Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Head in a Word Cloud.

Perhaps you have run into "word clouds," a visual device that represents how frequently different words appear in a text.  As a historian I love it, as I can do fun things like compare Obama's 2008 Democratic National Convention nomination acceptance speech with McCain's from the Republican National Convention.

That's useful stuff.  I can show word clouds like those to my students, and ask them what the clouds do (and do not) reveal.

But who cares about utility.  Let's use some word clouds to navel-gaze, and check out our favorite baseball-related websites.

 

Using the free java application at www.wordle.net I entered the link for The Cub Reporter's RSS feed, and got this:

What does this tell us about ourselves?  Eh, on the one hand, perhaps not much more than a bit of fun navel gazing.  It does look like it's spring training, though.  The most prominent names I see are Micah Hoffpauir, Darwin Barney, Joey Gathright and Marshall.  And it looks like we're a permissive group, we like the word "allowing."  I have no idea why.

 

However, comparing our cloud with that from Carrie Muskat's feed shows some interesting differences

"Cubs" is even more prominent for Muskat than it is for us.  Perhaps not surprising, as selling the team is part of her job description.  But look at that Giant Blue Sutcliffe!  Muskat's readership likely is A. more interested in name-brand Cubs (and ex-Cubs) and B. more interested in human interest stories.  Those differences show up elsewhere in the word cloud:  check out how much more prominent Milton Bradley and his quadriceps are.  LouPa features prominently, as do other marque names like Aramis and Harden.  Forgive me for noticing, and remarking on, the prominence of "Carrie."

If you're really in to self-mutilation, there's Phil Rogers' RSS feed.

 

It doesn't look like Rogers actually talks much about baseball.  Appropriate.

I should credit Rogers, though, as there isn't a larger Tribune Cubs News feed.  Paul Sullivan also doesn't seem to have any sort of news feed.  So instead, I cut and pasted the text of four of his "mailbag" columns into wordle, and got this.  (Wordle will randomly pair different fonts and color schemes and word layout, if you don't specify any.  This layout struck me as quite pretty, so I left it as is.)

I dare you to guess, from this word cloud, what the title is of Paul Sullivan's column.

Both the Sun-Times and the Daily Herald offer Cubs RSS feeds. Here's the Sun-Times' feed.

 

 

Compare that to the Daily Herald's feed.

 

The Sun Times appears to care far more about Milton Bradley.  The Herald, the Cubs.

 

How does TCR compare to Bleed Cubbie Blue?  Here's their word cloud.

 

 

I'm not interested in any BCB/TCR rivalry:  It's a big enough fan-base to support both of us.  But there are interesting differences.  BCB's word cloud includes a lot more, well, internet-y words like "post" and "comment" and "link". TCR's wordle word cloud more closely resembles "traditional" news media with a higher preponderance of player names and baseball-event sort of words. 

Like many of you, I read Fan Graphs religiously. Here's the word cloud on their feed.

 

Look much like a sabrmetric site?

 

 

Comments

Yes, I know that my clouds broke the normal margins and formatting and all that stuff.

 

No, I don't know how to fix it.  Rob will spank me, later; it's part of the little games we play.

 

 

Interesting post Trans. I've never seen a word cloud before. Cool stuff.

Trans, you glorious word cloud-gazing bastard...

Love it. I, too, played the Obama/McCain game during the campaign, though I used op-ed pieces they wrote on consecutive days for the Wall Street Journal, right before the election. It was illuminating, as are all of these. (The historian in you might also enjoy running the Gettyburg Address or the Declaration of Independence through this sort of analysis.)

What I take from the Phil Rogers cloud--he can't believe he is lucky enough to have a job that takes him to Arizona.

[ ]

In reply to by Cubnut

Ha, yeah, I also gathered that about Mr. Rogers.

 

I haven't started collecting them yet, as I just in the last week realized how much teaching potential this has, but yes, I'm going to be doing this for the Gettysburg Address, the Declaration, Inaugural speeches, etc. etc....

 

If I really wanted to be a naughty blogger, I'd do it for, say, the last year's worth of posts written by You....  and then by Phil... and Rob and The Good Doctor.....

 

And thanks, Nate, glad to introduce something new to TCR.

fixed it, images should be no bigger than 600 to 650 pixels in width, there's a dimension attribute when you add an image. Think Al wrote a post about commenting guidelines recently, hence the odd word cloud. Not sure it's the norm for that site....

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Thank you!  ~wincing at my embarassed neediness~

 

I should have added that disclaimer about ALL the word clouds:  they reflect only recent RSS feeds:  they're a snapshot in time, nothing permanent.  Al had a very large post on commenting guidelines, yes.

[ ]

In reply to by Andrew

I really don't have a dog in that "rivalry" - it was the first time I checked out BCB in over a year, but that's just due to lack of time and ambition on my part.

  I would have done word clouds for TLFC and League of Her Own as I check those out more frequently (but sadly, not often enough), but that would have then opened me up to a lot more of "hey, why not MY site?"   So I just left it at the highest-volume Cubs blog out there, and called it good. 

 I am now ready for my exile, and hate-mail from all offended Cubs bloggers. :)

I love that "Chad" appears in our RSS feed word cloud. And Mr. Fox is probably only a small part of this.

Is there one that highlights, "Fuck the Economy, I'm going to Spring Training"?

http://twitter.com/cst_cubs Corey Koskie signs a minor league contract with the Cubs. I guess he'll compete with Luis Rivas for that backup 3B/2B job that may or may not exist on the 25-man roster. Koskie would be a more interesting backup in case A-Ram goes down, at least.

But Trans, those word clouds are just a graphic way of presenting word counts which have been available forever. For example, and I apologize for the exceedingly long post, here is the word and special character count for the entire TCR home page. You'll note that "CUBS" obviously and "RHP" currently are very important at TCR Word Frequency % - 40 1.79 — 2 0.09 ! 5 0.22 " 4 0.18 $1 3 0.13 $11 1 0.04 $12M 2 0.09 $133 1 0.04 $137M 1 0.04 $13M 1 0.04 $15 1 0.04 $162M 1 0.04 $16M 1 0.04 $17 1 0.04 $2 1 0.04 $2M 1 0.04 $3 2 0.09 $300K 1 0.04 $3M 1 0.04 $4 1 0.04 $400K 1 0.04 $725K 1 0.04 $7M 2 0.09 $800K 1 0.04 $875K 1 0.04 ( 11 0.49 ) 11 0.49 , 142 6.37 . 103 4.62 : 20 0.90 ? 2 0.09 ›last 1 0.04 > 15 0.67 » 11 0.49 ©2008 1 0.04 … 1 0.04 0 2 0.09 000 1 0.04 02 10 0.45 05am 1 0.04 07pm 1 0.04 09 1 0.04 1 3 0.13 10 6 0.27 100 2 0.09 10-4 1 0.04 10th 1 0.04 11 4 0.18 12 2 0.09 123456789…next 1 0.04 13 1 0.04 14 2 0.09 141 1 0.04 15 2 0.09 16 2 0.09 16pm 1 0.04 17 3 0.13 18 1 0.04 19 2 0.09 1B 5 0.22 1B-OF 2 0.09 1B-OF-C 1 0.04 1M 1 0.04 1st 1 0.04 2 5 0.22 20 4 0.18 2008 1 0.04 2009 17 0.76 21 1 0.04 22 2 0.09 23 1 0.04 24 1 0.04 25 5 0.22 26 3 0.13 27 4 0.18 279 1 0.04 27am 1 0.04 28 2 0.09 290 1 0.04 2B 5 0.22 2M 2 0.09 3 4 0.18 300 1 0.04 30pm 1 0.04 37 1 0.04 39 1 0.04 3B 5 0.22 3M 1 0.04 4 5 0.22 40-MAN 1 0.04 42 1 0.04 47pm 1 0.04 5 4 0.18 50 1 0.04 500 1 0.04 50am 1 0.04 5-3 1 0.04 535M 1 0.04 55am 1 0.04 55pm 1 0.04 59pm 1 0.04 5M 3 0.13 5th 1 0.04 6 2 0.09 61 1 0.04 625 1 0.04 65M 1 0.04 7 2 0.09 70 1 0.04 711 1 0.04 7-4 1 0.04 75M 1 0.04 8 2 0.09 88 1 0.04 89 1 0.04 9 3 0.13 a 29 1.30 Aaron 3 0.13 about 4 0.18 Abreu 1 0.04 acceptance 1 0.04 account 1 0.04 Act 1 0.04 action 1 0.04 actually 1 0.04 afternoon 1 0.04 agents 1 0.04 ahead 3 0.13 Alex 1 0.04 Alfonso 1 0.04 all 2 0.09 also 1 0.04 an 3 0.13 Analysis 1 0.04 and 33 1.48 Andre 1 0.04 Andres 1 0.04 Andrew 1 0.04 Angel 2 0.09 Angeles 1 0.04 anniversary 1 0.04 another 3 0.13 any 1 0.04 appear 1 0.04 applicable 1 0.04 Approved 2 0.09 Aramis 2 0.09 Archives 1 0.04 are 6 0.27 aren't 1 0.04 Arizona 6 0.27 around 1 0.04 Articles 7 0.31 as 7 0.31 Ascanio 1 0.04 ask 1 0.04 associated 1 0.04 at 13 0.58 Atkins 2 0.09 Attribution-No 1 0.04 Ausmus 1 0.04 authentic 1 0.04 author 1 0.04 authors 1 0.04 AUTO-RENEWAL 1 0.04 award 2 0.09 away 1 0.04 AZ 3 0.13 back 4 0.18 Bako 2 0.09 Ballclub 1 0.04 bar 1 0.04 Barney 2 0.09 base 2 0.09 Baseball 1 0.04 baseball-related 1 0.04 basis 1 0.04 be 6 0.27 been 1 0.04 before 2 0.09 begins 1 0.04 behind 1 0.04 believe 1 0.04 Berg 1 0.04 Bit 1 0.04 Blake 1 0.04 Blanco 2 0.09 Blast 1 0.04 bloggers 1 0.04 Bobby 1 0.04 both 1 0.04 bottom 1 0.04 box 3 0.13 BR 1 0.04 Brad 1 0.04 Bradley 2 0.09 Braves 1 0.04 Brewers 3 0.13 Brian 1 0.04 but 2 0.09 buy-out 1 0.04 Buzz 1 0.04 by 12 0.54 C 9 0.40 C-1B 1 0.04 Cactus 3 0.13 CALENDAR 1 0.04 called 1 0.04 Camp 4 0.18 Campusano 1 0.04 can 3 0.13 cannot 1 0.04 Can't 1 0.04 Cardinals 2 0.09 career 1 0.04 cares 1 0.04 Caridad 1 0.04 Carlos 2 0.09 case 1 0.04 Cashner 2 0.09 Castillo 1 0.04 catch 1 0.04 center 1 0.04 Central 3 0.13 CF 4 0.18 Chad 3 0.13 Chart 2 0.09 CHAT 1 0.04 check 1 0.04 Chicago 2 0.09 CHONE 2 0.09 Claudio 1 0.04 Clevenger 1 0.04 clip 1 0.04 Cloud 2 0.09 clouds 5 0.22 clubs 1 0.04 coach 1 0.04 com 4 0.18 come 2 0.09 comment 1 0.04 comments 18 0.81 Commons 2 0.09 compare 1 0.04 Conditions 1 0.04 Contact 1 0.04 Convention 2 0.09 Copyright 1 0.04 CORNER 1 0.04 Cotts 1 0.04 couple 1 0.04 Creative 2 0.09 crowd 1 0.04 crushed 1 0.04 Cub 3 0.13 Cub-hater2 1 0.04 Cubnut's 1 0.04 Cubs 39 1.75 current 1 0.04 daily 1 0.04 Darwin 2 0.09 date 1 0.04 David 1 0.04 Dawson 7 0.31 DC 1 0.04 Deeds 2 0.09 defeated 2 0.09 deficit 1 0.04 Democratic 1 0.04 Dempster 1 0.04 Depth 2 0.09 Derivative 1 0.04 Derrek 1 0.04 Detailed 1 0.04 device 1 0.04 DeWitt 1 0.04 DH 3 0.13 did 1 0.04 die-hard 1 0.04 different 1 0.04 Disclaimer 1 0.04 Division 1 0.04 do 3 0.13 Dodgers 6 0.27 does 4 0.18 doesn't 1 0.04 donated 1 0.04 Doug 2 0.09 Dr 1 0.04 drive 1 0.04 driven 1 0.04 drove 1 0.04 Drupal 1 0.04 DSL 1 0.04 Dubois 2 0.09 during 1 0.04 Dwight 2 0.09 each 1 0.04 Edward 1 0.04 Eisenberg 1 0.04 elected 1 0.04 Enjoy 1 0.04 entry 5 0.22 Escape 1 0.04 Esmailin 1 0.04 especially 1 0.04 Ethier 1 0.04 even 1 0.04 excitement 1 0.04 EX-CUB 1 0.04 expressed 1 0.04 FACEBOOK 1 0.04 FACTOR 1 0.04 Fame 6 0.27 fan 2 0.09 Fangraphs 1 0.04 FAQ 1 0.04 favorite 1 0.04 Featured 1 0.04 February 1 0.04 FEED 1 0.04 Feel 1 0.04 Feldman 1 0.04 few 1 0.04 field 5 0.22 FIGGINS 1 0.04 finishes 1 0.04 First 1 0.04 five 2 0.09 Follow 1 0.04 follows 1 0.04 Fontenot 5 0.22 for 14 0.63 found 2 0.09 four 3 0.13 fourth 1 0.04 Fox 6 0.27 franchise 1 0.04 free 1 0.04 frequently 1 0.04 Fri 4 0.18 Friday 2 0.09 from 5 0.22 Fukudome 1 0.04 Fuld 3 0.13 fun 1 0.04 Furthermore 1 0.04 G 5 0.22 Gallardo 1 0.04 game 3 0.13 Gameday 6 0.27 Games 1 0.04 Gathright 4 0.18 Gaudin 1 0.04 gear 1 0.04 Geovany 2 0.09 Get 1 0.04 Getting 1 0.04 givers 1 0.04 giving 1 0.04 Gloves 1 0.04 go 2 0.09 God 1 0.04 Gold 1 0.04 gone 1 0.04 Good 1 0.04 got 1 0.04 grand 1 0.04 Gregg 1 0.04 G's 1 0.04 Guzman 1 0.04 had 8 0.36 Hall 6 0.27 Harden 1 0.04 Hart 1 0.04 has 2 0.09 hats 1 0.04 have 4 0.18 he 9 0.40 Head 2 0.09 heading 1 0.04 Hecht's 1 0.04 Heilman 1 0.04 Henry 1 0.04 her 1 0.04 here 2 0.09 he's 1 0.04 Hill 1 0.04 him 2 0.09 his 4 0.18 historian 1 0.04 hit 3 0.13 hits 2 0.09 Hoffpauir 8 0.36 Hoff-POWER 2 0.09 HoHoKam 4 0.18 home 2 0.09 homer 3 0.13 homers 1 0.04 Honors 1 0.04 Hosting 1 0.04 HotDrupal 1 0.04 how 2 0.09 husband 1 0.04 I 9 0.40 I'd 1 0.04 idea 1 0.04 if 8 0.36 IF-OF 1 0.04 in 21 0.94 Inc 1 0.04 includes 1 0.04 independent 1 0.04 individual 1 0.04 INF 2 0.09 infer 1 0.04 Info 2 0.09 information 1 0.04 INJURY 1 0.04 in-season 1 0.04 instead 3 0.13 insufferable 3 0.13 into 3 0.13 INVITEES 1 0.04 irrefutable 1 0.04 is 10 0.45 it 4 0.18 its 3 0.13 J 1 0.04 Jake 5 0.22 Jason 4 0.18 Jeff 3 0.13 Joe 1 0.04 Joey 4 0.18 Johnson 4 0.18 Jose 1 0.04 Jumbo 1 0.04 just 2 0.09 Justin 1 0.04 Kadokura 2 0.09 Kemp 1 0.04 Ken 1 0.04 Kevin 2 0.09 knees 2 0.09 know 1 0.04 Kosuke 1 0.04 Koyie 1 0.04 lack 1 0.04 Latest 3 0.13 lead 1 0.04 LEADERS 1 0.04 League 10 0.45 Leagues 1 0.04 led 1 0.04 Lee 2 0.09 left 1 0.04 Let's 1 0.04 LF 4 0.18 LHP 8 0.36 License 2 0.09 licensed 1 0.04 like 3 0.13 Lilly 2 0.09 Lineup 2 0.09 Lineups 1 0.04 Link 1 0.04 Links 2 0.09 list 2 0.09 listed 1 0.04 Lists 1 0.04 locks 1 0.04 Log 1 0.04 Loney 1 0.04 look 2 0.09 Los 1 0.04 Louis 1 0.04 love 1 0.04 Luis 3 0.13 Luxury 1 0.04 made 1 0.04 managed 1 0.04 Map 1 0.04 Marcos 1 0.04 Mark 1 0.04 Marmol 1 0.04 Marquis 1 0.04 Marshall 4 0.18 Mateo 1 0.04 Mathes 1 0.04 Matt 1 0.04 McCain's 1 0.04 me 2 0.09 member 1 0.04 Mesa 2 0.09 Mets 1 0.04 Micah 7 0.31 Mike 5 0.22 Miles 2 0.09 Milton 2 0.09 Milwaukee 1 0.04 mimimum 1 0.04 Minor 6 0.27 Mitch 2 0.09 MLB 3 0.13 Mobile 3 0.13 MoFuse 1 0.04 Mon 1 0.04 more 1 0.04 Mr 1 0.04 much 1 0.04 Music 1 0.04 Muskat 2 0.09 my 2 0.09 National 3 0.13 navel-gaze 1 0.04 navigator 1 0.04 Neal 1 0.04 nearly 1 0.04 new 9 0.40 newest 1 0.04 nice 1 0.04 NL 4 0.18 no 3 0.13 nomination 1 0.04 not 7 0.31 NOTE 1 0.04 Notes 2 0.09 Numbers 2 0.09 Obama's 1 0.04 of 40 1.79 OF-1B 1 0.04 off 1 0.04 Oh 1 0.04 Old 1 0.04 on 20 0.90 ONLY 1 0.04 open 7 0.31 opener 1 0.04 or 1 0.04 other 1 0.04 our 5 0.22 ourselves 1 0.04 out 6 0.27 over 1 0.04 P 1 0.04 paid 1 0.04 Park 4 0.18 Patterson 2 0.09 Patton 1 0.04 Paul 2 0.09 Payroll 1 0.04 Perhaps 1 0.04 Perkins 1 0.04 Phil 4 0.18 Phillies 1 0.04 Phil's 3 0.13 picture 1 0.04 Pierre 1 0.04 plate 1 0.04 Player 1 0.04 players 3 0.13 pledge 1 0.04 Posnanski 1 0.04 posts 2 0.09 power 1 0.04 Powered 1 0.04 Powers 1 0.04 pretty 1 0.04 probably 1 0.04 projected 4 0.18 projections 3 0.13 projections1 1 0.04 pronounced 1 0.04 prospects 1 0.04 Prospectus 1 0.04 putting 1 0.04 Question 1 0.04 quick 2 0.09 quite 1 0.04 R 1 0.04 race 1 0.04 Ramirez 2 0.09 Randy 1 0.04 Rangers 4 0.18 rankings 1 0.04 RBI 1 0.04 RBIs 1 0.04 reached 1 0.04 read 6 0.27 reason 1 0.04 Recent 2 0.09 Reds 1 0.04 Reed 2 0.09 Reporter 1 0.04 represents 1 0.04 Republican 1 0.04 Reserve 2 0.09 reserved 1 0.04 rest 6 0.27 results 2 0.09 reveal 1 0.04 RF 4 0.18 RHP 25 1.12 Rich 1 0.04 Richie 1 0.04 right 2 0.09 right-centerfield 1 0.04 rights 2 0.09 ring 1 0.04 Rivas 2 0.09 Rob 6 0.27 Robnett 2 0.09 Rocky 1 0.04 rooftops 1 0.04 Roquet 1 0.04 Roster 1 0.04 rosters 2 0.09 RSS 2 0.09 run 3 0.13 runner 1 0.04 running 2 0.09 runs 4 0.18 Ruz's 1 0.04 Ryan 3 0.13 S 1 0.04 salary 2 0.09 Sam 3 0.13 Samardzija 2 0.09 Sarcasm 1 0.04 Sat 2 0.09 say 1 0.04 Scales 2 0.09 schedule 2 0.09 Schlitter 1 0.04 score 4 0.18 scored 2 0.09 Scott 1 0.04 Sean 5 0.22 Search 1 0.04 season 1 0.04 Second 1 0.04 set 1 0.04 seven 2 0.09 Shawn 1 0.04 show 1 0.04 sidebar 1 0.04 SIGNED 1 0.04 signing 1 0.04 Simulated 1 0.04 site 4 0.18 six 1 0.04 slam 1 0.04 slammed 1 0.04 smacked 1 0.04 smallish 1 0.04 Smith 2 0.09 Snyder 1 0.04 so 3 0.13 solely 1 0.04 solo 1 0.04 some 4 0.18 Soriano 2 0.09 Soto 3 0.13 speech 1 0.04 Spot 1 0.04 Spring 8 0.36 squads 1 0.04 SS 7 0.31 St 2 0.09 Stadium 1 0.04 Stanton 1 0.04 start 4 0.18 Starting 1 0.04 statements 1 0.04 States 1 0.04 stay 1 0.04 Steve 1 0.04 Stevens 1 0.04 stolen 1 0.04 strength 1 0.04 strolling 1 0.04 students 1 0.04 stuff 1 0.04 Submitted 10 0.45 SUBSCRIPTION 1 0.04 subsidiaries 1 0.04 SUB-TOTAL 2 0.09 Sullivan 1 0.04 Sun 1 0.04 sunny 2 0.09 Support 1 0.04 Surprise 1 0.04 suspect 1 0.04 switch 1 0.04 Taguchi 2 0.09 takes 2 0.09 talking 1 0.04 Tax 1 0.04 TCR 10 0.45 team 2 0.09 teams 1 0.04 Ted 2 0.09 Terms 1 0.04 Texas 1 0.04 text 1 0.04 Textual 1 0.04 than 1 0.04 thank 3 0.13 thanks 3 0.13 that 6 0.27 that's 2 0.09 the 74 3.32 thecubreporter 2 0.09 their 2 0.09 them 1 0.04 Theriot 3 0.13 They 1 0.04 they've 1 0.04 things 2 0.09 think 4 0.18 thinks 1 0.04 this 12 0.54 those 2 0.09 thrashed 1 0.04 Thread 6 0.27 three 2 0.09 three-run 3 0.13 threshold 1 0.04 threw 1 0.04 Thu 3 0.13 Tigers 1 0.04 tight 1 0.04 times 3 0.13 to 19 0.85 today 1 0.04 Tom 1 0.04 Tony 1 0.04 top 3 0.13 TOTAL 1 0.04 tour 1 0.04 toward 1 0.04 Trade 1 0.04 traded 1 0.04 Training 8 0.36 Transmission 2 0.09 Transmission's 1 0.04 triple 1 0.04 trot 1 0.04 true 1 0.04 Tue 1 0.04 turning 1 0.04 Twitter 2 0.09 two 4 0.18 two-run 4 0.18 under 1 0.04 Uniform 2 0.09 United 1 0.04 until 1 0.04 up 1 0.04 Upcoming 1 0.04 Updated 1 0.04 us 2 0.09 USA 1 0.04 use 2 0.09 useful 1 0.04 utility 1 0.04 Vargas 1 0.04 very 1 0.04 Victory 1 0.04 viewpoints 1 0.04 Vince 1 0.04 visual 1 0.04 Vizcaino 1 0.04 vs 1 0.04 Waddell 1 0.04 walk 1 0.04 walks 1 0.04 warm 1 0.04 way 1 0.04 we 2 0.09 weather 2 0.09 Web 2 0.09 website 1 0.04 websites 1 0.04 Wed 5 0.22 weekend 1 0.04 weeks 2 0.09 Welington 1 0.04 well 2 0.09 Wells 1 0.04 what 2 0.09 which 1 0.04 while 1 0.04 Whipple 1 0.04 who 3 0.13 Wife 1 0.04 WIKLIFIELD 1 0.04 will 5 0.22 win 2 0.09 WINNERS 1 0.04 wins 1 0.04 with 8 0.36 won 2 0.09 word 6 0.27 words 1 0.04 work 1 0.04 Works 1 0.04 would 5 0.22 Wrath 1 0.04 wrigley 1 0.04 write 1 0.04 writers 3 0.13 writes 1 0.04 yeah 1 0.04 years 1 0.04 you 5 0.22 Young 1 0.04 Your 1 0.04 Yovanni 1 0.04 Zambrano 1 0.04 Different words/items counted: 820 Total Words: 1697 Total Punctuation: 272 Total Other Text: 219 Total Characters: 10330 Total Paragraphs: 308

if only there was a visual way to represent that info that would take up less space... ------ use a smaller font?

Nats Bowden resigns under a cloud of suspicion: $$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$ $$$$$$$$$ Jim B. $$$$$ $$$$$$$

Recent comments

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.  

  • Childersb3 (view)

    AZ Phil:
    Rookie ball (ACL) starts on May 4th. Do yo think Ramon and Rosario (maybe Delgado) stay in Mesa for the month of May, then go to MB if all goes "solid"?
     

  • crunch (view)

    masterboney is a luxury on a team that has multiple, capable options for 2nd, SS, and 3rd without him around.  i don't hate the guy, but if madrigal is sticking around then masterboney is expendable.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    I THINK I agree with that decision. They committed to Wicks as a starter and, while he hasn’t been stellar I don’t think he’s been bad enough to undo that commitment.

    That said, Wesneski’s performance last night dictates he be the next righty up.

    Quite the dilemma. They have many good options, particularly in relief, but not many great ones. And complicating the situation is that the pitchers being paid the most are by and large performing the worst - or in Taillon’s case, at least to this point, not at all.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Wesneski and Mastrobuoni to Iowa

    Taillon and Wisdom up

    Wesneski can't pitch for a couple of days after the 4 IP from last night. But Jed picked Wicks over Wesneski.