Cubs MLB Roster

Cubs Organizational Depth Chart
40-Man Roster Info

40 players are on the MLB RESERVE LIST (roster is full), plus two players are on the 60-DAY IL 

26 players on MLB RESERVE LIST are ACTIVE, twelve players are on OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENT to minors, one player is on the 15-DAY IL, and one player is on the 10-DAY IL

Last updated 4-18-2024
 
* bats or throws left
# bats both

PITCHERS: 13
Yency Almonte
Adbert Alzolay 
Javier Assad
Colten Brewer
Ben Brown
Kyle Hendricks
* Shota Imanaga
Mark Leiter Jr
Hector Neris 
* Drew Smyly
Jameson Taillon 
Keegan Thompson
* Jordan Wicks

CATCHERS: 2
Miguel Amaya
Yan Gomes

INFIELDERS: 7
* Michael Busch 
Garrett Cooper
Nico Hoerner
Nick Madrigal
Christopher Morel
Dansby Swanson
Patrick Wisdom

OUTFIELDERS: 4
* Cody Bellinger 
# Ian Happ
Seiya Suzuki
* Mike Tauchman 

OPTIONED: 12 
Kevin Alcantara, OF 
Michael Arias, P 
Pete Crow-Armstrong, OF 
Jose Cuas, P 
Brennen Davis, OF 
Porter Hodge, P 
* Luke Little, P 
* Miles Mastrobuoni, INF
* Matt Mervis, 1B 
Daniel Palencia, P 
Luis Vazquez, INF 
Hayden Wesneski, P 

10-DAY IL: 1 
Seiya Suzuki, OF

15-DAY IL
* Justin Steele, P   

60-DAY IL: 2 
Caleb Kilian, P 
Julian Merryweather, P
 





Minor League Rosters
Rule 5 Draft 
Minor League Free-Agents

Buy Low, Sell High

Anyone who has played fantasy baseball is familiar with the concept of trying to acquire players when they're slumping and trading players when they're on a hot streak. Let's take a look at the Cubs roster and see if we can spot any trends for the second half of the season. There are of course the traditional statistics such as ERA, wins and losses, WHIP, etc, but for the most part I'll be looking at some of the peripherals that are good indicators of what to truly expect from these guys. I'll begin with the starting rotation.

Carlos Zambrano - 8-3, 3.13 ERA, 5.76 K/9, 3.05 BB/9, 1.89 K:BB, 0.59 HR/9, .297 BABIP

There are three areas of concern with Big Z. The 5.68 ERA he put up in June, the alarming decline in his strikeout rate and of course, the shoulder strain that put him on the disabled list. Yeah, he'll be back by Friday, but anytime a pitcher goes down you have to worry about re-injuring himself. You can try and chalk up June to just having a bad month and maybe his shoulder was acting up on him before he actually told anyone, but what you really have to be worried about his is the 5.76 K/9 rate he's sporting this year.

It seems to have been a conscious decision on his part to go less for the strikeout and gain some more control on his pitches. His walk rate has dramatically improved to go along with the decrease in his strikeout rate (3.05 BB/9 this year compared to 4.20 and 4.84 the last two seasons). And you can't argue with the success he's had for the most part this year, but there's not a lot of pitchers that can put up ERA's in the low three's with that low a strikeout rate...I mean, we're talking almost Jason Marquis territory here. His groundball to flyball ratio has improved as well with his new approach and I think he can still dial it up whenever he needs to, but I' d sure feel a lot more comfortable if he got that K/9 rate above six at least.


Ryan Dempster - 9-3, 3.26 ERA, 7.37 K/9, 3.51 BB/9, 2.10 K:BB, 0.86 HR/9, .258 BABIP

Dempster was as lucky as they get early on in the season, sporting a BABIP in the low .200's which he had no chance in hell of sustaining. The lowest BABIP in the last five years for any pitcher with at least 150 innings was Chris Young in 2006 with a .237 BABIP and that was quite abnormal and he also pitches in a park where flyballs go to die. If you look at the leaderboards over the last few years, you'll see a few pitchers in the .250 range every season but most pitchers hover around the .300 mark.

The correction has already started and despite his last outing, Dempster is still well ahead of the bell curve and will possibly get a a well-deserved All-Star spot. Sure his career numbers suggest that he's still due for some more correction, but I think anyone who's watched him this year realizes that this is a different Dempster from past years...at least as a starter. His walk rates are still quite high, but he's fooling batters, keeping the ball in the park and seems to be able to induce a double play whenever he needs one.

That all being said, he's a prime candidate for one of those multi-year contracts Hendry likes to give out to players he finds off the scrap-heap that have career years with the Cubs (see Rusch, Glendon). And hopefully Hendry realizes that trying to catch lightning in a bottle makes for a hazardous work place.

Ted Lilly - 9-5, 4.56 ERA, 8.44 K/9, 3.21 BB/9, 2.63 K:BB, 1.52 HR/9, .292 BABIP

I covered Ted Lilly in yesterday's game thread, so I'll just recap. He finished June with a 3.21 ERA after a 6.46 in April and 4.72 in May. His biggest problem has been his home run rate which has skyrocketed to 1.52 HR/9 this year (it was 1.64 heading into yesterday's game). Also prior to yesterday's game, he was giving up a home run on 13% of the flyballs hit off him, which is an astoundingly high number. Most pitchers are in the 10-11% range and with yesterday's performance, it's already down to 12.6%.

So expect Lilly to continue to improve, the control isn't quite as good as last year, but he's still missing bats and expect a few less balls to fly over the fence.

Jason Marquis - 6-4, 4.96 ERA, 4.64 K/9, 3.59 BB/9, 1.53 K:BB, 1.21 HR/9, .289 BABIP

The same Jason Marquis that should be expected. He's not going to strike out a lot, he's going to put people on base, much to the chagrin of Cubs fans and Lou Piniella. He makes up for those walks by keeping the ball in the park and on the ground and at the end of the day, he's useful maybe 50% of the time (if that much). I took a look at his quality starts over the years (defined as at least six innings pitched and an ERA of 4.50 or below for that game).

Year GS
QS
QS%
2008 15 5 .33
2007 33 15 .45
2006 33 13 .39
2005 32 18 .56
2004 32 19 .59

 

 

 

 

 

 

A bit of slippage this year, but some of that can be attributed to Lou's quick trigger with Marquis and not being able to reach six innings. If you look at his game logs this year, I'd say nine of his 15 starts have been useful. He's gone at least five or more innings and given up three or less runs. There is value in what he does, mostly that he stays healthy and you can reasonably expect him to keep the team in the game on the days he starts. Can the Cubs do better? Sure there's more talented pitchers out there, but don't underestimate the value of staying healthy.

Of course, we'll all be doing a little happy dance the day he leaves the Cubs.

Sean Gallagher - 3-3, 4.36 ERA, 7.88 K/9, 3.35 BB/9, 2.35 K:BB, 1.01 HR/9, .315 BABIP

A rather pleasant surprise after a forgetful spring, the 22-year old has shown signs of brilliance. Sporting a four-seamer that hits the mid 90's, a two-seamer that dives away from lefties and solid control of his breaking stuff (a slider and a curve), I think better days are ahead for Gallagher. He still has quite a bit to learn about the art of pitching, but that probably could be said for most 22-year old pitchers. A look at his game logs show that six of his nine starts have been what you have to consider at least useful.

His numbers right now are promising and the looks of that BABIP suggest that they should get a little better. They also suggest that he'd pretty much have to be included in any deal that would get C.C. Sabathia to the Cubs.

Comments

[Gallagher's] numbers right now are promising and the looks of that BABIP suggest that they should get a little better. They also suggest that he'd pretty much have to be included in any deal that would get C.C. Sabathia to the Cubs. Him or Marmol. If I'm an Indian one of those guys HAS to be included.

[ ]

In reply to by garsky

well it isn't going to be Marmol, pretty sure he's untouchable. If you're going for it this year, then giving up a starter to get a starter is reasonable. I would guess a Gallagher and not-screwed-in-the-head Rich Hill plus one more marginal minor leaguer would get it done.

Costly considering the Cubs have 8 players set to make $100 MM next year and very doubtful they'd be able to sign Sabathia. Not to mention Eyre, Howry, Dempster and Wood are all set to be free agents. 

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

I think we've had all kinds of indications that payroll is available for the Cubs in 2008. I've said all along that I'd be shocked if the Cubs do manage to get a rental on Sabathia, there are just other teams with alot more to give. At this point I say probably the most likely move is AJ Burnett, and that comes at the price of not having to give up very much at all I wouldn't think. And I would fully advocate taking Marquis out of the rotation, but much like Barry Zito, he Cubs have money put into Marquis and it seems to be the main factor in his playing time. Hopefully he can channel one of his 'good' starts tonight.

[ ]

In reply to by Andrew

In other news from Gammons, apparently the Rays are looking at Murton.

Maybe we can get Jae-kuk Ryu back? :)

I'll take Jacob McGee, sure he'll be out for over a year, but that be a nice score for Murton right now.

as for the rest of the starters list...meh.

The problem is the A's are quite in the race, so there's absolutely no reason for them to move Harden. Burnett would be okay, his K/9 rate is over 9 which is fantastic, but also is sporting a BB/9 rate of 4.49, which will drive Lou (and me) bonkers. The .336 BABIP though suggest better days are ahead. Randy Wolf for Murton wouldn't be terrible either, but neither Burnett or Wolf are really that big of an improvement over what we have going.

Wolf's peripherals fwiw: 8.17 K/9, 3.42 BB/9, 1.01 HR/9, .317 BABIP 

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

He hasnt stayed healthy his entire career and almost every contending team (sans the Angels, Cards, D-backs, Rays, Red Sox) are going to be willing to pay through the noise for him. The only reason the A's are still in the playoff hunt is because they played over their head, while the Angels, Tigers, and Yankees have been playing under the ability of their talent to an extent. If somebody offered Beane a king's ransom for Harden he would pull the trigger.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

ryu is such a nice guy and loves the game. he's just not good. saw him a lot last year and a bit this year and wow...he was/is in GREAT shape. great athlete. he's just tapped out with his talent and better suited for pen work at this point. shame...sure isn't for a lack of working.

[ ]

In reply to by Ryno

haha. i forgot about that. regardless...he's a very classy dude who's a very nice guy. he's handling being in weird/humid durham, NC pretty well for a guy who was vaulted to the majors at an early age as a pimped out starter and is now trying to find a career of some sorts in the pen. he's really good with the kids and fans. the kids find him a real curiosity because even though we have asians around here we don't have many that look like athletes on the level he does. he's a 6'4" 230lb. beast of a kid. all muscle, all athlete...he just looks like a star. too bad he doesn't pitch like one.

[ ]

In reply to by 10man

It wasn't a huge deal to me that Ryu threw at the bird, though of course I think it was a dumb and destructive thing to do. But defending the guy because he was accurate enough to hit the bird in the first place probably isn't the best way to go about getting people to agree with your argument that he shouldn't be held at fault.

[ ]

In reply to by SheffieldCornelia

but he was AT FAULT for throwing at the bird. even he admitted as much. all i'm sayin is that we all make mistakes and we all deserve a break from them.

Brett Myers assigned to AAA (a move he had to accept since he has 5+ years of service time). Freddy Bynum called back up by the O's.

Tyler Colvin named Southern league player of the week, Donald Veal named to Southern League All-Stars.

I'm not conerned about Z's reduced SO numbers - I recall that when he first came up, his main "out" pitch was that awesome sinker that hitters beat into the ground. Then if he needed it, he could blow it by the hitters with no problem. Maybe this is a good development, since he had a tendency to put more guys on base last year, along with the increased SO's.

[ ]

In reply to by Dmac

problem is, when he first came up he was still K'ing hitters and had a higher GB/FB rate.

Year  GB/FB
GB%
K/9
2003  2.28  55.4% 7.07  2004  1.63  50.7% 8.07  2005
1.62  50.0% 8.14  2006
1.24  46.9% 8.83  2007  1.37
46.8%  7.36  2008  1.51  48.5% 5.76 

 

 

I didn't know that - thanks for the numbers. So how about this one - he's trying to be a complete pitcher, using his full arsenal, rather than just going for the K every time. If it saves more wear and tear on his arm (and he's still effective, big caveat), then I'm all for it.

[ ]

In reply to by Dmac

yeah, the saving more wear and tear on his arm gets kind of lost with the DL stint and all.

Z's got great movement on his pitches and I do think he's gotten better at "pitching' this year than just throwing. But he's going to have miss a few more bats for him to keep up that low 3 ERA. Above a six K/9 would be nice, above seven would be ideal.

[ ]

In reply to by Rob G.

speaking of...zito. yeah, he did cruddy for a few innings and etc etc etc, but one thing i noticed was how much more cerebral he was with his selection. it seems rather than trying to "push" his stuff (and getting no where with it) he's now using what he's got in a more intelligent fashion. how much of this is molina or the coaches...i dunno. he threw a TON of high fastballs on/near the same high plane where his curve ball would break and was not mixing up too much with where he threw the fastball. he wasnt working a ton around the plate with it...it was being mainly used as a deception pitch in tandum with the curve. he danced around with his curve location and mainly used his fastball for what was mentioned above...but he did use his changeup all over kinda like how people would normally use a fastball (or zito would traditionally use his curve) to set up for other stuff. it seems the "new" zito might be becoming a hell of a changeup/curve pitcher if it clicks. his fastball is practically an afterthought now. not like the changeup is new or the fastball is gone...he's just using them differently it seems (the inside fastball that was a big part of his game earlier seems to be disappearing lately, too).

STL wish a 2 run lead already after 1 inning...geez...lose already. -edit- sweet...mets tie top 4th.

Recent comments

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Phil, will the call up for a double header restart that 15 days on assignment for a pitcher? Like will wesneski’s 15 days start yesterday, or if he’s the 27th man, will that mean 15 days from tomorrow?

    I hope that makes sense. It sounds clearer in my head.

  • Charlie (view)

    Tauchman obviously brings value to the roster as a 4th outfielder who can and should play frequently. Him appearing frequently at DH indicated that the team lacks a valuable DH. 

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally onboard with your thoughts concerning today’s lineup. Not sure about your take on Tauchman though.

    The guy typically doesn’t pound the ball out out of the park, and his BA is quite unimpressive. But he brings something unique to the table that the undisciplined batters of the past didn’t. He always provides a quality at bat and he makes the opposing pitcher work because he has a great eye for the zone and protects the plate with two strikes exceptionally well. In addition to making him a base runner more often than it seems through his walks, that kind of at bat wears a pitcher down both mentally and physically so that the other guys who may hit the ball harder are more apt to take advantage of subsequent mistakes and do their damage.

    I can’t remember a time when the Cubs valued this kind of contribution but this year they have a couple of guys doing it, with Happ being the other. It doesn’t make for gaudy stats but it definitely contributes to winning ball games. I do believe that’s why Tauchman has garnered so much playing time.

  • Arizona Phil (view)

    Miles Mastrobuoni cannot be recalled until he has spent at least ten days on optional assignment, unless he is recalled to replace a position player who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And for a pitcher it's 15 days on optional assignment before he can be recalled, unless he is replacing a pitcher who is placed on an MLB inactive list (IL, Paternity, or Bereavement / Family Medical). 

     

    And a pitcher (or a position player, but almost always it's a pitcher) can be recalled as the 27th man for a doubleheader regardless of how many days he has been on optional assignment, but then he must be sent back down again the next day. 

     

    That's why the Cubs had to wait as long as they did to send Jose Cuas down and recall Keegan Thompson. Thompson needed to spend the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he could be recalled (and he spent EXACTLY the first 15 days of the MLB regular season on optional assignment before he was recalled). 

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    Indeed they do TJW!

    For the record I’m not in favor of solely building a team through paying big to free agents. But I’m also of the mind that when you develop really good players, get them signed to extensions that buy out a couple years of free agency, including with team options. And supplement the home grown players with free agent splashes or using excess prospects to trade for stars under team control for a few years. Sort of what Atlanta does, basically. Everyone talks about the dodgers but I feel that Atlanta is the peak organization at the current moment.

    That said, the constant roster churn is very Rays- ish. What they do is incredible, but it’s extremely hard to do which is why they’re the only ones frequently successful that employ that strategy. I definitely do not want to see a large market team like ours follow that model closely. But I don’t think free agent frenzies is always the answer. It’s really only the Dodgers that play in that realm. I could see an argument for the Mets too. The Yankees don’t really operate like that anymore since the elder Steinbrenner passed. Though I would say the reigning champions built a good deal of that team through free agent spending.

  • Childersb3 (view)

    The issue is the Cubs are 11-7 and have been on the road for 12 of those 18.  We should be at least 13-5, maybe 14-4. Jed isn't feeling any pressure to play anyone he doesn't see fit.
    But Canario on the bench, Morel not at 3B for Madrigal and Wisdom in RF wasn't what I thought would happen in this series.
    I was hoping for Morel at 3B, Canario in RF, Wisdom at DH and Madrigal as a pinch hitter or late replacement.
    Maybe Madrigal starts 1 game against the three LHSP for Miami.
    I'm thinking Canario goes back to Iowa on Sunday night for Mastrobuoni after the Miami LHers are gone.
    Canario needs ABs in Iowa and not bench time in MLB.
    With Seiya out for a while Wisdom is safe unless his SOs are just overwhelmingly bad.

    My real issue with the lineup isn't Madrigal. I'm not a fan, but I've given up on that one.
    It's Tauchman getting a large number of ABs as the de factor DH and everyday player.
    I didn't realize that was going to be the case.
    We need a better LH DH. PCA or ONKC need to force the issue in about a month.
    But, even if they do so, Jed doesn't have to change anything if the Cubs stay a few over .500!!!

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Totally depends on the team and the player involved. If your team’s philosophy is to pay huge dollars to bet on the future performance of past stars in order to win championships then, yes, all of the factors you mentioned are important.

    If on the other hand, if the team’s primary focus is to identify and develop future stars in an effort to win a championship, and you’re a young player looking to establish yourself as a star, that’s a fit too. Otherwise your buried within your own organization.

    Your comment about bringing up Canario for the purposes of sitting him illustrates perfectly the dangers of rewarding a non-performing, highly paid player over a hungry young prospect, like Canario, who is perpetually without a roster spot except as an insurance call up, but too good to trade. Totally disincentivizing the performance of the prospect and likely diminishing it.

    Sticking it to your prospects and providing lousy baseball to your fans, the consumers and source of revenue for your sport, solely so that the next free agent gamble finds your team to be a comfortable landing spot even if he sucks? I suppose  that makes sense to some teams but it’s definitely not the way I want to see my team run.

    Once again, DJL, our differences in philosophy emerge!

  • Dolorous Jon Lester (view)

    That’s just kinda how it works though, for every team. No team plays their best guys all the time. No team is comprising of their best 26 even removing injuries.

    When baseball became a business, like REALLY a business, it became important to keep some of the vets happy, which in turn keeps agents happy and keeps the team with a good reputation among players and agents. No one wants to play for a team that has a bad reputation in the same way no one wants to work for a company that has a bad rep.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate it too. But there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

    On that topic, I find it silly the Cubs brought up Canario to sit as much as he has. He’s going to get Velazquez’d, and it’s a shame.

  • TarzanJoeWallis (view)

    Of course, McKinstry runs circles around $25 million man Javier Baez on that Tigers team. Guess who gets more playing time?

    But I digress…

  • Sonicwind75 (view)

    Seems like Jed was trying to corner the market on mediocre infielders with last names starting with "M" in acquiring Madrigal, Mastroboney and Zach McKinstry.  

     

    At least he hasn't given any of them a Bote-esque extension.