Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Don't Underestimate the Cubs: They Can Make a Mess of Anything

After all these years, I should know better than to underestimate the Cubs' ability to screw things up, but each time they do, I am somehow sickened anew. This 10-week, all-expenses-paid farewell tour of the National League granted to Lou Piniella is just the latest example.

For weeks, for as long as the least intelligent fan among us has known that the Cubs had no prayer of reaching the post-season this year, players and management alike have cried out, "There's a ton of talent in this lockerroom. We're not out of this race until there's an 'X' next to our name in the standings!" That sort of drivel.

As of the other day, however, this never-say-die franchise is under the stewardship of a 66-year-old manager ("almost 67," Lou pointed out to us) who has looked disconnected from virtually the start of the season ("Look, fellas, I'm out of answers. I really am."). Jim Hendry explained that after a long, distinguished career as a player and World Series-winning manager, Lou "deserves" to go out on his own terms.

My question is, what do Cub fans deserve? Don't we at least deserve to see what would happen if this comically awful circus troupe might perform better if it sensed some urgency; if it was under the direction of someone driven by his own hunger to turn an interim manager title into something more lasting? 

I'll answer my own question—we absolutely deserve that much.

Regarding the endorsement Jim Hendry received from the Chairman on the day of the Piniella press conference...

As Rob G. wrote in the comments, the fact that Hendry, whose teams have now failed to win a single post-season game in seven years, will now be hiring his third Cubs manager is frankly unbelievable. I have nothing else to add there.

Finally, regarding the Hall of Famer in the room...

I'm already tired of hearing Ryne Sandberg invoke his four years of service at Peoria and Des Moines as proof of his fitness for a job that has crushed managers with much more experience and much more impressive managerial resumés. Sandberg somehow conveys an air of entitlement and embarrassing desperation at the same time. I would love to see him NOT get the Cubs' job if only to learn for certain if the rest of Major League Baseball is as convinced of Sandberg's managerial potential as #23 is.

I suppose there's always that job in Baltimore.

 

 

Comments

disagree that sandberg acts entitled and/or embarrassingly desperate & think he is worthy of admiration for his willingness to go almost directly from cooperstown back to the bush leagues & start over...as for what we cub fans deserve, maybe a team that plays commensurate to its collective salary...

[ ]

In reply to by Mike Wellman

Mike, Appreciate your point of view given that you are watching Sandberg on a daily basis. (Funny that your post and mine went up almost simultaneously and offered such different points of view.) My read on Sandberg is based on the way he is coming across in the Chicago press, which also might explain the relatively tepid reaction his candidacy seems to be getting here. (You said you wondered about that in your post.) I feel like Sandberg has been campaigning for this job for a very long time, and that feels desperate to me. By contrast, Alan Trammel said he is not interested in discussing the job via the press and even Brenly, who interviewed for the position when Piniella got it and has been open about wanting to get back on the field, is tip-toeing around the subject and saying things like, "I would be happy to discuss the job with the Cubs if that makes sense at some point." I will admit to my cynicism. I got sick of the way the John McDonough-era Cubs turned so many of the ex-players (e.g., Santo) into mascots, and I would hate to think the Ricketts regime would follow the same course with this first managerial hire.

[ ]

In reply to by Cubnut

I don't read desperation in Sandberg's statements, but rather determination. This is the job he wants. He said that 4 years ago. He asked what he needed to do to get it. They told him to manage in the minors. He said, fine, I'll do that and will be successful. He has been. Now he wants the job. Is he supposed to say "Well, I would be happy to discuss it with Jim when the time comes." No. That would be stupid. We all know where he stands. He is not bullshitting us. For me, this is refreshing. Sandberg has set a goal, made it public, worked hard, done well, and will likely soon achieve it. This is an attitude that is missing a lot on the Cubs. The Cubs always lack hunger. We always criticize the team and manager for looking flat. We get managers who want to manage the Cubs after the Cubs offer them salaries higher than everyone else and huge payrolls. I bet if you offered him the lowest salary of any major league manager to manage the Cubs next year, he'd probably take it. Think about that. Jeez. I hope he gets the job. I like it. If a player wants to improve his defense, Sandberg can say, "well, show up two hours early tomorrow to work with the coaches." If the player protests, Sandberg can say "I rode buses for 4 years to get this job, if you want something you will have to work too." As with all things Cubs, it could fail colossally for a number of foresee and unforeseen reasons. But I am all for trying it. Hiring some of the best/highest paid managers in baseball hasn't worked. Let's hire the hall of fame player who is dedicated to the franchise and see if he can whip it into shape.

points taken - i just think the essence of sandberg's 'campaign' is grunt work & on the job training @ the minor league level...agree w/ your cynicism re: mascotizing former players for marketing purposes, but also think managerial hires are often crapshoots; recent past w/ celebrity types hasn't gotten us to the promised land...in any case, as i said, i am not unequivocally beating ryno's drum; just suggesting if they go one direction he makes sense; if they stay the course of megadeals for FA's he probably doesn't - either way, i respect & admire his approach to the game & think it is an antidote in some ways to cynicism...

[ ]

In reply to by Ryno

I don't know much about Wedge, but I am hoping that Brenly gets the job and Sandberg gets a bench coach job. I have two concerns with Sandberg: 1) What kind of in game manager is he? Will he bunt a ton like Baylor? Maybe this is a small issue - not THAT many decisions for a manager to make. 2) How will he be able to deal with the overpaid athletes that he hasn't had to manage yet. I seem to remember him as a Derrek Lee type in the locker-room. Not overly outspoken, lead by example - I was young when he was playing so I have no facts to base this on. But I don't know how that leadership style will play out with guys like Soriano, Zambrano, Ramirez. So far he's only had to handle players who are motivated as hell to get to the next level. These guys already have their money. Vote Brenly!!!

I want nothing more than Ryne Sandberg to lead the Cubs where we all want them to be led to. I fear though he'll fail miserably like every other Cub manager and will do so by doing a lot of things I find stupid when managing a game...and then my childhood will forever be ruined. They already took Transformers, GI Joes and Star Wars away from me...stop at my sports heroes. At least Walter Payton had the good grace to die (Rest in Peace Sweetness) before he got dragged through the mud.

What I don't want is to see them just give the job to Sandberg. I want a thorough examination of candidates. There are a lot of decent candidates out there who would like to be considered, some with major league managing experience (including Trammell and Brenly). They should interview them all, determine which way this team is going to be put together over the next 2-3 years, and determine which guy suits that determination best. If Sandberg is the best candidate after that process, fair enough. If he's not, they need to go with the guy that is the best candidate after they go through the process.

how does a team screw up hiring a manager besides either 1- paying him like he actually plays 2- hiring a guy who can't manage personalities? #1 doesn't even really effect the cubs badly since they're spending so much money... we go through this every time we kick our last "next big thing" out. hell, almost every team does. people think a manager is gonna do something or make grown young men with millions do something. everyone's looking for the f'n winston churchhill of baseball it seems. what are you people basing decent candidates on? can they speak spanish? can they communicate with various types of people in a way they'll understand? how are they going to handle a player going rogue? what's their temper? what's their past experience with the game? seriously? how much does it matter?

Recent comments

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.