Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Tony Campana is fast.

 

Honestly?
There was NO WAY the Cubs could beat the Brewers 2 nights in a row.
None.
We're allowed one shiny W maybe once a week - I'm totally used to it.
So when it went extra with Jeff Sam coming in, I turned it off.
(Doesn't help that I have the Summer Lung Fungus that's going around, but there you go.)

Turned on computer this morning and well, lookie there.
I guess Campana turned a single into a double, Fukudome moved him to third, and then Starlin Castro knocked him in with his 3rd hit of the night.

I wish I could take Campana more seriously, like one more hit every couple games, maybe a walk now and then (he's only got one in 22 at bats...)
But he definitely scares the CRAP out of people, and that's just more fun to watch.

You notice he doesn't really run through the bag at first?
He does that stretch thing and brakes immediately.
I wish he'd just fly on through and see if he's not ohhhh, maybe .004/second faster. 

Anyway, Cubs 5 Brewers 4.
Freaky.

And a tip of the hat to Brewer manager Ron Roenicke for keeping "I just gave up two doubles in a row" reliever Marco Estrada in there and throwing to Aramis.  
Boom, as they say. 

Comments

[ ]

In reply to by jacos

The team is so bad and farm system so thin that I kind of think the Cubs should just take a pass on both Pujols and Fielder this off season and try to get some bad money off the books before buying top-dollar free agents. On the other hand, I'm sort of Cub-depressed right now, so I might not be thinking clearly.

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

I'm more interested in Bour. Seems like 2012 is a good year to use Colvin, Soto, or even Ridling, LaHair or Flaherty at 1B and see what they've got. I don't see this team competing next year unless they get really lucky and a bunch of prospects and young players have breakouts.

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

I find Ridling as interesting as Julio Zuleta. Bour is 2-3 years away of being any kind of impact. If he continues doing what he's been doing, he could see the majors by next year I guess, but feels like a guy that would take a bit to adjust. Also feels like a guy that the cubs wouldn't give much of a leash unfortunately.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

So....RE-Ridling-Zuleta......What makes you think of Zuleta Rob? He's a little old for AA....but it's not like it's his third season there or anything. He's steadily, if not spectacularly moved up a level each year. Meh...I'm just saying, it's nice to have players doing something positive in the minors who aren't 29-33 year old guys hanging on at Iowa. Agreed on Bour, if he got up next season....he'd get the Kieschnick treatment:here's 100 atbats....what? you're not hitting .350/.450/.550??? Demoted.....

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

random reference to a pudgy first basemen that no one thinks too highly of except Ridling's parents and the Cub minor league freaks that attach themselves to anyone that doesn't completely suck. I wish him the best of course, but when your ceiling is the bench, don't get too excited. He's certainly not gonna be anything more than a cheap, below average first basemen in the majors if everything goes right for him. And the fact that he hits from the right side is going to seriously deter his chances of getting much of a shot to be a regular first basemen anywhere. The right handed hitting first basemen usually have much higher ceilings that are afforded the chance to prove themselves.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Submitted by Rob G. on Wed, 06/15/2011 - 11:35am. well I do like Bour, well at least the 277 PA's this year by him. K, BB rates are solid, showing serious power, just has to keep it going up the ladder ============================== ROB G: Justin Bour finally has developed a power stroke and that's good (he learned it at AZ Instructs last fall), but he still REALLY struggles versus LHP. Right now he would project as a LH platoon guy who can only play 1B (and he's just barely passable there). Matt Spencer also struggles to hit LHP (although not as much as Bour does), but at least he can play 1B and all three OF positions (albeit CF only in a pinch). I could see Spencer being a LH platoon 1B-OF-PH in the big leagues eventually. Rebel Ridling is an above-average defensive 1B and is probably a better hitter than either Bour or Spencer, but a RH hitting 1B needs to hit home runs, and I'm not sure that Ridling will ever hit quite enough of them to make it as an MLB 1B. Also, his doubles are way down this season, and two-baggers were always his specialty. He's got to rack up a lot of XBH to advance.

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

Ridling's doubles are down because his at-bats are down. Last year and the year before he hit 34 doubles, this year he has 8; but his slugging pct. is higher this year than in previous years. Almost at the halfway mark, he only has 202 at-bats. With 9 home runs, he should top his previous high of 16. Everyone scrambles for at-bats Tennessee. Ridling has played first in 39 games, but Vitters is listed there in 21 games and Lalli 19. Ridling has played left in parts of 23 games. It's musical positions, because of the talent mix and maybe also the manager's philosophy.

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

Ridling's doubles are down because his at-bats are down. That would be interesting, if it were true. Too bad it is complete bullshit. Ridling has averaged one double for every 25.25 at-bats this year. Last year (2010) he averaged one double for every 13.8 at-bats. For his minor league career he has averaged one double for every 15.9 at-bats.

[ ]

In reply to by big_lowitzki

I should have said, his doubles are down because his at-bats are down and his home runs are up. (Ridling has a home run every 22 at bats, compared to every 35 at bats in the previous two seasons.) Actually I did say that, but apparently not clearly enough to meet your strict--not to say pissy--criteria.

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

Optimism as in I'm glad the Cubs have a draft pick, that is moving steadily through the system, and is playing well in his first attempt in AA..after such luminaries at 1B there as Matt Craig, Jake Fox, Russ Canzler, Blake Lalli, Doug Deeds, Brian Dopirak..etc

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

Canzler has a .909 OPS at Durham this year, the same AAA team as Guyer and Chirinos. But he can't play third in the majors (.866 career FP), so, as Rob says, he's just another righty-hitting 1B wannabee. Anyway, Canzler's another pre-Wilken pick. Usually the Wilken guys have a little added value somewhere, which I'm hoping is true of Ridling. Of the names you mention, I still like Lalli. Solid lefty hitter, doubles power, tends to hit cleanup, can also play third and catch. Lalli is Wilken-era but was undrafted! People are forgetting that Vitters plays one game at first for every two at third, so he is also in the mix for first base next year. Also, I wouldn't rule out Pena.

[ ]

In reply to by Dusty Baylor

the only interesting thing about Lalli is he takes walks and doesn't strike out a lot. Seems like a decent bet to keep up an okay average and OBP. He's been in AA now for 3 years though and no home run power. I forget what AZ phil says about his receiving skills, but there's a long line of backup catchers in the organization.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Blake Lalli is kind of a "catch-and-throw" type catcher, but he's a bit stiff behind the plate. He's more of a third-catcher type whose best position is 1B. He can also play 3B. He's certainly an accomplished AA hitter, though. (Of course he's been there since 2008). He's never had the chance to play at AAA because the Cubs utilize him as a player-coach-mentor at Tennessee, and he doesn't seem to mind. He'll probably be a minor league coach or manager eventually (and since he's 28, eventually could be next year).

Castro does the stretch thing and brakes immediately too. He's gonna hurt himself.

http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/news/story?id=6663709 "But the Ricketts family might not have deep enough pockets for a premier free agent, at least right now. Multiple reports said that Pujols turned down a contract in the range of eight years and $200 million from St. Louis. A source told the Sun-Times that the debt structure of the 2009 Ricketts deal to buy the Cubs precludes that kind of outlay for two or three years."

This season is flying by Cubs optimistic about second half of 2011 With young talent rising in system, future bright on North Side By Carrie Muskat / MLB.com | 06/15/11 2:41 AM ET

[ ]

In reply to by Rob Richardson

anyone who writes for a national news/blog/whatever organization that mentions d.barney as a piece of the cubs future isn't qualified to write about the cubs. i think the guy is neat, but if it wasnt for the injuries, early b.dewitt suck, and 10000 errors committed early on (and still being committed because 2nd wasn't the problem) we probably wouldn't be seeing much of d.barney.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

Submitted by crunch on Wed, 06/15/2011 - 4:57pm. anyone who writes for a national news/blog/whatever organization that mentions d.barney as a piece of the cubs future isn't qualified to write about the cubs. i think the guy is neat, but if it wasnt for the injuries, early b.dewitt suck, and 10000 errors committed early on (and still being committed because 2nd wasn't the problem) we probably wouldn't be seeing much of d.barney. ========================================= CRUNCH: Baseball America had Darwin Barney rated #12 among their Top 10 Cubs prospects this past off-season (that's pre-Garza trade, with Barney moving up to #9 after the trade), and I've had Barney among my Top 15 Cubs Prospects for the last two years (#14 pre-2010 and #15 pre-2011). The problem is that Barney's value is as a shortstop, not as a second-baseman. And what's frustrating watching the Cubs this season is that Barney is actually a better defensive SS than Castro, and Castro is better defensively at 2B than he is at SS (I saw him play a lot of 2B, SS, and 3B in the AZL in 2008), but the Cubs won't switch them because I guess they figure eventually Castro will end up back at SS (probably with LeMahieu at 2B), and they don't want to mess with Castro's head by moving him to 2B and then later moving him back to SS. As I've said all along, Barney is no slouch as a shortstop. I firmly believe he will be an everyday SS in the big leagues, but just probably not with the Cubs. I think he will get traded within a year or two.

[ ]

In reply to by Arizona Phil

"What's frustrating watching the Cubs this season is that Barney is actually a better defensive SS than Castro, and Castro is better defensively at 2B than he is at SS." I agree that Barney is the better SS and that his value in a trade would be higher at SS. Here's my question: So what? Castro is the 800-lb. gorilla, as in: "I have an 800-lb. gorilla at home." --Where does he sleep? "Wherever he wants." A player is not happy playing 2B for X-team when he could be playing SS for Y- or Z-team. You could tell Castro to move over to second, but he would have a short career as a Cub.

[ ]

In reply to by VirginiaPhil

Submitted by VirginiaPhil on Thu, 06/16/2011 - 8:55am. "What's frustrating watching the Cubs this season is that Barney is actually a better defensive SS than Castro, and Castro is better defensively at 2B than he is at SS." I agree that Barney is the better SS and that his value in a trade would be higher at SS. Here's my question: So what? Castro is the 800-lb. gorilla, as in: "I have an 800-lb. gorilla at home." --Where does he sleep? "Wherever he wants." A player is not happy playing 2B for X-team when he could be playing SS for Y- or Z-team. You could tell Castro to move over to second, but he would have a short career as a Cub. =================================== VA PHIL: So what? Well, there are very few ways the Cubs can improve their defense (one of the worst in baseball) in-house, but one way would be to play Barney at SS and Castro at 2B. Castro played 2B, SS, and 3B at EXST, AZL, and AZ Instructs in 2008 and looked best at 2B. That's his best position. 2B. That's what.

[ ]

In reply to by Dr. aaron b

I wouldn't play any of them at SS. I'd find a boring journeyman SS who 1. knows the strike zone and 2. makes the routine plays every time and will occasionally make the tough play. Then I'd send Castro back to the minors and marvel at his batting numbers until he improves defensively. Maybe he could get a AAA batting title or something. But I've already done my Castro defense rant several times in the past. I promise this will be the last.

[ ]

In reply to by Dr. aaron b

I thought you wanted a philosophy change? White/Tim Wilken not all that dissimilar and I don't think Marlins are all that saber-inclined. Not that those aren't good names, but I'd rather they pillage the Red Sox organization or something similar. If they just want an old baseball guy, pay Pat Gillick whatever he wants.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Red Sox organization has already been pillaged. Hoyer is who I would have wanted the Cubs to get. Beinfest has consistently been a winner in a tougher division with about a quarter of our payroll. I think He'd be an excellent choice to be the Gillick/McFail/Schierholtz type of President. Logan White as GM Wilken can stay as Scouting Director. Then maybe a sabr inclined assistant GM like DePodesta?

the Ricketts comment was that he's not interested in hiring a baseball guy to oversee the baseball guy who oversees another baseball guy. maybe Paul McCartney can play first bass next year.

Recent comments

  • Charlie (view)

    Tauchman obviously brings value to the roster as a 4th outfielder who can and should play frequently. Him appearing frequently at DH indicated that the team lacks a valuable DH. 

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?