Sale of Cubs May Be Completed Before End of Civilization

Some more news has trickled out on the impending sale of the Cubs and Sam Zell is hinting that the Ricketts may not be the new owner afterall (emphasis added).

"These are very difficult times. These are difficult
times to arrange financing," Zell said in an interview, adding that if
the Ricketts deal falls through, he is confident the media
company--which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in
December--will find another buyer for the ballclub.

"We’ve made it very public that the Cubs don’t fit into the long
term picture of the Tribune," he said. "So if the Ricketts deal doesn’t
get done, I’m sure there will be other ones.
"

Sure, a lot of people have $900M or so lying around to spend on the Cubs as evidenced by the three legitimate bids Zell actually received. Of those three bids, Ricketts was supposedly not the highest but offered the most money up front, so if financing is the issue, a deal that would require even more to be financed is probably not going to have much more luck than the Ricketts are having now.

Of course...financing really isn't the issue it appears. According to this story dated May 19th, the Ricketts already secured a little over $850M of that $900M original bid; $403M from the sale of stock in Ameritrade and another $450M secured in bank loans (Clarification: Technically $753M is secured with a $100M coming from a private placement by Barclays which we do not know the status of, although the Ricketts claim they can cover it if it falls through). There was that story of Ricketts looking for 10 or so investors at $25M a pop, including celebrities like John Cusack, Bill Murray and Jim Belushi, but that round of financing was supposedly not critical to get the deal done according to "sources". Crain's Chicago Business also echoes that the financing is already in place and explains the real delay.

Thomas Ricketts, who is leading his family’s bid for Tribune Co.’s Cubs, has lined up financing for the deal, but a dispute over price is delaying the transaction.


The Ricketts family, whose original bid was close to $900 million, now
believes the real price should be closer to $850 million, a source
said. The sides disagree over the value of the team’s multiyear
contract to broadcast games on Tribune’s WGN network.


At issue is about $40 million to $50 million — roughly 6% of the
original bid, which also includes Wrigley Field and a 25% stake in
regional cable channel Comcast Sports.

So the Ricketts are either short $50M in financing and trying to talk Zell down or they really are unhappy with the broadcast rights. I'm going with option B here. It appears the Tribune made sweetheart deals with WGN radio and television to broadcast the Cubs games at below fair market value for a contract up to 10 years sometime last fall. Ricketts isn't buying any stake of WGN, but is supposedly getting a 25% stake in the Comcast sports channel that already broadcasts about 80 games a year. So naturally, if he owns the cable company he'd like more games to go on there or be sure he's getting paid the appropriate amount in any licensing deal to WGN.

So don't believe the Zell lies, the money is there for Ricketts, Zell just isn't liking the terms.


Hat tip to waxpaperbeercup that has been all over the sale process, also check out Mark Cuban's blog on why he bowed out and wasn't going to pay anything near the $1 billion asking price at this time. End of the world coming Decemeber 21st, 2012...John Cusack (Cub fan) is starring. Coincidence? I think not.

 

Tags: 

Comments

according to SI, Z gets 6 games...hardly worth appealing, imo.

ESPN.com confirms 6 game suspension. Says Z won't appeal.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4213321

Z should shut his trap and appeal. Then when Lou wants him to serve his suspension, he can just drop the appeal.

I agree that's a soft penalty. Kind of makes sense, though, I mean he yelled and threw the ball, but the ump bumped z...

Any suspension for the ump? Didn't that guy who put his hand on Ordonez get suspended?

It looked to me like Z had blocked the plate and he was out, but was watching it at the bar. What's the official TCR opinion on the call?

Consensus seemed to have been that the ump made the right call.

He was safe.

Z blocked the plate nicely and sort of pushed Morgan back, but he did get his left hand in right before the tag or as the tag was being applied...tie going to the runner of course. I believe the Ordonez ump did not get suspended.

And the Soto slide later? I thought that was a makeup call for blowing the Z play.

Soto was safe, he definitely got his hand in before the tag.

Thanks. I was sure he was gonna be out. He needs to go back on that 2007 diet. He's hella slow.

Good Lord. Fuck you, Sam Zell.

It doesn't really bother me. It's not like the new owner is going to be throwing around cash after having dropped $.9 billion on the team. I actually expect payroll to go down over the next three years, unless the Cubs win a WS (hahahaha).

This is ridicules even by Cubs standards that is is taking this long to sell the team. 2.5 years? It would funny if it wasn't so sad. But I wouldn't ultimately care if it wasn't effecting the team and comments from Hendry seems like it is causing at least some problems. I just hope the sale goes through soon, so they don't continue to keep Hendry on for continuity sake.

hendry? really?

c'mon guy...you already got a hand full of straws, no need to grasp onto more to tie him into this as a problem.

huh?

"comments from Hendry seems like it is causing at least some problems"

c'mon...his comments on the situation were light at best...guy has a 140m team to handle.

i get where you're coming from, though.

Yeah, not blaming him in the slightest. I am sure it has been an uneasy few years in the front office with all the uncertainty.

i came down harsh vs. what i was trying to say anyway...sorry. i blame the government.

all things considered...especially considering the 140m payroll and how hands-off Zell has been...i'm pleased with his ownership so far.

Yeah, I think the team is already being run like a 'real owner' would run it. With the possible exception of making an allowance for one big contract at the deadline - but that hasn't been a problem for the last 6 years, so I don't think it's a foregone conclusion that it will be this year. The people at the Trib know they make money when the Cubs ratings and jersey sales go up.

Lineups posted...

CHC - Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire
LAD - Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire, Umpire

I am sure there's a great joke in there, I just don't get it.

Baseball these days is all about the umpire.

i would question why soto was just watching zambrano explode
he should of got his pitcher outta there.

Ask Michael Barrett or the Gatorade machine why he didn't get in there.

(chortle)

good one!

I blame Michael Barrett for the Gatorade machine.

Recent comments

Subscribe to Recent comments
The first 600 characters of the last 16 comments, click "View" to see rest of comment.
  • Hmmm, my math might be fuzzy but if he retired 3 batters with 3 pitches, how did he get a 1/1 GO/AO ratio?

    bradsbeard 49 min 13 sec ago view
  • Pls DFA Peralta when Richard comes back. Richard 1 IP, O R, O ER, 0 BB, 2 Ks in first rehab appearance. We really need to trade for a LHRP.

    chitownmvp01 1 hour 6 min ago view
  • "The Boston Red Sox were banned from signing any international players for the next year and had five of their teenage prospects declared free agents on Friday after a Major League Baseball investigation showed they circumvented signing-bonus rules last year, a source familiar with the situation told Yahoo Sports."

    https://www.yahoo.com/sports/news/source-red-sox-b...

    Rob Richardson 4 hours 45 min ago view
  • The thing with Heyward is its not just free agency. He is way under performing his career #s. He's making the same % of contact but his soft contact is much higher and hard contact much lower than all his previous years so there is something very specifically going on this year causing the issues. Chances are he will eventually get back to his previous #s and it's better to get the slump now and get that hot run later but I wish I knew what is different about this year. He's either just not seeing the ball as well or a swing change is causing it.

    johann 5 hours 1 min ago view
  • Only 3 pitches for Leathersich. Not much of a rehab outing.

    Thanks for the reporting Phil.

    QuietMan 5 hours 13 min ago view
  • He's the nastiest pitcher I've seen in awhile. I'm gonna give them all a mulligan on this one.

    Coghlan's strike out was more disappointing. He was fighting off a lot of pitches and not swinging at crap, and on the last pitch, he swung at stuff he was laying off, and struck out.

    And Heyward, too. I don't blame Heyward - I blame free agency. I hate it. You almost never get a valid return on the investment.

    I look forward to the day when ball players own the teams. The current economics are not sustainable.

    Old and Blue 6 hours 14 min ago view
  • Oh, I'm sure you're right. He's not 27-27 in saves for nothing. But, man, I hope they learned last night that he didn't throw a single pitch in the zone to KB, Contreras or Baez, and they all just kept swinging.

    billybucks 8 hours 22 min ago view
  • Sounds like a much better game than last night's fiasco in Flushing.

    Old and Blue 8 hours 38 min ago view
  • I'm pretty sure it looks like a sweet pitch on the way in. How many sinkers like that are there at 98 mph? I agree that they should just do a Lackey and stand their with their bat on their shoulders until he throws a strike next time, but I can see how that's hard to do.

    The bullpen, on the other hand, is a mess, and Heyward is starting to piss me off.

    Old and Blue 8 hours 39 min ago view
  • I noticed that too. He's getting to everything, but when he gets right under it on a high flyball he looks uncomfortable

    cubbies.4ever 17 hours 13 min ago view
  • Did you expect anything different?

    billybucks 17 hours 44 min ago view
  • Wow, did they blow this game. Stupid plays by the kids in the 7th -- Almora throwing to 3rd instead of 2nd to keep the DP in order (when a DP probably wins the game) and Baez throwing to 3rd (to a backpedalling KB) instead of getting the easy 2nd out at first - cost them the game. Also, Contreras almost throws the ball into RF on a nonexistent pick-off play. And Maddon, for using Peralta in the first place. Did they do a bunch of shots in the dugout before the 7th? Unbelievably bad baseball. I thought Almora had a high baseball IQ?

    billybucks 18 hours 6 min ago view
  • men on 2nd/3rd, 0 out...and nothing.

    cubs lose :(

    crunch 18 hours 38 min ago view
  • UH OH! RALLY TIME!

    crunch 18 hours 48 min ago view
  • Getting tired of this Heywood weak sauce

    jacos 18 hours 59 min ago view
  • Yep, can't say I disagree with that. His first batter and resulting walk was just brutal. Reminded me of a bit of Jacque Jones spiking his throws into the ground from RF.

    Eric S 19 hours 8 min ago view