Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, ten players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, two players are on the 15-DAY IL, and two players are on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-17-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Keegan Thompson
Hayden Wesneski 
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
* Miles Mastrobuoni
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 10 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 

10-DAY IL: 2 
Seiya Suzuki, OF
Patrick Wisdom, INF 

15-DAY IL: 2
* Justin Steele, P  
Jameson Taillon, P 

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Head in a Word Cloud.

Perhaps you have run into "word clouds," a visual device that represents how frequently different words appear in a text.  As a historian I love it, as I can do fun things like compare Obama's 2008 Democratic National Convention nomination acceptance speech with McCain's from the Republican National Convention.

That's useful stuff.  I can show word clouds like those to my students, and ask them what the clouds do (and do not) reveal.

But who cares about utility.  Let's use some word clouds to navel-gaze, and check out our favorite baseball-related websites.

 

Using the free java application at www.wordle.net I entered the link for The Cub Reporter's RSS feed, and got this:

What does this tell us about ourselves?  Eh, on the one hand, perhaps not much more than a bit of fun navel gazing.  It does look like it's spring training, though.  The most prominent names I see are Micah Hoffpauir, Darwin Barney, Joey Gathright and Marshall.  And it looks like we're a permissive group, we like the word "allowing."  I have no idea why.

 

However, comparing our cloud with that from Carrie Muskat's feed shows some interesting differences

"Cubs" is even more prominent for Muskat than it is for us.  Perhaps not surprising, as selling the team is part of her job description.  But look at that Giant Blue Sutcliffe!  Muskat's readership likely is A. more interested in name-brand Cubs (and ex-Cubs) and B. more interested in human interest stories.  Those differences show up elsewhere in the word cloud:  check out how much more prominent Milton Bradley and his quadriceps are.  LouPa features prominently, as do other marque names like Aramis and Harden.  Forgive me for noticing, and remarking on, the prominence of "Carrie."

If you're really in to self-mutilation, there's Phil Rogers' RSS feed.

 

It doesn't look like Rogers actually talks much about baseball.  Appropriate.

I should credit Rogers, though, as there isn't a larger Tribune Cubs News feed.  Paul Sullivan also doesn't seem to have any sort of news feed.  So instead, I cut and pasted the text of four of his "mailbag" columns into wordle, and got this.  (Wordle will randomly pair different fonts and color schemes and word layout, if you don't specify any.  This layout struck me as quite pretty, so I left it as is.)

I dare you to guess, from this word cloud, what the title is of Paul Sullivan's column.

Both the Sun-Times and the Daily Herald offer Cubs RSS feeds. Here's the Sun-Times' feed.

 

 

Compare that to the Daily Herald's feed.

 

The Sun Times appears to care far more about Milton Bradley.  The Herald, the Cubs.

 

How does TCR compare to Bleed Cubbie Blue?  Here's their word cloud.

 

 

I'm not interested in any BCB/TCR rivalry:  It's a big enough fan-base to support both of us.  But there are interesting differences.  BCB's word cloud includes a lot more, well, internet-y words like "post" and "comment" and "link". TCR's wordle word cloud more closely resembles "traditional" news media with a higher preponderance of player names and baseball-event sort of words. 

Like many of you, I read Fan Graphs religiously. Here's the word cloud on their feed.

 

Look much like a sabrmetric site?

 

 

Comments

Yes, I know that my clouds broke the normal margins and formatting and all that stuff.

 

No, I don't know how to fix it.  Rob will spank me, later; it's part of the little games we play.

 

 

Interesting post Trans. I've never seen a word cloud before. Cool stuff.

Trans, you glorious word cloud-gazing bastard...

Love it. I, too, played the Obama/McCain game during the campaign, though I used op-ed pieces they wrote on consecutive days for the Wall Street Journal, right before the election. It was illuminating, as are all of these. (The historian in you might also enjoy running the Gettyburg Address or the Declaration of Independence through this sort of analysis.)

What I take from the Phil Rogers cloud--he can't believe he is lucky enough to have a job that takes him to Arizona.

[ ]

In reply to by Cubnut

Ha, yeah, I also gathered that about Mr. Rogers.

 

I haven't started collecting them yet, as I just in the last week realized how much teaching potential this has, but yes, I'm going to be doing this for the Gettysburg Address, the Declaration, Inaugural speeches, etc. etc....

 

If I really wanted to be a naughty blogger, I'd do it for, say, the last year's worth of posts written by You....  and then by Phil... and Rob and The Good Doctor.....

 

And thanks, Nate, glad to introduce something new to TCR.

fixed it, images should be no bigger than 600 to 650 pixels in width, there's a dimension attribute when you add an image. Think Al wrote a post about commenting guidelines recently, hence the odd word cloud. Not sure it's the norm for that site....

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

Thank you!  ~wincing at my embarassed neediness~

 

I should have added that disclaimer about ALL the word clouds:  they reflect only recent RSS feeds:  they're a snapshot in time, nothing permanent.  Al had a very large post on commenting guidelines, yes.

[ ]

In reply to by Andrew

I really don't have a dog in that "rivalry" - it was the first time I checked out BCB in over a year, but that's just due to lack of time and ambition on my part.

  I would have done word clouds for TLFC and League of Her Own as I check those out more frequently (but sadly, not often enough), but that would have then opened me up to a lot more of "hey, why not MY site?"   So I just left it at the highest-volume Cubs blog out there, and called it good. 

 I am now ready for my exile, and hate-mail from all offended Cubs bloggers. :)

I love that "Chad" appears in our RSS feed word cloud. And Mr. Fox is probably only a small part of this.

Is there one that highlights, "Fuck the Economy, I'm going to Spring Training"?

http://twitter.com/cst_cubs Corey Koskie signs a minor league contract with the Cubs. I guess he'll compete with Luis Rivas for that backup 3B/2B job that may or may not exist on the 25-man roster. Koskie would be a more interesting backup in case A-Ram goes down, at least.

But Trans, those word clouds are just a graphic way of presenting word counts which have been available forever. For example, and I apologize for the exceedingly long post, here is the word and special character count for the entire TCR home page. You'll note that "CUBS" obviously and "RHP" currently are very important at TCR Word Frequency % - 40 1.79 — 2 0.09 ! 5 0.22 " 4 0.18 $1 3 0.13 $11 1 0.04 $12M 2 0.09 $133 1 0.04 $137M 1 0.04 $13M 1 0.04 $15 1 0.04 $162M 1 0.04 $16M 1 0.04 $17 1 0.04 $2 1 0.04 $2M 1 0.04 $3 2 0.09 $300K 1 0.04 $3M 1 0.04 $4 1 0.04 $400K 1 0.04 $725K 1 0.04 $7M 2 0.09 $800K 1 0.04 $875K 1 0.04 ( 11 0.49 ) 11 0.49 , 142 6.37 . 103 4.62 : 20 0.90 ? 2 0.09 ›last 1 0.04 > 15 0.67 » 11 0.49 ©2008 1 0.04 … 1 0.04 0 2 0.09 000 1 0.04 02 10 0.45 05am 1 0.04 07pm 1 0.04 09 1 0.04 1 3 0.13 10 6 0.27 100 2 0.09 10-4 1 0.04 10th 1 0.04 11 4 0.18 12 2 0.09 123456789…next 1 0.04 13 1 0.04 14 2 0.09 141 1 0.04 15 2 0.09 16 2 0.09 16pm 1 0.04 17 3 0.13 18 1 0.04 19 2 0.09 1B 5 0.22 1B-OF 2 0.09 1B-OF-C 1 0.04 1M 1 0.04 1st 1 0.04 2 5 0.22 20 4 0.18 2008 1 0.04 2009 17 0.76 21 1 0.04 22 2 0.09 23 1 0.04 24 1 0.04 25 5 0.22 26 3 0.13 27 4 0.18 279 1 0.04 27am 1 0.04 28 2 0.09 290 1 0.04 2B 5 0.22 2M 2 0.09 3 4 0.18 300 1 0.04 30pm 1 0.04 37 1 0.04 39 1 0.04 3B 5 0.22 3M 1 0.04 4 5 0.22 40-MAN 1 0.04 42 1 0.04 47pm 1 0.04 5 4 0.18 50 1 0.04 500 1 0.04 50am 1 0.04 5-3 1 0.04 535M 1 0.04 55am 1 0.04 55pm 1 0.04 59pm 1 0.04 5M 3 0.13 5th 1 0.04 6 2 0.09 61 1 0.04 625 1 0.04 65M 1 0.04 7 2 0.09 70 1 0.04 711 1 0.04 7-4 1 0.04 75M 1 0.04 8 2 0.09 88 1 0.04 89 1 0.04 9 3 0.13 a 29 1.30 Aaron 3 0.13 about 4 0.18 Abreu 1 0.04 acceptance 1 0.04 account 1 0.04 Act 1 0.04 action 1 0.04 actually 1 0.04 afternoon 1 0.04 agents 1 0.04 ahead 3 0.13 Alex 1 0.04 Alfonso 1 0.04 all 2 0.09 also 1 0.04 an 3 0.13 Analysis 1 0.04 and 33 1.48 Andre 1 0.04 Andres 1 0.04 Andrew 1 0.04 Angel 2 0.09 Angeles 1 0.04 anniversary 1 0.04 another 3 0.13 any 1 0.04 appear 1 0.04 applicable 1 0.04 Approved 2 0.09 Aramis 2 0.09 Archives 1 0.04 are 6 0.27 aren't 1 0.04 Arizona 6 0.27 around 1 0.04 Articles 7 0.31 as 7 0.31 Ascanio 1 0.04 ask 1 0.04 associated 1 0.04 at 13 0.58 Atkins 2 0.09 Attribution-No 1 0.04 Ausmus 1 0.04 authentic 1 0.04 author 1 0.04 authors 1 0.04 AUTO-RENEWAL 1 0.04 award 2 0.09 away 1 0.04 AZ 3 0.13 back 4 0.18 Bako 2 0.09 Ballclub 1 0.04 bar 1 0.04 Barney 2 0.09 base 2 0.09 Baseball 1 0.04 baseball-related 1 0.04 basis 1 0.04 be 6 0.27 been 1 0.04 before 2 0.09 begins 1 0.04 behind 1 0.04 believe 1 0.04 Berg 1 0.04 Bit 1 0.04 Blake 1 0.04 Blanco 2 0.09 Blast 1 0.04 bloggers 1 0.04 Bobby 1 0.04 both 1 0.04 bottom 1 0.04 box 3 0.13 BR 1 0.04 Brad 1 0.04 Bradley 2 0.09 Braves 1 0.04 Brewers 3 0.13 Brian 1 0.04 but 2 0.09 buy-out 1 0.04 Buzz 1 0.04 by 12 0.54 C 9 0.40 C-1B 1 0.04 Cactus 3 0.13 CALENDAR 1 0.04 called 1 0.04 Camp 4 0.18 Campusano 1 0.04 can 3 0.13 cannot 1 0.04 Can't 1 0.04 Cardinals 2 0.09 career 1 0.04 cares 1 0.04 Caridad 1 0.04 Carlos 2 0.09 case 1 0.04 Cashner 2 0.09 Castillo 1 0.04 catch 1 0.04 center 1 0.04 Central 3 0.13 CF 4 0.18 Chad 3 0.13 Chart 2 0.09 CHAT 1 0.04 check 1 0.04 Chicago 2 0.09 CHONE 2 0.09 Claudio 1 0.04 Clevenger 1 0.04 clip 1 0.04 Cloud 2 0.09 clouds 5 0.22 clubs 1 0.04 coach 1 0.04 com 4 0.18 come 2 0.09 comment 1 0.04 comments 18 0.81 Commons 2 0.09 compare 1 0.04 Conditions 1 0.04 Contact 1 0.04 Convention 2 0.09 Copyright 1 0.04 CORNER 1 0.04 Cotts 1 0.04 couple 1 0.04 Creative 2 0.09 crowd 1 0.04 crushed 1 0.04 Cub 3 0.13 Cub-hater2 1 0.04 Cubnut's 1 0.04 Cubs 39 1.75 current 1 0.04 daily 1 0.04 Darwin 2 0.09 date 1 0.04 David 1 0.04 Dawson 7 0.31 DC 1 0.04 Deeds 2 0.09 defeated 2 0.09 deficit 1 0.04 Democratic 1 0.04 Dempster 1 0.04 Depth 2 0.09 Derivative 1 0.04 Derrek 1 0.04 Detailed 1 0.04 device 1 0.04 DeWitt 1 0.04 DH 3 0.13 did 1 0.04 die-hard 1 0.04 different 1 0.04 Disclaimer 1 0.04 Division 1 0.04 do 3 0.13 Dodgers 6 0.27 does 4 0.18 doesn't 1 0.04 donated 1 0.04 Doug 2 0.09 Dr 1 0.04 drive 1 0.04 driven 1 0.04 drove 1 0.04 Drupal 1 0.04 DSL 1 0.04 Dubois 2 0.09 during 1 0.04 Dwight 2 0.09 each 1 0.04 Edward 1 0.04 Eisenberg 1 0.04 elected 1 0.04 Enjoy 1 0.04 entry 5 0.22 Escape 1 0.04 Esmailin 1 0.04 especially 1 0.04 Ethier 1 0.04 even 1 0.04 excitement 1 0.04 EX-CUB 1 0.04 expressed 1 0.04 FACEBOOK 1 0.04 FACTOR 1 0.04 Fame 6 0.27 fan 2 0.09 Fangraphs 1 0.04 FAQ 1 0.04 favorite 1 0.04 Featured 1 0.04 February 1 0.04 FEED 1 0.04 Feel 1 0.04 Feldman 1 0.04 few 1 0.04 field 5 0.22 FIGGINS 1 0.04 finishes 1 0.04 First 1 0.04 five 2 0.09 Follow 1 0.04 follows 1 0.04 Fontenot 5 0.22 for 14 0.63 found 2 0.09 four 3 0.13 fourth 1 0.04 Fox 6 0.27 franchise 1 0.04 free 1 0.04 frequently 1 0.04 Fri 4 0.18 Friday 2 0.09 from 5 0.22 Fukudome 1 0.04 Fuld 3 0.13 fun 1 0.04 Furthermore 1 0.04 G 5 0.22 Gallardo 1 0.04 game 3 0.13 Gameday 6 0.27 Games 1 0.04 Gathright 4 0.18 Gaudin 1 0.04 gear 1 0.04 Geovany 2 0.09 Get 1 0.04 Getting 1 0.04 givers 1 0.04 giving 1 0.04 Gloves 1 0.04 go 2 0.09 God 1 0.04 Gold 1 0.04 gone 1 0.04 Good 1 0.04 got 1 0.04 grand 1 0.04 Gregg 1 0.04 G's 1 0.04 Guzman 1 0.04 had 8 0.36 Hall 6 0.27 Harden 1 0.04 Hart 1 0.04 has 2 0.09 hats 1 0.04 have 4 0.18 he 9 0.40 Head 2 0.09 heading 1 0.04 Hecht's 1 0.04 Heilman 1 0.04 Henry 1 0.04 her 1 0.04 here 2 0.09 he's 1 0.04 Hill 1 0.04 him 2 0.09 his 4 0.18 historian 1 0.04 hit 3 0.13 hits 2 0.09 Hoffpauir 8 0.36 Hoff-POWER 2 0.09 HoHoKam 4 0.18 home 2 0.09 homer 3 0.13 homers 1 0.04 Honors 1 0.04 Hosting 1 0.04 HotDrupal 1 0.04 how 2 0.09 husband 1 0.04 I 9 0.40 I'd 1 0.04 idea 1 0.04 if 8 0.36 IF-OF 1 0.04 in 21 0.94 Inc 1 0.04 includes 1 0.04 independent 1 0.04 individual 1 0.04 INF 2 0.09 infer 1 0.04 Info 2 0.09 information 1 0.04 INJURY 1 0.04 in-season 1 0.04 instead 3 0.13 insufferable 3 0.13 into 3 0.13 INVITEES 1 0.04 irrefutable 1 0.04 is 10 0.45 it 4 0.18 its 3 0.13 J 1 0.04 Jake 5 0.22 Jason 4 0.18 Jeff 3 0.13 Joe 1 0.04 Joey 4 0.18 Johnson 4 0.18 Jose 1 0.04 Jumbo 1 0.04 just 2 0.09 Justin 1 0.04 Kadokura 2 0.09 Kemp 1 0.04 Ken 1 0.04 Kevin 2 0.09 knees 2 0.09 know 1 0.04 Kosuke 1 0.04 Koyie 1 0.04 lack 1 0.04 Latest 3 0.13 lead 1 0.04 LEADERS 1 0.04 League 10 0.45 Leagues 1 0.04 led 1 0.04 Lee 2 0.09 left 1 0.04 Let's 1 0.04 LF 4 0.18 LHP 8 0.36 License 2 0.09 licensed 1 0.04 like 3 0.13 Lilly 2 0.09 Lineup 2 0.09 Lineups 1 0.04 Link 1 0.04 Links 2 0.09 list 2 0.09 listed 1 0.04 Lists 1 0.04 locks 1 0.04 Log 1 0.04 Loney 1 0.04 look 2 0.09 Los 1 0.04 Louis 1 0.04 love 1 0.04 Luis 3 0.13 Luxury 1 0.04 made 1 0.04 managed 1 0.04 Map 1 0.04 Marcos 1 0.04 Mark 1 0.04 Marmol 1 0.04 Marquis 1 0.04 Marshall 4 0.18 Mateo 1 0.04 Mathes 1 0.04 Matt 1 0.04 McCain's 1 0.04 me 2 0.09 member 1 0.04 Mesa 2 0.09 Mets 1 0.04 Micah 7 0.31 Mike 5 0.22 Miles 2 0.09 Milton 2 0.09 Milwaukee 1 0.04 mimimum 1 0.04 Minor 6 0.27 Mitch 2 0.09 MLB 3 0.13 Mobile 3 0.13 MoFuse 1 0.04 Mon 1 0.04 more 1 0.04 Mr 1 0.04 much 1 0.04 Music 1 0.04 Muskat 2 0.09 my 2 0.09 National 3 0.13 navel-gaze 1 0.04 navigator 1 0.04 Neal 1 0.04 nearly 1 0.04 new 9 0.40 newest 1 0.04 nice 1 0.04 NL 4 0.18 no 3 0.13 nomination 1 0.04 not 7 0.31 NOTE 1 0.04 Notes 2 0.09 Numbers 2 0.09 Obama's 1 0.04 of 40 1.79 OF-1B 1 0.04 off 1 0.04 Oh 1 0.04 Old 1 0.04 on 20 0.90 ONLY 1 0.04 open 7 0.31 opener 1 0.04 or 1 0.04 other 1 0.04 our 5 0.22 ourselves 1 0.04 out 6 0.27 over 1 0.04 P 1 0.04 paid 1 0.04 Park 4 0.18 Patterson 2 0.09 Patton 1 0.04 Paul 2 0.09 Payroll 1 0.04 Perhaps 1 0.04 Perkins 1 0.04 Phil 4 0.18 Phillies 1 0.04 Phil's 3 0.13 picture 1 0.04 Pierre 1 0.04 plate 1 0.04 Player 1 0.04 players 3 0.13 pledge 1 0.04 Posnanski 1 0.04 posts 2 0.09 power 1 0.04 Powered 1 0.04 Powers 1 0.04 pretty 1 0.04 probably 1 0.04 projected 4 0.18 projections 3 0.13 projections1 1 0.04 pronounced 1 0.04 prospects 1 0.04 Prospectus 1 0.04 putting 1 0.04 Question 1 0.04 quick 2 0.09 quite 1 0.04 R 1 0.04 race 1 0.04 Ramirez 2 0.09 Randy 1 0.04 Rangers 4 0.18 rankings 1 0.04 RBI 1 0.04 RBIs 1 0.04 reached 1 0.04 read 6 0.27 reason 1 0.04 Recent 2 0.09 Reds 1 0.04 Reed 2 0.09 Reporter 1 0.04 represents 1 0.04 Republican 1 0.04 Reserve 2 0.09 reserved 1 0.04 rest 6 0.27 results 2 0.09 reveal 1 0.04 RF 4 0.18 RHP 25 1.12 Rich 1 0.04 Richie 1 0.04 right 2 0.09 right-centerfield 1 0.04 rights 2 0.09 ring 1 0.04 Rivas 2 0.09 Rob 6 0.27 Robnett 2 0.09 Rocky 1 0.04 rooftops 1 0.04 Roquet 1 0.04 Roster 1 0.04 rosters 2 0.09 RSS 2 0.09 run 3 0.13 runner 1 0.04 running 2 0.09 runs 4 0.18 Ruz's 1 0.04 Ryan 3 0.13 S 1 0.04 salary 2 0.09 Sam 3 0.13 Samardzija 2 0.09 Sarcasm 1 0.04 Sat 2 0.09 say 1 0.04 Scales 2 0.09 schedule 2 0.09 Schlitter 1 0.04 score 4 0.18 scored 2 0.09 Scott 1 0.04 Sean 5 0.22 Search 1 0.04 season 1 0.04 Second 1 0.04 set 1 0.04 seven 2 0.09 Shawn 1 0.04 show 1 0.04 sidebar 1 0.04 SIGNED 1 0.04 signing 1 0.04 Simulated 1 0.04 site 4 0.18 six 1 0.04 slam 1 0.04 slammed 1 0.04 smacked 1 0.04 smallish 1 0.04 Smith 2 0.09 Snyder 1 0.04 so 3 0.13 solely 1 0.04 solo 1 0.04 some 4 0.18 Soriano 2 0.09 Soto 3 0.13 speech 1 0.04 Spot 1 0.04 Spring 8 0.36 squads 1 0.04 SS 7 0.31 St 2 0.09 Stadium 1 0.04 Stanton 1 0.04 start 4 0.18 Starting 1 0.04 statements 1 0.04 States 1 0.04 stay 1 0.04 Steve 1 0.04 Stevens 1 0.04 stolen 1 0.04 strength 1 0.04 strolling 1 0.04 students 1 0.04 stuff 1 0.04 Submitted 10 0.45 SUBSCRIPTION 1 0.04 subsidiaries 1 0.04 SUB-TOTAL 2 0.09 Sullivan 1 0.04 Sun 1 0.04 sunny 2 0.09 Support 1 0.04 Surprise 1 0.04 suspect 1 0.04 switch 1 0.04 Taguchi 2 0.09 takes 2 0.09 talking 1 0.04 Tax 1 0.04 TCR 10 0.45 team 2 0.09 teams 1 0.04 Ted 2 0.09 Terms 1 0.04 Texas 1 0.04 text 1 0.04 Textual 1 0.04 than 1 0.04 thank 3 0.13 thanks 3 0.13 that 6 0.27 that's 2 0.09 the 74 3.32 thecubreporter 2 0.09 their 2 0.09 them 1 0.04 Theriot 3 0.13 They 1 0.04 they've 1 0.04 things 2 0.09 think 4 0.18 thinks 1 0.04 this 12 0.54 those 2 0.09 thrashed 1 0.04 Thread 6 0.27 three 2 0.09 three-run 3 0.13 threshold 1 0.04 threw 1 0.04 Thu 3 0.13 Tigers 1 0.04 tight 1 0.04 times 3 0.13 to 19 0.85 today 1 0.04 Tom 1 0.04 Tony 1 0.04 top 3 0.13 TOTAL 1 0.04 tour 1 0.04 toward 1 0.04 Trade 1 0.04 traded 1 0.04 Training 8 0.36 Transmission 2 0.09 Transmission's 1 0.04 triple 1 0.04 trot 1 0.04 true 1 0.04 Tue 1 0.04 turning 1 0.04 Twitter 2 0.09 two 4 0.18 two-run 4 0.18 under 1 0.04 Uniform 2 0.09 United 1 0.04 until 1 0.04 up 1 0.04 Upcoming 1 0.04 Updated 1 0.04 us 2 0.09 USA 1 0.04 use 2 0.09 useful 1 0.04 utility 1 0.04 Vargas 1 0.04 very 1 0.04 Victory 1 0.04 viewpoints 1 0.04 Vince 1 0.04 visual 1 0.04 Vizcaino 1 0.04 vs 1 0.04 Waddell 1 0.04 walk 1 0.04 walks 1 0.04 warm 1 0.04 way 1 0.04 we 2 0.09 weather 2 0.09 Web 2 0.09 website 1 0.04 websites 1 0.04 Wed 5 0.22 weekend 1 0.04 weeks 2 0.09 Welington 1 0.04 well 2 0.09 Wells 1 0.04 what 2 0.09 which 1 0.04 while 1 0.04 Whipple 1 0.04 who 3 0.13 Wife 1 0.04 WIKLIFIELD 1 0.04 will 5 0.22 win 2 0.09 WINNERS 1 0.04 wins 1 0.04 with 8 0.36 won 2 0.09 word 6 0.27 words 1 0.04 work 1 0.04 Works 1 0.04 would 5 0.22 Wrath 1 0.04 wrigley 1 0.04 write 1 0.04 writers 3 0.13 writes 1 0.04 yeah 1 0.04 years 1 0.04 you 5 0.22 Young 1 0.04 Your 1 0.04 Yovanni 1 0.04 Zambrano 1 0.04 Different words/items counted: 820 Total Words: 1697 Total Punctuation: 272 Total Other Text: 219 Total Characters: 10330 Total Paragraphs: 308

if only there was a visual way to represent that info that would take up less space... ------ use a smaller font?

Nats Bowden resigns under a cloud of suspicion: $$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$ $$$$$$$$$ Jim B. $$$$$ $$$$$$$

Recent comments

  • Childersb3 (view)

    I wanted Almonte gone last week, but that was before Merryweather went down and Little got demoted. Almonte in his last 5 appearances has gone 4.1 IP with no ER or Runs. NO hits, 3 BBs and 8 SO. He did hit 96 with his 2S FB in AZ on Tues.
    I don't see Jed waiving him when we have injuries all over and guys with options that can be sent down.
    I probably won't like the move Jed makes, but he can't play the "let's hope no one wants his 1.7mil remaining deal and we can hide him in Iowa" card.
    That's why I think the current Bullpen stays as is and Wicks goes to Iowa.
    I don't like that, but that's the fix I see.
    We'll find out soon enough!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Teheran minor league deal is done, per MLB.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Based on Phil’s sound analysis it sounds like a no brainer for Almonte to be placed on waivers as today’s roster move. We shall see.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    I suspect Counsell/Hottovy will use the piggy-back extensively, with Taillon and Hendricks pitching as the "pig" (and with a very short leash) and some combo of Wicks, Brown, and Wesneski (whichever two do not start) as the "backers."  

    Keep in mind that Keegan Thompson has a minor league option available, and if Yency Almonte is not outrighted by 4/26 he cannot be sent to the minors without his consent after that date. Almonte is out of minor league options, so I am talking about him getting outrighted to the minors if he is not claimed off waivers, and if he is claimed off waivers, the Cubs save the pro-rated portion of his $1.9M salary, which helps lower the Cubs 2024 AAV.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Totally agree. The 26 man roster very rarely consists of the 13 best position players and 13 best pitchers.

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Based on what Jed has done in the past, I’d say the plan is to

    -give Hendricks another few starts
    -give Taillon some runway ot get his season underway

    -Mix and match in the bullpen and see what sticks

    Jed usually doesn’t do a whole lot of waiver wire plays in-season, at least early in the season. He only reallly did that after he blew up the rosters in 21 and 22 because they needed bodies (guys like Schwindel, Fargas, etc).

    I think he’s a little handcuffed by a full 40 man in that he can’t really maneuver much with giving anyone showing ability at AAA (R Thompson/ Sanders/ Edwards etc). Brewer has the most tenuous grip there, and we will see what kind of chance he gets. Other than his spot, there isn’t a ton of 40 man wiggle room.

    I’m very curious to see what happens with Brown now that Taillon returns. Bullpen? Wicks to Iowa? 

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Pro teams have to play their "big money" guys if they are healthy and not "locker room" issues.
    The Cubs wanted to deal JHey off well before they bought him out. They just didn't want to pay him to play for someone else for that long. Jed did give him 20+mil to play for LAD last yr.
    Jed might also let Kyle walk at some point this year. Similar scenario to JHey, except Jed thought Kyle was going to be good/solid in '24!!
    You'd think Smyly is in the same book as well. Same with Neris (he's a 1yr vet RP, so he's not really in this convo too much).
    That's ~35mil between those three and those three are going to get opportunities until at least late June) over younger guys even if their performance is "iffy".
    But, Jed is going to play Taillon a lot. They have to try and justify that contract and hope a veteran works out.
    So, Taillon, Imanaga, and Hendricks are locks for the rest of April and probably May.
    Assad, Brown and Wicks handle the last spots until Steele is ready.
    Now, you're question has real merit when Steele comes back. That will interesting if Brown is still good and Hendricks is still bad. But Taillon is entirely safe as long as he's healthy.

    And the bullpen moves were "money" based as well. Smyly has actually been okay. But he hasn't been clearly better than Little. Little had one bad outing. But Smyly makes 9mil. If they needed another RHRP and one of Little and Smyly had to go, it was going to Little. But that doesn't mean Smyly is one of the best 13 arms for the team. 

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Childersb3: I think there was an issue with Luke Little coming into a game with men on base. He seems to need a "clean" inning to be dominant. So he is a future closer and needs to be used in that role at AAA. Same goes for Michael Arias. He needs to come into a "clean" inning, and is a future closer and needs to be used in that role at AA. Porter Hodge is a more versatile pitcher, a better version of Keegan Thompson (multi-inning RP). But Little, Arias, and Hodge (probably in that order) are the Cubs top three RP prospects (all three are Cubs Top 15 prospects).

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    So, let’s do a little war gaming. Taillon is back for tonight’s game. He pitched two rehab games, just a few innings each, and not especially sharp. Let’s face it, he hasn’t been lights out since the Cubs gave him the big contract. In other words, as flat out bad as Hendricks has been, the chances of Taillon being the savior don’t look exactly promising.

    If Taillon is equally ineffective or perhaps even worse, what’s the next move? Winning teams can often find a way to work around a dud fifth starter - kinda. Two dud starters make things much more difficult.

    I believe the biggest reason for the recent bullpen moves was dissatisfaction with the recent blowing of big leads and the recognition that the bullpen wasn’t all it was thought to be. In other words, they are exploring alternate options and configurations. If similar juggling becomes necessary (even more so than it already is), what kind of reasonable maneuvering do we think could be explored?

  • Childersb3 (view)

    Cubdom needs to prepare themselves for Wicks to be sent to Iowa for Taillon to come up.
    Ben Brown has 4 appearances. Wicks has 4 appearances.
    Ben has 16.1 IP.  Wicks has 17 IP
    Ben was a 1.1 WHIP.  Wicks has a 1.7 WHIP. Wicks does have significantly more SOs. 
    Ben has been better, though.
    I love Wicks. I think he's a fighter and his stuff has improved.
    But, Jed isn't ditching Hendricks just yet. He should. But he won't.
    Hendricks should go to the IL and Taillon-Imanaga-Assad-Wicks-Brown should be the rotation.
    Wont' happen though.