Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, ten players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, two players are on the 15-DAY IL, and two players are on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-17-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Keegan Thompson
Hayden Wesneski 
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
* Miles Mastrobuoni
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 10 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 

10-DAY IL: 2 
Seiya Suzuki, OF
Patrick Wisdom, INF 

15-DAY IL: 2
* Justin Steele, P  
Jameson Taillon, P 

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Cubs in Baseball America Top 100 Prospects

The Baseball America Top 100 prospects list for 2010 is out. Here is where the Cubs placed:

Starlin Castro - 16th
Josh Vitters - 70th
Brett Jackson - 74th
Andrew Cashner - 95th
Jay Jackson - 98th

Once again, Baseball America flips some prospects on their top 100 list from their top 10 organization lists. In this case, they had Brett Jackson #2 and Vitters #3 on the Cubs list, but ranked Jackson below Vitters on their top 100 list. It's happened a few times in the past as well.

The five Cubs are the most placed on the top 100 since 2008. Castro at 16th is the highest Cubs ranking since Mark Prior and Juan Cruz were 2nd and 6th in all of baseball in 2002. It's the highest position ranking since Corey Patterson landed 3rd and 2nd in 2000 and 2001. You can always view past lists at Wiklifield.

Comments

rated as his best tool, got a 75 grade (out of 80). others on the list: Jackson: Fastball, 60 Vitters: Power, 65 Jackson: Power, 65 Castro: Bat, 65

Most of the players on the list crapped out. Is that a reflection of the Cubs ability to develope talent or BB America's ability to put list together. I suspect a bit of both. I wonder how other organizations would measure up on prospects developing.

[ ]

In reply to by DavidP

zambrano and a slew of other pitchers, too. i would count mark prior, but mark prior didn't need a second of coaching. he was ready to go the minute he was signed and his stint in the minors was practically a "can you? well, damn you can." formality

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

From a layperson point of view, it appears the Cubs need some new batting coaches in the minor leagues. It's a reductionist point of view, I know, but only because I don't know how the process of developing a prospect into a major league hitter works. To support this theory we have Geovanny Soto saying he didn't start hitting well until he stopped listening to Cubs coaching. We've seen prospect after prospect fail in the Cubs organization. I would say the Cubs have done an above average job with pitchers.

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

I recall Soto saying he just simply started swinging harder and some stuff about simplfying things. Not sure if there was anything as dramatic as ignoring all previous coaching...but maybe there are some quotes out there.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

The quote below is from USAT but Soto is also on record with SI with the same information. Soto said that when he came up with the Cubs the other catchers all were driving the ball harder than he was capable of and he couldn't compete so they had him Therioting the ball to right field just trying to get base hits. He also said that when he went to the plate he was trying to remember all the various tips the hitting coaches gave him and it made him timid and stiff. Jorge L. Ortiz, USA Today, 7-8-2008
As he approached the 2007 season, his third on the 40-man roster, he felt it was time to swing freely. "I let go of my timidity and would go to the plate more loose," says Soto, who has struck out 78 times but also owns a .373 on-base percentage. "I took it like this was my last chance and I would enjoy the game, play without pressure and let the chips fall where they may."
FWIW other reporters have Von Joshua telling him to start swinging more freely.

Just saw one of the best and original baseball shows in a long time. On MLB network Bob Costas interviewed three retired MLB umps- Bruce Froemming, Palone, and the guy who blew the call against Cards in 85 WS. If you can find it watch it, very interesting perspective and one rarely heard. Called Studio 42 with Bob Costas. Best story- Ump was behind plate in late 70's and Yanks were blowing out a team. Lou was at bat, pitch came over ump just yelled strike. Lou steps out and asks "Do you know where that pitch was at?" Ump-"Lou, you know your not suppose to end a sentence with a preposition?" Lou was stunned, step back in batters box. As pitcher wound up, Lou steps out and calls time. Lou says "Do you know where that pitch was at...a$$hole?"

mcdonald was pretty damn popular with baseball card collectors, but he didn't have a sullivan award, a victory over cuba, or a chunk of the hype of abbott.
McDonald had way more hype than Abbott. He was basically Mark Prior when he was drafted, an absolute sure thing.
the sullivan award is given to the best amateur athlete in the country and it's not a "softball" type of award.
it's also not for being a great baseball player... ...the AAU Sullivan Award goes far beyond athletic accomplishments and honors those who have shown strong moral character. and
i think you underestimate the sullivan award and the buzz it gave him...along with all the buzz before he won it.
Charlie Ward, JJ Reddick are some other past winners...think you might be overestimating a bit there. Actually I'm feel pretty safe in saying your full of shit on this one.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

i have no idea how anyone missed the abbott buzz if they were around to have it shoved in their face. it was a national thing, not a local thing. the guy didn't spend a minute in the minors for a reason. he deserved his sullivan award, too. for the wards and reddicks there's plenty...WAY WAY more on-target marks on their award. this isn't considered a softball award by anyone last time i checked. sure, the guy is a feel-good story, but he was not easy at all to hit on the amateur level and he had a nice olympics to go with his final few college years. teams thought he was MLB-ready out of the box and the one that gave him a chance pretty much confirmed it. just because the guy didn't roll in to get a cy young doesn't mean he wasn't a legit talent. guys just don't waltz into the majors and stick.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

but to pretend abbott wasn't a huge deal or a legit straight-from-college-to-majors talent...i dunno at all about that.
Abbott had tons of hype, never said otherwise, but it wasn't just for his talent...people were intrigued by his story just as much. I'll also add he would have never gone straight to the majors if not for the Olympics. He was drafted in '88, played the Olympics and then had spring training to earn his spot on the team. Had there been no Olympics, he would have undoubtedly played some in the minors in '88. McDonald was the guy everyone thought was going to be the next perpetual Cy Young winner. I remember his first start in '90 being a huge deal, although the O's already had him in the their pen after just 2 outings in the minors in '89. But the O's were still working off the Earl Weaver model of letting pitchers get acclimated in the majors through the pen.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

story or no story you don't get to come to the majors and stay if you don't have "the shit." and seriously...the sullivan is a very legit award. i just count the hype over abbott and his eventual drafting/playing as more similar to the hype for prior...going from "really?" to "really!" before the dude even starts his last year. sure, part of abbott's appeal to the media/fans was his freak show thing, but the guy earned his hype. he was not a side-show when he went straight from draft to the major leagues without a minute in the minors.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

either way it's a decent idea to let lou get in his head if he's an option in fontenot. i'd love to have the luxury of blanco off the bench because his 2nd and SS are both excellent, but i also fear this would just be an excuse to rush castro, too. i'd hope they'd at least use this chance to keep tracy or another power bat around on the bench rather than that, though. from what lou/hendry has said about castro...and the new vet invited pickups...it might work out that way. way too early to say, though. woo spring.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

''Oh, no,'' the manager said, ''We're not going to ask him to do that. We're going to stick with it this way. We're going to keep him in an RBI spot.'' awesome. now all we need is soto to get his bat together. worried about theriot keeping his worth...both running and with his ob%...he relies a lot on smacking singles around. fuku i'm not worried about in the #1 or #2 slot, though it seems he'd be a better #2 hitter, ideally (not whole roster ideally...real use, ideally).

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Soriano is now Cedeno dumb. Look, you have no legs and no batting eye. You are not a leadoff hitter!!! (five more years) You know what you should work on??? (FIVE MORE YEARS) Flailing at breaking pitches 5 feet out of the zone!!!!!!!!!! (FIVE MORE F'NING YEARS) ~deep breath~ First step, when you see the catcher out of the corner of your eye sitting behind the left hand hitters box, be guessing breaking pitch away. Next step, DON'T SWING!!

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

wrong. ...and fail. if you don't have talent to begin with no one cares how nice you are. what part of straight-to-majors-without-minors-or-going-back is lost on you? is your list of 100s of those guys too long to parse? he earned it...get over it.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

with proof? let's see...a packed house in anaheim...media circus...many teams who would be willing to start him straight out of college...international wins over cuba (first in 2+ decades) and japan in pan am and olympics...2 major amateur sports awards... is it worth mentioning a mid-90s fastball or his other stuff? how about his spring training quotes about whether he can make the jump when questioned by others who don't like how he's used 1 arm his whole life? yes, there were multiple teams who thought he could start as-is. i don't run these teams, btw. just to clear that up... it's not bullshit. it's in print for those that missed it. it's that stuff i referenced. i didn't write it. the guy was destined to start right out of being drafted...and he did...and he stuck. you'd think this guy was a freak show with no skills rather than a freak show who had high skills. if this was going on RIGHT NOW none of you would be talking about him like he's a charity case. want me to paste more proof? link more proof? this isn't coming out of thin air.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

let's see...a packed house in anaheim...media circus.. imagine that, the story of a one-armed pitcher in the major leagues receiving media attention many teams who would be willing to start him straight out of college but 7 unwilling to draft him... is it worth mentioning a mid-90s fastball or his other stuff? not really, clearly he could pitch or he wouldn't have made the majors or been drafted 8th overall you'd think this guy was a freak show with no skills rather than a freak show who had high skills. nobody said that want me to paste more proof? link more proof? this isn't coming out of thin air. yes please, post the quotes saying because he won the Sullivan award he was the consensus top pick in the 1988 draft and the only reason he was passed by in the draft was because of his one arm. Also the quotes saying the Sullivan award was just for his on-field contributions. As well as the quotes saying that he would have started right in the majors in 1988 if there were no Olympics and wouldn't have gone to the minors. I didn't say the guy wasn't a talented pitcher or massively hyped, one-armed pitchers with major league talent tend to get that. your contentions though that his talent(not his story) was more hyped than Ben McDonald, that anyone cared about the Sullivan award when trying to project his major league performance or that him making the majors without any minor league games didn't have something to do with playing in the '88 Olympics and having spring training to make the team are bullshit.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

you act like jim abbott didn't have the buzz unless it was about him being a freak. you seem to think he didn't earn his golden spike or his sullivan. you also seem to think the sullivan isn't a major award, but some other sideshow. how many guys do you hear scouts and teams saying "this guy is mlb-ready" and REALLY mean it. seriously? for all the 1-arm stuff, the guy had STUFF. it was legit stuff. the 1-arm crap is a nice story, but if he didn't have legit stuff to go along with it... well... 1- you don't get major awards for it 2- you don't get to start in 2 major international competitions and get to start vs. the hardest teams 3- you don't have teams saying you're ready to go right out of college 4- you don't have the guy in question fielding questions by reporters asking him why some teams think he may not be ready 5- you sure as hell don't stick around if they try you out and you're not ready he's not little timmy from the special olympics or some dude with autism who's really good at shooting free throws. we heard about this dude for 2 years...he won a golden spike as a f'n sophomore. he dominated international competition back when college kids made up team USA and they played against other country's pros. guy had a 95mph fastball and a HARD slider...also a curve. All 3 were refined and everyone knew it. THAT is why he was moved so fast...because he was MLB-ready out of the box. You don't just stumble into that. ...and i never EVER said or hinted "he won the Sullivan award he was the consensus top pick in the 1988 draft" ...and if you think you don't have to have an athletic base to even be considered for the sullivan it must be new award territory for you.

[ ]

In reply to by crunch

you act like jim abbott didn't have the buzz unless it was about him being a freak. no I didn't, clearly he pitched well in the Olympics and international competition and was good enough to be drafted 8th overall. But his "freak" status did make him a lot more interesting to the general public. You think he carried the US Flag in the Olympics while playing for a demonstration sport just because of his talent? you seem to think he didn't earn his golden spike or his sullivan. you also seem to think the sullivan isn't a major award, but some other sideshow. I never once mentioned the golden spike award, now you're just making stuff up. I think the sullivan award is a major award given for talent and leadership and overcoming obstacles. But if he had 2 arms, he wouldn't have won it. how many guys do you hear scouts and teams saying "this guy is mlb-ready" and REALLY mean it. seriously? I hear it all the time. How do you know they REALLY meant it with Abbott? and mlb-ready doesn't necessarily mean he's the most talented or best player fwiw, it's just that his skills are ready for the majors and don't need much refining. for all the 1-arm stuff, the guy had STUFF. it was legit stuff. the 1-arm crap is a nice story, but if he didn't have legit stuff to go along with it... never argued that, not sure why you keep coming back to it. He had good stuff on top of a fascinating story. But there were pitchers who were considered more talented and with higher upsides...like Ben McDonald. ...and i never EVER said or hinted "he won the Sullivan award he was the consensus top pick in the 1988 draft" you did say: i think you underestimate the sullivan award and the buzz it gave him and funny thing is if it wasn't for having 1 hand abbott would have easily been the #1 overall. ...and if you think you don't have to have an athletic base to even be considered for the sullivan it must be new award territory for you. I didn't think they gave it to ballerinas. You seem to think he won it almost exclusively because of his baseball accomplishments and that major league teams gave much of a crap when considering drafting him.

Crunch posting at 3:10 am. Where's my coffee? You know what's a shame? Mordecai "3 fingers" Brown never won the Sullivan Award. There's an injustice. Is Koyie Hill still eligible?

offtopic.... I'm moving to Milwaukee in August. (just found out) I want tickets but the ticket icon on the cubs site isn't available. (for games in september) Does that really mean they are already sold out?

[ ]

In reply to by The Real Neal

middle infielders seemed appropriate to me, that's what Castro is afterall and Smith was curious was other 20-yr old middle infielders did with their careers if brought up that early. That was the question he asked and he answered it for the most part with the 2nd half of it coming tomorrow. He already seemed to acknowledge that he thought Castro would be better than Templeton and fwiw, Tony Fernandez ended up with 39.4 total WAR for his career. But maybe Castro finds some power and maybe he finds second base as well. I'd be thrilled if he turns into Roberto Alomar myself. anyway, no use in me defending someone else's article, he has comments open over there if you have questions or concerns. I just found it interesting, not some holy grail, in the end it's all pretty disposable.

In other news. I need to get resmarted. I just realized I can view new comments merely by reloading the page. I didn't know it'd behave like the 'new comments' button. Now I know. ...and knowing is half the battle.

Boy, that 2004 list doesn't give you much faith in BA's evaluation, does it? Angel Guzman - 26th Justin Jones - 56th Ryan Harvey - 65th Andrew Sisco - 77th Felix Pie - 85th Bobby Brownlie - 92nd

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

His stats just weren't that good, and there was always talk of him moving to the bullpen. He was 68th the previous year, according to Wickifield. You know what would be interesting, is to review the list for guys who are on it 2+ times. My gut instinct is that if you're on it 3 times, you should be moving up it, not down, and your chances of being a significant ML'er are pretty good.

Recent comments

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    I suspect Counsell/Hottovy will use the piggy-back extensively, with Taillon and Hendricks pitching as the "pig" (and with a very short leash) and some combo of Wicks, Brown, and Wesneski (whichever two do not start) as the "backers."  

    Keep in mind that Keegan Thompson has a minor league option available, and if Yency Almonte is not outrighted by 4/26 he cannot be sent to the minors without his consent after that date. Almonte is out of minor league options, so I am talking about him getting outrighted to the minors if he is not claimed off waivers, and if he is claimed off waivers, the Cubs save the pro-rated portion of his $1.9M salary, which helps lower the Cubs 2024 AAV.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Totally agree. The 26 man roster very rarely consists of the 13 best position players and 13 best pitchers.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Based on what Jed has done in the past, I’d say the plan is to

    -give Hendricks another few starts
    -give Taillon some runway ot get his season underway

    -Mix and match in the bullpen and see what sticks

    Jed usually doesn’t do a whole lot of waiver wire plays in-season, at least early in the season. He only reallly did that after he blew up the rosters in 21 and 22 because they needed bodies (guys like Schwindel, Fargas, etc).

    I think he’s a little handcuffed by a full 40 man in that he can’t really maneuver much with giving anyone showing ability at AAA (R Thompson/ Sanders/ Edwards etc). Brewer has the most tenuous grip there, and we will see what kind of chance he gets. Other than his spot, there isn’t a ton of 40 man wiggle room.

    I’m very curious to see what happens with Brown now that Taillon returns. Bullpen? Wicks to Iowa? 

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Pro teams have to play their "big money" guys if they are healthy and not "locker room" issues.
    The Cubs wanted to deal JHey off well before they bought him out. They just didn't want to pay him to play for someone else for that long. Jed did give him 20+mil to play for LAD last yr.
    Jed might also let Kyle walk at some point this year. Similar scenario to JHey, except Jed thought Kyle was going to be good/solid in '24!!
    You'd think Smyly is in the same book as well. Same with Neris (he's a 1yr vet RP, so he's not really in this convo too much).
    That's ~35mil between those three and those three are going to get opportunities until at least late June) over younger guys even if their performance is "iffy".
    But, Jed is going to play Taillon a lot. They have to try and justify that contract and hope a veteran works out.
    So, Taillon, Imanaga, and Hendricks are locks for the rest of April and probably May.
    Assad, Brown and Wicks handle the last spots until Steele is ready.
    Now, you're question has real merit when Steele comes back. That will interesting if Brown is still good and Hendricks is still bad. But Taillon is entirely safe as long as he's healthy.

    And the bullpen moves were "money" based as well. Smyly has actually been okay. But he hasn't been clearly better than Little. Little had one bad outing. But Smyly makes 9mil. If they needed another RHRP and one of Little and Smyly had to go, it was going to Little. But that doesn't mean Smyly is one of the best 13 arms for the team. 

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Childersb3: I think there was an issue with Luke Little coming into a game with men on base. He seems to need a "clean" inning to be dominant. So he is a future closer and needs to be used in that role at AAA. Same goes for Michael Arias. He needs to come into a "clean" inning, and is a future closer and needs to be used in that role at AA. Porter Hodge is a more versatile pitcher, a better version of Keegan Thompson (multi-inning RP). But Little, Arias, and Hodge (probably in that order) are the Cubs top three RP prospects (all three are Cubs Top 15 prospects).

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    So, let’s do a little war gaming. Taillon is back for tonight’s game. He pitched two rehab games, just a few innings each, and not especially sharp. Let’s face it, he hasn’t been lights out since the Cubs gave him the big contract. In other words, as flat out bad as Hendricks has been, the chances of Taillon being the savior don’t look exactly promising.

    If Taillon is equally ineffective or perhaps even worse, what’s the next move? Winning teams can often find a way to work around a dud fifth starter - kinda. Two dud starters make things much more difficult.

    I believe the biggest reason for the recent bullpen moves was dissatisfaction with the recent blowing of big leads and the recognition that the bullpen wasn’t all it was thought to be. In other words, they are exploring alternate options and configurations. If similar juggling becomes necessary (even more so than it already is), what kind of reasonable maneuvering do we think could be explored?

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Cubdom needs to prepare themselves for Wicks to be sent to Iowa for Taillon to come up.
    Ben Brown has 4 appearances. Wicks has 4 appearances.
    Ben has 16.1 IP.  Wicks has 17 IP
    Ben was a 1.1 WHIP.  Wicks has a 1.7 WHIP. Wicks does have significantly more SOs. 
    Ben has been better, though.
    I love Wicks. I think he's a fighter and his stuff has improved.
    But, Jed isn't ditching Hendricks just yet. He should. But he won't.
    Hendricks should go to the IL and Taillon-Imanaga-Assad-Wicks-Brown should be the rotation.
    Wont' happen though.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil,
    Did you agree with the demotion of Luke Little? He'd been pretty good up until the AZ/wild pitch appearance. I know that can't jettison Smyly (just yet) so they didn't need another LHRP. Especially with Leiter effectively being a LHRP. I still thought he deserved to stay. It's not permanent. He'll be back. Lots of moves to come with Taillon, Steele and other guys coming and going.

    Also, do you see Hodge being able to "control/command" his stuff to get a chance this year?
    Is Arias better than Hodge?   Thanks

  • crunch (view)

    just waiting to hear patrick wisdom and masterboney are spotted at the airport going in opposite directions...

    aj puk going for the marlins (lefty)...gotta imagine we'll see wisdom in the lineup.

    someone has to make room for taillon, too.

  • crunch (view)

    he's a low-level cubs star in the modern history of the cubs (c.zambrano, k.wood, r.dempster, etc), but that star has dimmed...and has been dimming since 2021.

    2024 has been ugly the whole way and we're only in mid-april.  homers aside (even though there's been 7 in 17ip) he gave up 29 hits in 20 spring innings and 31 in 17 regular season innings.

    he's pretty much only got 2 pitches at this point in his career and the mix isn't fooling anyone.  he threw a noticable amount more curves in his last start to add to the mix and it didn't help his issues.  he don't have many moves left to break out.