of 200+ inning baseball. Prior to that, no more than 74 innings. I assume he was a reliever before. I don't like long term contracts to any pitcher, really, and it's one area where it's important to develop the farm system. Something Hendry actually did well for a little while. I'm not going to be one of those who gets excited about a CJ Wilson signing. Theo has his work cut out for him if he wants this team to turn it around any time soon. I hope he (and we) show a little patience and doesn't make any dumb ass long term signings.

[ ]

In reply to by Old and Blue

Crawford was 28 when he signed a 7-year deal (through his 35 season). Soriano was 30 when he signed an 8 year deal (through his 38 season). To make a rough comparison, how much more would you have liked the Soriano deal if it just expired? Wilson is going to get ace money, but he's really a #2 starter (and yes, he was a reliever prior to 2010). Sabathia who is old (30) and probably will get a six year ($150 million) deal if he opts out and Darvish, who may not get posted but will probably cost something approximating Daiske's contract ($110 million) are the only ace caliber starters on the market. The Cardinals may not re-up Wainwright, but I expect they will. That being said, there's no ace pitching in the world series. How fun would it be if the Cubs signed Sabathia (.627 OPS) and got Dontrelle Willis (.665) to go along with Carlos Zambrano (.646), though?

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

He's an ace and recognized by myriad baseball writers and managers as such. I guess that "Ace" is somewhat subjective b/c there is no definitive, absolutely agreed upon definition by every person, connected with the sport. He performs on the big stage, like other "Aces" have done throughout baseball history - not like Ryan Dempster. Many evaluators and armchair GM's like yourself (well, not like you) will go by Whip, K/BB, and era. AND, the intangibles of how tough the pitcher is under duress. Zach Grienke is an "Ace" and imploded when the team needed him the most. Give me Carpenter any day. CY + 2nd in CY 2009. Here is his Post-Season resume: 4 Seasons (9 Series) 8 2 .800 3.10 Including a .643 WHIP in 2 WS starts. We'll have to agree to disagree.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

I guess the bottom line is that I'd be a crummy GM these days. Free agency is such a huge risk. I'd be nervous at almost any signing, even Albert. Who I consider an amazing player. At some point, you just have to take the plunge, and yeah, I'd like the Soriano deal ok if it just expired. I even really actually liked it at the time, but I did think it was a huge roll of the dice. Hendry gambled that they could win it all and he lost.

[ ]

In reply to by Old and Blue

Both Crawford and Lackey had excellent stats before the signing. Sure the deal for Crawford was too long but there was no reason to expect he would fall off this fast. If he had continued to perform even close to what he had before coming to Boston the Red Sox would be in the playoffs and if they won another World Series no one would care if he wasn't that good in 3 or 4 years. Trying to blame Theo for these players completely falling off is some major revisionism in my opinion. While 2007 was certainly an outlier for Lackey, he had nothing lower than a 115 ERA+ before going to Boston. He dipped a tiny bit in 2009 but I don't like using one year to judge someone good or bad (Cubs seem to think if someone has one good year, you should sign them for lots of money). Carl Crawford, outside of 2008, consistently had an OPS+ of over 110. Very good batting average, not great OBP but not bad. I would have supported both signings for the Cubs if we had a team where a couple signings like that would get us to the World Series because you already have so many other pieces. Red Sox had that.

[ ]

In reply to by johann

I'm not slamming the whole Theo thing, I'm just aware that he's not God, and fixing the Cubs is gonna be a tough nut for him to crack. I'm glad about what the Cubs are doing right now. I feel strongly that Ricketts is putting together a good team of professionals to fix a very bad organization. I'm pretty hopeful that the team will get some better teachers into the minor leagues, that kind of thing. I'm also a realist when it comes to modern free agency. Crawford was not a good signing IMO, but Boston was pretty stacked, and they can actually afford a signing like that. Last year's drop off may have also been an aberration. He may bounce back. It would have sucked if the Theo deal had fallen through. Now all the guy has to do during his 5 year contract is bring a World Series to the Cubs. Piece of cake.

So @LynchieWCVB reports Cubs prez Crane Kenney was holding up Theo talks 'for his own interests' and is in hot water with Commish #redsox He atleast deserves a shoe to the sack.

Just to put in perspective the kind of player Theo was signing to Boston before he collapsed, here is Lackey before Boston vs Garza with ERA+: Lackey: 2006 129 2007 150 2008 119 2009 115 Garza 2006 78 2007 117 2008 119 2009 110 Lackey had been the better pitcher. Sure he's making a lot more money, but if you have the money to spend and know your team is good enough to win a World Series and spending all that money can help that happen how can you possibly say that's a bad move? The bad move is when you give a contract like that on a team that doesn't have much chance of winning a World Series. I would just like to know how Theo could have predicted such a fall off and how he can possibly be blamed. I can guarantee you if the Cubs were oh so close to winning a World Series and could sign a pitcher putting up those kind of numbers even if it were for too much money but with a very good chance they could help us win it all now and for the next couple years we would back it. Especially if the payroll and roster were such that it wasn't preventing us from filling real needs at other positions.

http://m.espn.go.com/mlb/story?storyId=7134646 "But I love playing in Chicago. I love being a Chicago Cub, and I want to be here for the rest of my career. I'm happy that Theo is going to be in charge now and really looking forward and excited and getting an opportunity talk with him. And hopefully it's not just picking up an option for this year, but I'll go out there and play the best I can and be here for a long time."

via rotowurld: "Jamie Moyer (elbow) still plans on playing in 2012." ... "The lefty has been throwing 60-pitch bullpen sessions and will soon contact teams that might want to watch him throw." via crunch: "VIVA MOYER! HELL YEAH, DUDE." he turns 49 next month, btw...julio franco, take that...satchel paige, you're next.

[ ]

In reply to by George Altman

I don't think the solution to Z is to get a manager who won't put up with his act. The solution to Z is to minimize the effect of his act. Had the Cubs not made a gigantic issue of him leaving the clubhouse, or had just lied and said that he was given permission, they wouldn't have nearly the issue they had. Of course they went out and smeared him in addition, but other teams have this kind of things happen all the time and just keep it all in house. If the guy ever wants to pitch again he has to put it all out there next season. You have to keep him and let him be your #3 starter behind Garza and Dempster. You'll never get him to be more self motivated than in a contract year, even if he says he'll retire.

Recent comments

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.